Open Forum
New Delhi, 24 October 2008
Growing Communal
Violence
LET’S GO BACK TO
GANDHIAN ALTERNATIVE
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
The recent Hindu-Christian strife in Orissa, the spate of
violence over land transfer to the Amarnath Shrine Board, the pro-azadi stirs in the Kashmir valley are all indicative of the fact that religious
intolerance and social discontent is on the rise. Moreover, the terrorist
strikes in Jaipur, Bangalore, Ahmedabad and in
the nation’s capital, Delhi, have reinforced the
fact that the fundamentalist and disruptive forces are hell-bent to shatter India’s secular
image.
Today, there is a growing outcry all over the country that
unless something is done soon, our long-cherished secularism is clearly in
danger. And, none other than the country’s Prime Minister is seeing the warning
signals. He has rightly called for strengthening of laws and a stricter
enforcement of the same.
A point that is widely being made is that the growing
inequality, the widening gap between the rich and the poor residing in the same
area, the increasing unemployment and underemployment, specially among the
economically weaker sections, the dwindling farm income on which a major
section of the population lives and the lack of good educational facilities
among the disadvantaged sections have all led the youth wayward.
There can be no denying that all these factors have
contributed to the protests and violence in different forms – be it an
assertion of religious rights or the upholding of the impoverished cause by the
Maoists, resorting to violence and the killings.
While the development process continues to be geared towards
the interests of the upper class and providing them opportunities, to the
extent possible, the impoverished and the backward sections continue to
languish in poverty and squalor. Moreover, the urban bias in India’s planning
has accentuated the problem with an increase in migration from the rural to the
urban centres in search of employment and livelihood.
Whether in realm of shelter, health, education or job
opportunities, several surveys reveal that the majority are deprived of the
basic necessities of life. But even then, there are very few who get down to questioning
the percentage of government revenue being spent on their welfare.
In Orissa, extreme poverty as well as illiteracy of a large
section of the tribal population has become the hunting ground of various
religious groups. The dastardly incident of the murder of Graham Staines in
January 1999 has again been repeated in Kandamahal district, where six lakh
people live with over half being Hindu Kandh tribes. Sociologists are of the firm
opinion that religion in the State divides the 22 per cent tribal population,
most of whom have followed their own religion for several years.
Unfortunately, as is well known, the tribals have little
understanding of the religion they practice or convert into and are credulous
enough to believe everything their preachers tell them. Indeed, the conflict
between the Church and the indigenous, specially Hinduism, has been simmering
in Orissa (as also in many other States) for quite some time. While the Church
has been trying to garner strength through conversions, Hindutva has suddenly become aggressive, blending local culture
with militant nationalism.
While Hindu-Christian discord is a matter of fact in several
districts of Orissa, Muslim fundamentalism has also been an area of great, if
not greater, concern with the problem engulfing almost the entire nation. Whether
it is the Student’s Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) or the Indian Mujahideen,
their activities have revealed utter hatred for the country, obviously without
any sanction from the general Muslim mass. And, if the Sachar Committee report
is to be believed, this has happened because of perverted interpretation of
religious preaching coupled with lack of education.
The unity of Islamic fundamentalists is possibly behind the
coming together of the Hindus in Jammu.
But with the rise of sheer aggressiveness of the Muslims and the anti-national
feelings, fuelled by Pakistan
and to some extent by Bangladesh, the backlash from the Hindus is
steadily becoming a reality in certain parts of the country.
The attitude of the ruling Congress towards Muslim fundamentalists
has been one of appeasement, as it finds nothing wrong in nurturing a lax
security apparatus on the ground that special laws to counter terror may
eliminate minorities. But such leniency has not been followed with strong
political will to spread education among the minorities and bring them into the
mainstream.
There is a feeling, and not without justification, that if
communal violence has to be curbed, stricter measures are required, irrespective
of caste, creed and religion. More so as reports reveal that around 2000 people
have been killed in such incidents between 2001 and 2007.
Recall, that the father of the nation, Mahatma Gandhi, was a
great votary of secularism and preached strong bondage between Hindus and
Muslims. His philosophy and action, based on non-violence and satyagraha attracted unprecedented
Muslim (and other minority) support because he believed in universal religion –
“a belief in the ordered moral government of the universe …. That religion
transcends Hinduism, Islam Christianity etc. It does not supersede them. It
harmonizes them and gives them reality”.
Additionally, the Mahatma firmly believed that the study of
other religions “will give one a grasp of the rock-bottom unity of all
religions and afford a glimpse of the universal and absolute truth which lies
beyond the dust of creeds and faiths”.
Sadly, the philosophical contention of Gandhi’s views on
religious unity and commonality of approach is rarely discussed these days. The
legacy of Gandhi was earlier followed by our leaders, specially Jawaharlal
Nehru, Morarji Desai and others, and even Jinnah wanted his Muslim state to
allow free movement of Hindus and allow them practice of their religion in an
unfettered manner.
Regrettably, over the years the situation has changed drastically.
The prevalent fundamentalism can be attributed not just to the growing poverty
and lack of balanced development but also due to lack of philosophical
understanding and moral education of the young generation.
Add to this the mischievous teachings of religious leaders,
giving wrong or perverted interpretation of religious texts, accentuating the
animosity. It is, thus quite natural why Indian Muslims have been drawn in to
extremist rhetoric and that economic victimization has further complicated the
problem.
This contemporary indifference to true religion or to proper
religious understanding can be attributed to the materialist tendencies in
society and the trend towards greater accumulation of wealth. Morality has lost
its significance, as also the concept of shared humanity and fellow feeling.
It is significant to mention here that Gandhi viewed
religion and morality as identical because while religions might differ in their
theologies, they were strikingly alike in their moral teachings. He had boldly
urged the rejection of a religious doctrine “that does not appeal to reason and
is in conflict with morality”.
At such a crucial juncture, if the much-needed
transformation is to follow the materialist path-- abandoning moral and ethical
values, the future clearly doesn’t look bright. The basic question is: What
should be done? Firstly, there is need for an all-round change in our approach
to development, as it is breaking the very fabric of ordinary people’s lives all
over the world and marginalizing the majority.
For a real and effective transformation, based on the
premise of right to development for every human being, an alternative strategy
has to involve the people and only the people, their capacities and liabilities.
And, to move ahead with such development that goes against exclusion and
inequality and reaches out to all sections of society, specially the majority
rural populace, who are struggling for survival.
Secondly, there is need to spread moral education based on
Gandhi’s teachings and also that of all religions to every school student and
make it a compulsory subject so that values are inculcated in the young minds.
This must be enforced all over the country to counter the prevailing trend of
hatred, jealousy and animosity in society and spread the message of
fellow-feeling and brotherhood.
Finally, a nation-wide campaign has to be launched, aimed at
religious unity under a Foundation or Institute, whether government or
autonomous body, whose work would be to conduct discourses in government
offices at the district, State and Central level, the centres of higher
learning, including universities and IITs, private sector offices, chambers of
commerce and various other places. This would at least make people morally
aware, curb religious intolerance and control corruption, at least to some
extent. --INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|