Open Forum
New Delhi, 10 July 2008
Telangana State
NO JUSTIFICATION
FOR SEPARATION
By T.D. Jagadesan
The Congress must tread carefully in dealing with the Telengana
Rashtra Samithi (TRS) for support to pull its government through at the Centre.
The TRS chief K Chandrashekhar’s condition that the Centre start the process of
carving out a separate State of Telangana in lieu of his three MPs vote would
create more problems than resolve. Recall that voters of the Lok Sabha and
Assembly Constituencies in the Telangana districts of Andhra Pradesh have in
the March byelections decisively rejected the TRS and the separatism that it
stands for. It was utmost a referendum and the people voted overwhelmingly to
reject the separatist candidate.
Andhra Pradesh is a State which has made impressive progress
since the 1956 reorganisation of States, which created a bigger State of Andhra
Pradesh by merging the original Andhra (the Telugu speaking districts of the
undivided Madras Presidency) and the eight Telugu speaking districts of the
former Nizam’s dominions of Hyderabad.
The reorganization of States had abolished the Nizam’s Hyderabad by merging its Maharathi-speaking districts with
Maharashtra, Kannada-speaking districts with
Karnataka and Telugu speaking districts with Andhra Pradesh.
While both the Marathi speaking districts and Karnataka
speaking districts accepted the new order gracefully, some sections in the
eight Telugu speaking districts, earlier called-Telangana area, have been
intermittently demanding a separate State of Telangana by dividing Andhra Pradesh. This
demand somehow received support from some national parties in the last General
elections, and this resulted in the strengthening of the agitation for a separate
Telangana.
The TRS joined the UPA Government at the Centre and formed
part of the government in the hope of getting its demand met. The failure of
the UPA Government to concede a separate State led to their protest resignation
last year, and thus necessitated the byelections, where they appealed to the voters
for supporting their demand for a separate Telangana.
The result was a decisive “no” from the people. Clearly, the
majority of the people of these eight Telangana districts see much merit in remaining
part of Andhra Pradesh and do not fancy the idea of a separate Telangana State. On no economic ground can
Telangana be justified. The city of Hyderabad
has benefited enormously from being the capital of an enlarged Andhra Pradesh.
The wealthier section from coastal Andhra Pradesh has
invested substantially in Hyderabad
city, resulting in a prosperity which everyone can see. It is only a tiny
minority which does not appreciate that the stopping of the steady flow of
resources from coastal Andhra Pradesh to Hyderabad and the other districts in
the Telangana area, which do not have much physical resources, will make
Hyderabad suffer immensely.
In the last few years it has become one of the new
metropolitan cities of the country. It has one of the best international
airports in India,
and is also a major hub of railway traffic in the south. Interestingly, it is
the only city outside the four metros where the United
States is opening a consulate, thereby indicating how
important it is in US
perception. Earlier Iran
had also opened a consulate there.
Hyderabad has become the focal point of
high-tech industries and a number of other industries like drugs and
pharmaceuticals. All this might come to a halt if a separate Telangana State
is created. It will benefit only a small class of Telangana politicians who are
hoping to gain ministerial posts in the new State. But, for the ordinary man, whether
in coastal Andhra or in the Telangana areas, the creation of a separate
Telangana can only be a retrograde development.
The time has, therefore, come when the Centre should
formally turn down the demand for a separate Telangana State.
The people of Telangana have given enough grounds by their recent voting
behaviour. This amply indicates that while some of them might still outwardly
make noises for Telangana for some time to come in their heart of hearts they
know that it is neither possible nor desirable.
Except for Haryana, the creation of smaller States like
Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand has not been an unmixed blessing. With
a much smaller number of MLAs to manage, these States have become easy grounds
for horse-trading and manipulation, resulting in prolonged political uncertainty.
Often political changes can be brought about by managing a handful of MLAs with
money power and muscle power.
This also affects economic growth. If a separate Telangana
comes up, there is every likelihood of such a scenario being repeated. All
right-thinking people in Andhra Pradesh and elsewhere should, therefore, resist
this.
Just because a small, but vocal minority about for smaller States
like Telangana, Gorkhaland or Vidrabha there is no reason to support such
demands, ignoring the long-term political and economic interests of the nation.
They should be treated with the contempt they deserve. --- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|