ECONOMIC HIGHLIGHTS
11 August 2005, New Delhi.
Tapping Black Money
NO MORE AMNESTY
SCHEMES, PLEASE
By Dr Vinod Mehta
With the revenue earnings falling
below the expectation level and the expenditure on mitigating natural disasters
by the administration increasing, the Government is again mulling over the
question of tapping black money to generate resources. One of the options being
considered is to allow interest-free deposit scheme with the lock-in period of
three years or more. The other option is to ask the depositors to furnish
information even if their earning is less than Rs.5,000 per annum as interest.
Surprisingly, over the past 50 years
no Government at the Centre has been able to tackle the menace of black money.
A number of amnesty schemes have been announced to unearth this money but it
continues to grow. This only shows that no Government had the political courage
to tackle this problem, and that over the years’ black money as a percentage of
the GDP has continued to grow.
There is no reliable estimate of the
quantum of black money in the country. Several scholars and committees have
tried to make an estimate. The first such scholar was Prof. Nicholas Kaldor,
who estimated the quantum at 6% of the GDP during 1952-53. Thereafter, the Direct
Taxes Enquiry Committee, known as Wanchoo Committee, put the figure at 4.2% of
the GDP between 1962 to 1968-69, while its member, Dr. D.K. Rangnekar,
estimated more than 8%. For 1980-81, the National Institute of Public Finance
and Policy (NIPFP) estimated 18 to 21% of the GDP, while Prof. S.B. Gupta gave
the figure of 45.8%. For 1987-88, he put the figure of 51.7% of the GDP.
Differences in estimates
notwithstanding, the important points highlighted by these studies are that:
the quantum of black money has not only been growing in absolute but also in
relative terms as a percentage of the GDP; black income has grown from 6% to
51% of the GDP in the past 50 years; the rate of growth of black income
generation is faster than the rate of growth of the GDP, and finally there has
been no political will to tackle this problem. It’s not that there is no tax
evasion in other countries, but it’s not to the extent of 51 per cent as is
here. For instance, the tax evasion in the US is about 2% of the GDP.
In 1998, the Voluntary Disclosure of
Income Scheme, (VDIS) was introduced to mop up black money. Under it, the
Government was able to garner over Rs 10,000 crore as tax revenues on disclosed
income. This was hailed “a great success”, as earlier amnesty schemes could all
together collect only Rs.500 crore. But, this made no dent in the black money.
It is, therefore, surprising that the Government is considering coming out with
some sort of another amnesty scheme. What is the guarantee that it will mop up
the black money in circulation? An amnesty scheme will be viewed by honest tax
payers as an award to evaders for concealing their income. But it needs to be
tackled once for all.
The nation will seriously need to
think of how to handle the problem.
Apparently, it will need to be tackled at two different levels. One, it
will have to see how to drastically reduce the black money in circulation and,
two, how to stop its generation. Therefore, taking into account the quantum of
black money in circulation, the country will have to adopt a mix of fiscal and
administrative measures. Amnesty schemes are unethical and, in fact, penalise
the honest tax payers.
The easiest way to tackle the
problem of black money is to demonetize the currency. But, this is unlikely to achieve the desired
result, as a large sum of this has been invested in real estate, gold etc.
Also, the cost of printing new currency for immediate circulation may be quite
prohibitive. But, this option may need to be used to knock out a large
proportion of black money around. A few countries have done it in the past,
with Russia
being the latest.
However, it would be more useful to
use administrative methods to tackle black money, even if these may appear to
be harsh. The Income Tax Department may be strengthened with trained staff to
specially detect black money and book the culprits. Perhaps, a special kind of
intelligence bureau to detect economic crimes, like tax evasion, may be set up.
Thus, the revenue administration would be able to first gather facts about tax
evasion from this agency and corner the tax evader, rather than carry out raids
on hunches.
Similarly, harsh measures such as
attaching of property of the tax evader, denying of Government contracts to
evaders, compulsory jail and so on, could be adopted by the administration. One
may ask: why such harsh measures? The answer: soft measures have not worked in
the past and even the disclosures in the 1998 VDIS, according to some analysts,
were only tip of the iceberg.
As for stopping the generation of
black money itself, the Government will have to work on various measures
simultaneously. As a first step, the entire tax structure will have to be
revamped. The proportion of indirect
taxes in the total revenues will have to be reduced, while the proportion of
income taxes will have to be increased.
To begin with, there is a case for reducing excise duty and other taxes
on items of daily use such as edible oil, soaps, toothpastes, biscuits, etc.
and on processed food items like frozen vegetables, fruits, meat, canned
juices, jams, soups etc. These items are
not consumed by the rich alone but also by those on limited incomes.
As for income tax, there is not only
a case for further reduction in tax rates and widening of tax net but also
simplification of the tax system. While reducing the tax rates, the tax net
should be spread wider to cover incomes of agriculturalists, small traders,
shopkeepers etc.
It has also been observed that there
are many companies which have not paid a single paisa of tax for the past
several years, because of loopholes in the tax rules, especially the ones
relating to depreciation. This needs to be looked into seriously. The loophole
should be plugged and these companies forced to pay taxes.
An administrative measure, which can
go a long way in curbing the generation of black money, is to assign every
individual and a corporate entity an identification number (different from PAN
number), like the one assigned to houses or vehicles and make it mandatory that
all payments, above a certain amount, be made through banks.
The identification number will have
multiple uses once it is all computerized. It can be used for admissions in
schools and colleges, for electoral rolls, for opening bank accounts, for
getting passports and so on.
If the use of this number is made
compulsory for every single financial transaction--be it sale and purchase of
goods and services, loans, gifts, payment of medical bills, purchase of air or
rail tickets, payment of wages, salaries and perks etc.--as well as on other
occasions, it will make tax evasion very difficult, for both an individual or a
corporate entity.
Since the registration of births and
deaths has been made compulsory, it should not be difficult to administer the
identification system, especially in this age of computers. Identities could be
established within minutes of individuals or corporate entities conducting
business anywhere in the country. And, it would be easier for the revenue
administration to get requisite information on their financial transactions by
asking institutions such as banks for details. This system is not new. In the US, the social
security number has similar multipurpose uses.
The
rooting out of black money and stopping its generation should be high on the Government’s
agenda. There is no need to show mercy to tax evaders; no more amnesty schemes.
Enough, is enough.--INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|