Open Forum
New Delhi, 24 May 2007
Simple Story Made Complex
Uttar Pradesh Poll: A Post-mortem
By Dr. Syed Ali Mujtaba
Some writers have analysed the
Bahujan Samaj Party’s (BSP) victory in Uttar Pradesh in terms of the subaltern movement
in the State. There is no denying of the fact that a great deal of Dalit
resurgence is taking place at the grassroot
level in India's heartland, but there is little evidence to suggest that the
victory of this pro-low caste party owes to any revolutionary trend in the making.
The victory of the BSP was more
due to default rather than any calculated design. In the triangular contest,
the other two high profile parties; both the Samajwadi Party and the BJP had
lost the poll even before the electioneering had begun. The Congress on the fourth place had never been in the political
fray in any big way.
So there was nothing startling
about the UP electoral results. Every thing has been on expected lines as the
script was well-written before the elections. Those trying to read too much
into this result are basically the ones who are fond of blowing the trumpet
when the procession has hit the road.
As far as the BJP is concerned,
it had lost the election the moment it distributed the controversial CD. Its
poll managers thought that through the CD they would be able to polarize the
society to the 1990 level and win the election hands down. The Muslims did not
violently react and instead kept cool and so their strategy miserably failed. In
fact, the CD dissuaded many people who
might have initially thought of voting for the BJP.
Even the “caste arithmeticians” of
the BJP could not save their boat from sinking. The party remained a silent
spectator to the breaking of the Brahmin-Bania alliance in spite of having stalwart
upper-caste leaders like Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Murali Manohar Joshi, Rajnath
Singh, all from the State in its ranks. Their strategy of patching up with,
Kalyan Singh, the estranged OBC leader, too did not work. The former Chief
Minister could not steal a single vote from the SP or the BSP's kitty. On the
contrary, he presided over the loss
of both upper caste and lower caste votes to the BSP and the SP.
The BJP owes its ascendance in
Indian politics to Uttar Pradesh. It had a dream run from 1986 to 1992 when it
generated a mass hysteria among the
innocent voters promising them the Ram Raj by constructing a Ram temple at
Ayodhya where stood the Babari masjid. The gullible and religiously emotional
people got enticed by their high profile campaign; Saugandh Ram ki khate hain, Mandir Wahin Banayenge (I vow in the
name of Ram to construct the Mandir at the same spot where the Babari Masjid
stands). The "Chalaks""Ram Naam
ki loot machi hai, loot sako to looto" (there is a loot going on in
the name of Ram, loot it if you can.
(intelligent) who could sense the pulse of the time joined the BJP ranks
because for them it was;
In 1989 the BJP had 89 seats, thanks
to its temple campaign, its tally shot up to more than 200 seats in 1992.
However, after the destruction of the Babari Masjid in 1992, its fortunes
started tumbling down. The party since then has been witnessing a free fall. Currently it holds just 50 seats
in the 403-member Assembly. Indeed,
the results must be a day of rejoicing for the party’s rebel leader, Uma Bharti
who had openly called some of the BJP leaders as "Satta ke dalal" – (‘Pimps for Power’).
The outgoing Samajwadi Party had
lost the confidence of the people and its rule had become synonymous with
rampant corruption, nepotism and lawlessness (goonda raj).
The Party failed to address any of the
pressing developmental issues and got embroiled into many things that dented
its poor, pro-dalit, and pro-minority image.
The SP leader, Amar Singh, who
actually held the strings of power, had become an eyesore for his flamboyant
lifestyle. His close proximity with actress
Jayaparadha, actor Amithabh Bachchan, industrialist Anil Ambani and the owner
of Sahara group of industries, left the people
wondering whether the Samajwdi Party was championing the cause of the poor or
it was a party of the rich. The Nithari killings were the last nail in the SP’s
coffin. It had lost the election even before the dates for the polling were
announced.
As far as the Congress is concerned, the party was nowhere in the political
race. It still has not been able to recover its lost base it enjoyed during the
pre-1980s phase. Traditionally, the Congress
was favoured by the upper castes and the Muslims. And in combination of certain
other backward categories, it was able to cobble a majority during successive elections since independence. The Congress support base got totally demolished when religion
versus pro-poor politics (Kamandal vs
Mandal) came into play in Uttar Pradesh. The upper caste vote went to the
BJP, the Muslims opted for the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party and the
other backward categories and Schedule Castes too flocked to the SP or BSP
ranks. So the Congress was left with
nothing to fall back on.
Given such background, no matter
how much Gandhi Parivar may have
toiled their sweat and blood electioneering in the heat and dust of the
Indo-Gangetic plains, they could hardly make any difference on the electorates.
People may have flocked to the road shows of the Gandhi family, but when it
came to voting, they had their own preferences. These days voters just do not
vote for the name sake, they analyze the elections in terms of their own cost-benefit.
The Congress’
tally of 22 seats and its paltry vote percentage speaks volumes about the poor organizational
strength of India's
oldest political party. If this trend continues, the Congress may be reduced to a mere symbol on the electronic
voting machines.
The BSP’s victory makes the
picture crystal clear. The people of Uttar Pradesh had to choose between SP,
BJP and the BSP. The SP had been thoroughly discredited during its rule and
people wanted a change of Government. Now their choice was reduced to the BJP
and the BSP. The BJP had shot itself in the foot by releasing the controversial
CD. So the people had no other choice but to vote for the BSP. It is a simple
story, made complex.
The only great thing about BSP’s victory
was that it gave up its strident political campaign against the upper castes.
Its direct attack on them saying; BJP ke
Teen Dalal; Tilak, Tarazu aur Talwar (the BJP has three pimps; Brahmins
(Tilak) Bania (tarazu) and Rajput (sword) was a very powerful piece of sloganeering
that sums up the entire Indian history in terms of oppression
by these three symbols of power all through its civilization.
The BSP having realized that such
sloganeering could not catapult it to power in the previous elections, decided
to drop this time and made friends with the upper castes. By giving tickets to
the upper caste candidates, the party was able to get a comfortable majority.
The people of Uttar Pradesh must
be complimented for giving a decisive mandate to a political party. Their
collective effort saved the State from the ordeals of post-poll alliances and
horse-trading that has become a hallmark of the Indian polity these days. This also
shows the signs of maturating of the Indian democracy.
The people have had four core
demands; road, water, electricity and job (sarak,
paani, bijli aur naukri). They tried all the three political formations
before; they have lived under the Ram Raj of the BJP, the Mulyam Raj and the
Mayawait Raj, but none had been able to addressssing it right!
their basic demands. They have again brought the BSP to power. Will the new Government
change the ground realities? Well, this is a tough call and no marks for gue
However, one great lesson to learn from the Uttar Pradesh elections is that
the voters these days just do not vote for the name sake, they judge the
party’s performance in power and select or reject them in the next poll. The
next election is a long way from now, till then the people of Uttar Pradesh
have no other go than to face the Maya Raj!---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|