Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 5 June 2008
Prioritise Rail
& Waterways
WANTED AN AGRICULTURE
POLICY
By Dr. Vinod Mehta
(Former Director,
Research, ICSSR)
In 2000 a draft agricultural policy was announced, but
nothing has been heard thereafter. We
had a number of industrial policies since 1956 but no agricultural policy worth
a name. Scandalously, in a country where 70% of the population is dependent on
agriculture, there is no national agricultural policy. Worse, successive
Governments have neglected this sector for a long time. It is, therefore, not
surprising that the weakest link in our economic reforms is the lack of any
meaningful agricultural policy.
The so-called “agricultural policy” that is now being
pursued is biased towards ensuring sufficiency in food production and the public
distribution system. Recall, it was born when India had to import food under the
American PL 480 scheme to feed its population, which was politically
humiliating. The foodgrain policy that emerged put many restrictions on the
movement of foodgrain from one region to another region within the country, the
prices came to be fixed by the State and severe restrictions were imposed on
the export-import of agricultural products.
With the introduction of high yielding varieties of wheat
and other crops the country has been able to achieve a reasonable degree of
self-sufficiency in foodgrain production.
For many years India
has not made any distress purchase of foodgrains from any country to feed its
population. This is an important national
achievement.
However, with the signing of the WTO we have to see beyond
feeding the population. Keeping intact
the ideal of self-sufficiency in grain production, agriculture must look for
lucrative markets within and outside the country. It needn’t be dependent upon the
State for remunerative prices but look towards free market for right prices. Plainly,
the agricultural sector needs to be accorded the status of industry so that it
can also reap the benefits of economic reforms.
As a first step, after meeting the requirements of the
public distribution system, foodgrain should be allowed to move freely within
the country and all restrictions on its movement should be lifted. This will
not only work as a stabilizing factor for foodgrain prices within the country
but also ensure foodgrain availability in food-deficit areas. True, food will be relatively expensive these
areas but it will stave off situations as happened on several occasions in
Kalahandi, Orissa
This will also save the State from artificially propping up
the prices to ensure remunerative prices to the farmers. Since the farmers have been functioning in a
regime where the movement of grain within the country has been regulated by the
Government it should be deregulated in a phased manner so as to cause minimum
upheaval in the grain market.
But, the removal of restrictions on the movement of grain within
the country also calls for development of the transport infrastructure to
handle the movement of grains and other agricultural products. Presently, the
Railways are handling the bulk transport of grain as movement of grain to
remote areas via road transport is a very expensive proposition. Road transportation
is viable only for movement of grain to nearby areas. However, this mode of
transport cannot be accorded high priority given the size of the country.
Leaving only two modes of transport: railways and waterways.
The railways are already moving bulk of the grain but the waterways are not yet
fully developed to handle grain movement after all restrictions have been
removed. Thus, as a first step the railways should be geared to handle massive
grain movement. Second, we must have a waterways or river transport policy so
that grain could be moved in bulk by boats wherever possible.
Also, if India
has to market its agricultural products internationally we need to immediately develop
ports to handle bulk import-export. Presently, our ports are poorly equipped to
handle any bulk transportation. The first priority before lifting the ban on
free movement is to ensure that its ports are in a position to handle bulk
movement. Once we have agreed to allow
our agriculture to play in the international market then we shall not only be
exporting high value agricultural products to foreign countries to earn foreign
exchange but also importing relatively cheaper stuff to meet the domestic
requirements.
It is common knowledge that our ports both on the eastern
and western side are a bottleneck. Leave aside agriculture, they are not
equipped even to handle the bulk movement of industrial goods. More than a
decade ago, India had to
import two lakh tonnes of wheat from Australia to beef up its grain
stocks but none of the ports were equipped to handle this size of import.
Therefore, development of ports must be accorded high priority along with the
development of railways and river transport.
The international agricultural market is very different from
the domestic market. Most of the trade
in agricultural commodities is conducted by very powerful multi-national
corporations which have the financial clout to influence the day-to-day price
movements of agricultural commodities that enter the international market. Sadly,
we do not have any equivalent trading houses either in the private or the
public sector. There is a need to create such large trading houses for trade in
agricultural commodities.
It is also essential for the agricultural sector to know its
strength and weaknesses and concentrate only on its strength in the
international market. Perhaps it needs to
supplement its efforts with better packing to make its goods acceptable and
attractive in the international market.
However, in the domestic sector too a lot more need to be done to adequately
meet the demand for various agricultural commodities and at the same time produce
enough surpluses for export purposes.
This leads us to the problem of developing high-yielding
varieties of various agricultural commodities so that adequate surpluses are
produced to meet the international demand.
Unfortunately, agricultural universities which were supposed to help
develop new strains of grain and other agricultural products to help increase
the per hectare output have not lived up to their expectations. Except for some success with the Green
Revolution in the 60’s no remarkable breakthrough has been achieved in
developing high yielding varieties of agricultural products. Since climatic
factors differ from region to region it is necessary to develop strains of high
yielding varieties of agricultural commodities for each of the regions of the
country.
In other words, we need to have a large number of different
varieties of high yielding seeds for each of the region of the country. This is a difficult task but we have to make
a beginning and improve the quality of seeds and other agricultural inputs. Better
use of all available opportunities in the current staid agricultural market should
be made to help the nation play a pivotal role in the domestic and
international agricultural market.
It is high time that the country comes out with an
appropriate agricultural policy, which is fine-tuned to the emerging
international economic order before the budgetary exercise for the next
financial year is completed. --- INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|