ROUND THE STATES
New Delhi, 12 May 2006
UPA Strengthened
LEFT SWEEPS W.
BENGAL & KERALA
By Insaf
At the end of the prolonged election process for five State Assemblies,
three things stand out loud and clear: The Left Front has strengthened its
position in the national politics, communal forces are beginning to be
eliminated and the Congress has
failed to change the ruling UPA’s chemistry of dependency. As Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh himself claimed: “It is a victory for the secular forces and a
victory for the UPA.” The CPM-led Left Front has swamped West
Bengal and notched an emphatic victory in Kerala. Notwithstanding Congress President Sonia Gandhi’s record victory in Rae
Bareli, the outcome in Assam,
West Bengal, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry
has little to cheer the Congress
which went to battle with high expectations.
The Congress
support base has decreased in all the five States, even though the party has
emerged almost unhurt. It has retained power in Assam and Pondicherry and has become the main prop for
the DMK and its Chief Minister in Tamil Nadu. In Assam,
which threw up a hung Assembly, with
the Congress winning 52 seats in the
126-member Assembly, against 71 in
2001, the party will have the satisfaction of retaining power, a remarkable feat
achieved by Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi for the first time in 30 years. Contrary
to predictions that the Congress
would lose power, it has returned as the single-largest party. Tarun Gogoi’s
strategy paid rich dividends. He worked hard to improve the State’s financial
position in the last two years, implemented several development projects and also
ensured communal harmony.
* * * * *
Impressive Victories
The CPM-led left Front has conclusively defeated its
political rivals in West Bengal and Kerala and has for the first time won four
seats in Assam. The Front
recorded an impressive tally of 220
in the 294-member Assembly. This is
a remarkable improvement from the 2001 score of 199 seats, thanks to Chief Minister
Buddhadev Bhattacharjee’s reformist image and practical economic policies
during the last five years, which earned him greater support in urban areas
than during the last 28 years of Left rule in the State. The CPM under Jyoti
Basu had already built up its vote banks in rural areas by its land reforms. Buddhadev
greatly improved on it by giving the CPM a dynamic thrust as the country’s new,
reformist Left. In Kerala, the Front wrested power by winning 99 seats in the
140-member Assembly. Anti-incumbency
factor and in-fighting in the State Congress
led to the downfall of the Congress-led
United Democratic Front (UDF).
* * * *
Sonia’s Thumping
Win
Sonia Gandhi’s thumping victory in the byelection for the
Rae Bareli Lok Sabha seat was a foregone conclusion. But the low voter turn-out
of merely 43 per cent of the electorate was a big surprise. The Congress
leadership has attributed this to various factors. First, even in 2004 Lok Sabha poll, the
voting percentage was only 48.42. But
she had defeated the Samajwadi candidate by a huge margin of over 2,50,000
votes. This time the margin of victory is more than 4 lakh, a record. Second, the voters were confident about her
sure win and therefore, preferred to stay at home to beat the scorching sun. In
some of the polling booths in rural areas, there were more poll officials than
voters. Another little known reason for the
low polling was that about 40 per cent of the voters in the constituency are
migratory labourers and were away to adjoining States for harvesting crops.
* * * *
Expensive Elections
The Assembly polls
for 824 seats in four States and a Union
Territory turned out to
be a very expensive affair, literally. They are estimated to have cost the
nation a whopping Rs.2,000 crore.
Political insiders have also estimated that an average of Rs. 2 crore
was spent in each constituency.
Calculated on this basis, the amount which the mainstream political
parties spent on these elections crossed
Rs.2,000 crore. The poll expenses in
West Bengal and Pondicherry were comparatively
less than what was spent in Tamil
Nadu, Assam and
Kerala. Significantly, 90 per cent of
the estimated expenditure has been spent by the candidates of two or three
major political parties. According to
the Election Commission norms,
maximum poll expenses per candidate for the bigger States is Rs.10 lakh and for
UTs like Pondicherry Rs.5 lakh.
* * * *
Mulayam Another
“Vikas Purush”
UP’s Chief Minister and Samajwadi Party supremo Mulayam
Singh Yadav has fired his first salvo for the State Assembly
poll about eight months away. He has
embarked on a publicity blitzkrieg: full-page advertisements in leading
newspapers, projecting him as a “Vikas Purush” and his Government as the
champion of development. This is very
much like what the Vajpayee Government did for itself prior to the Lok Sabha
poll in 2004. Mulayam Singh has pledged
in these advertisements to make Uttar Pradesh an “Uttam Pradesh”, a “model
State” to win friends and influence public opinion. Attention is particularly
focused on his Government’s approval for 7,000 MW of power projects in the next
six years, electrification of about 6,000 villages and improvements in such areas
as agriculture, infrastructure, drinking water, health and education.
* * * *
Crackdown On Naxals
Now that the State elections are over, the Union Government
has finalized re-deployment of Central para-military forces tied up with the
polling exercise. All the 772 Companies of the Central para-military forces
spared for the poll duty are being moved to Chhattisgarh, to enable intensified
counter-offensive against the Naxalites who have made the new State their
latest target. The plan is to undertake
a joint offensive by the Central forces and the State police, using helicopters
to para-drop the personnel into the heavily forested Naxal hideouts. The Union Home Ministry has also decided to
set up a dedicated anti-Naxal cell to coordinate intelligence, development
outreaches and implementation of policies to check the rising Naxal menace,
which has now enveloped 15 States.
* * * *
Telangana Remains
Elusive
Statehood for Telangana remains elusive as ever. Clearly, the Congress,
which leads the UPA Government at the Centre and rules Andhra Pradesh, is in no
hurry to oblige the Telangana Rashtra Samiti (TRS). Nor does it seem to be keen to expedite the
Pranab Mukherjee Committee report on the Statehood demand, notwithstanding
frequent deadlines set by the TRS and its chief, Chandrasekhar Rao, now the
Union Labour Minister. Chief Minister Rajasekhara Reddy too is evidently
opposed to the creation of Telangana. He
maintains that the demand for a separate State was the result of the neglect by
the earlier Governments. But now that his Government has launched several
development programmes for the backward region, there is no need for a separate
Telangana.
* * * *
Andolan Agaisnt
Supreme Court
The Narmada Bachao Andolan, led by Medha Patkar and
supported by several NGOs and celebrities, is getting curiouser and curiouser.
It has now turned its agitation against the Supreme Court’s order last week,
allowing continuation of the construction of the Sardar Sarovar project across the river Narmada in Gujarat. Patkar organized a
sit-in outside the Court, describing the order as “injustice” to the people
displaced due to the dam – and subsequently by raising of its height. Patkar has vowed afresh to continue her
agitation. She now accuses the Centre of
making a “mockery” of the rehabilitation of the project-affected
families.---INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|