Defence Notes
New
Delhi, 20 June 2008
US Eyes Defence Market
ANTONY FOR HOME PRODUCTION
By Radhakrishna Rao
Defence Minister A.K.Antony, while
inaugurating the new building complex of the Bangalore-based Defence Avionics
Research Establishment (DARE), stressed the need for self reliance in the
design, development and manufacture of high precision avionics systems for the
Indian Air Force, which is working out a strategy for modernization and
augmentation on a massive scale.
Antony has repeatedly expressed his
vehement opposition to the blind and wholesale import of defence hardware and
advanced technological systems. In fact, he has made it clear that India will
clinch a deal for defence hardware and associated technology only as an equal
partner. His thesis is that India
has technological expertise and an industrial base, resurgent enough to not
only absorb and adopt advanced imported technologies, but also to indigenously
design and develop state-of-the-art weapons and armaments.
‘High technology products need to be
futuristic. Our over-dependence on foreign suppliers must reduce. We must
develop our own systems indigenously. A tendency to depend on foreign suppliers
may land the country and the armed forces in deep trouble in crucial times in
the form of import restrictions, technology transfer denials or even undue and
unjustifiable delay in the delivery of already contracted systems or components
of critical nature” observed Antony.
He did not leave anyone in doubt that he was referring to the US.
In fact, the American sanctions and
technology embargo that came in the wake of India’s
1998 nuclear blasts had affected the developmental schedules of a number of
projects of national importance including the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA),
developed by the Aeronautical Development Laboratory (ADA) and the Saras
multi-role light transport aircraft, developed by the National Aerospace
Laboratories (NAL), Bangalore.
Notwithstanding the growing bonhomie
in Indo-US relations, many Indian industrial outfits, research institutions and
scientific organizations continue to be under the US Entity List. Not
surprisingly then, both in the civilian and defence sectors here, the US is not
favored as a dependable and reliable partner for projects of critical nature.
As it is, way back in early 90s the US had coerced an economically emaciated and
political unstable Russia
into going back on its commitment of transferring the critical cryogenic engine
technology to India.
Their argument was that the transfer of technology, which is of dual use,
constituted a clear-cut violation of the so-called Missile Technology Control
Regime (MTCR). Overcoming all the impediments, the Indian Space Research
Organisation (ISRO) has now successfully developed an indigenous cryogenic
engine constitution the upper stage of the three-stage GSLV (Geosynchronous
Satellite Launch Vehicle).
Similarly, DRDO has not forgotten
how the US tried to coerce the Union Government into dropping the development programme
of Agni range of surface-to-surface, nuclear capable missiles. Antony notes that “despite technology denials
and restrictive export regimes, DRDO has been able to develop strategic systems
and advanced missiles”.
Against such a backdrop, India’s defence establishment is fully aware of
the implications of getting defence hardware and advanced armament systems from
the US.
For the denial of spares and refusal to service the hardware in the event of an
embargo would mean a serious setback to the country’s defence preparedness. But
then, Russia which has
supplied India
with a vast array of military equipment including combat aircraft and utility
helicopters is fast eroding its Indian base. Indeed, the Indian military
planners are losing patience with Russia for its failure to stick to
the deadline and make available spares on time.
Peeved by the inordinate delay and a
hefty price hike in respect of retrofitting the decommissioned aircraft carrier
Admiral Gorshkov, naval chief Admiral Suresh Mehta had sometime back questioned
the logic of looking at Russia
as a reliable and trusted military partner. Similarly, the Russian insistence
on a massive increase in the price tag of Su-30 MKI multi-role combat aircraft,
which currently constitutes the very backbone of the IAF, has not gone down
well with the Indian defence establishment. It is here that the US is trying to
step into the Indian defence scenario with robust optimism.
In this context, the statement made
by the US
defense secretary Robert Gates that military-to-military ties between the two
countries would continue to be independent of the controversial Indo-US
civilian nuclear agreement, assumes significance. Of course, Indian
Government’s lack of political will to go ahead with the deal has pushed it
into a “slow and certain death.” Gates was forthright in his assertion, “We ask
for no special treatment. We are pleased to have a place on the table. And we
believe that in a fair competition, we have a good case to make”.
On its part, US defence and
aerospace major Boeing estimates a US$10-15 billion defence market in India over the
next one decade. “According to industry projections, there will be a need for
around 1000 defence aircraft by 2020, while 70 per cent of the requirement will
be filled by the existing orders for aircraft like Su-30s” says Deba Mohanty, a
defence analyst with the New Delhi-based think tank Observer Research
Foundation.
Perhaps the biggest trump card of
the American defence hardware and systems is their perceived superiority in
terms of performance, efficiency, technology and state-of-the-art electronics
and avionics systems in comparison to the Russian defence equipment. The latter’s
biggest disadvantage lies in avionics and electronics, which form a major
component of an aircraft.
Both Boeing and Lockheed Martin,
keen on grabbing the mega Indian order for the supply of 126 medium multi-role
combat aircraft to IAF have offered their most advanced fighter machines to India. The
argument of Boeing is that F/A-18E/F Super Hornet that it has offered to India is
already in service with the Australian Air Force. Not to be outdone, Lockheed
Martin has sweetened its offer of making available F-16 IN Fighter Falcon by
hinting at a possible future sale of F-35 JSF of perhaps F-22 combat aircraft
if India
goes in for F-16.
Boeing which has submitted a
proposal for the supply of eight long-range maritime reconnaissance and anti-submarine
warfare aircraft at an estimated cost of US$2-billion is awaiting the nod from defence
ministry. The Boeing P-8A multi mission maritime aircraft built around a
Boeing-737 aircraft is, however, known to be under its active consideration. In
response to Indian request for proposal for 22 attack helicopters, Boeing is
offering its AH-64 Apache Longbow.
Meanwhile, US aerospace and defence
contractors are awaiting Indian request for proposal for the supply of around
200 light utility helicopters. These helicopters will replace the aging fleet
of Cheeta and Chetaks in service with the IAF and the Indian army. Originally, India had
planned the acquisition of 300-plus light utility helicopters. But with the Bangalore based
aeronautical major HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd) coming forward to develop a
hundred plus light utility helicopters, the Indian defence ministry decided to go
in for the import of around 200 such rotary wing machines. Is there need to
shop elsewhere? ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|