Defence
Notes
New Delhi, 10 July 2006
India-China
Military Ties
what
About Aksai Chin & Border
By B.K. Mathur
Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee visited China recently
and on return described the trip as “historic”, like other leaders have done in
the past --- K.R. Narayanan, Rajiv Gandhi, Narasimha Rao, Vajpayee, Abdul Kalam
etc. Mukherjee’s interaction with the
Chinese leaders during his three-day visit was described by his Ministry’s
spokesperson as an “important milestone and a major confidence building measure
in the progressive relations between
India and China”. At the end of his talks with his Chinese
counterpart, Mukherjee reportedly stated that India
attached great importance to the “strategic and cooperative partnership with China.” Beijing has
also pledged to step up strategic partnership with India.
The two Defence Ministers have signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU), to institutionalise military training, exercise
engagements and regular contacts among the armed forces, Defence officials and
experts of the two countries. Chinese Defence Minister was quoted as stating in
the presence of Mukherjee that “friendship and mutually-beneficial cooperation
were the fundamental interests of China
and India and were conducive
to the peace, stability and development of Asia
and the world.” Fine words these, politically
and diplomatically speaking. But Indian leaders do not seem to have understood
the Chinese mindset.
Several agreements for peace, goodwill and friendship have
been signed right from the Nehru days. But never have the Indian leaders taken
up seriously the military aspect of the Sino-Indian relations. After all wars are always fought between two
nations for territories, which are captured and surrendered. Obviously,
therefore, the LAC is the main issue
of military confrontation. China has already
occupied about 38,000 sq.km. in the remote Aksai-Chin area Beijing is also holding 5,180 sq.km. in
northern Kashmir, ceded to it by Pakistan. Additionally, China
also claims another 90,000 in India’s
eastern sector. What about these issues
of great military significance, Mr. Mukherjee? Also, has China acknowledged Sikkim
as part of India, as we have
done in regard to Tibet?
As a matter of fact, the top brass
of the Indian Army has always remained apprehensive of the Chinese designs
along the border. Almost at regular
intervals China’s army
patrols are found entering the Indian territory,
claiming as their own. In June 2003,
when Prime Minister Vajpayee was on a goodwill visit to China, a Chinese
patrol stopped Indian intelligence officers at Neimphu in Arunachal Pradesh,
about 14 km inside the Indian side of the border. This was followed by military incursion on
the day Vajpayee was scheduled to reach Beijing. This clrarly highlighted for the umpteenth
time that New Delhi
has failed to get the Chinese to present maps of their version of the LAC,
leading to the border conflicts, which started in 1962 in a big way and has
continued since then.
Vajpayee reacted sharply to the June 2003 incident in the
Rajya Sabha and described it as a betrayal. Remember, he had to face a similar
situation during his visit to China
as the Minister of External Affairs, in the Morarji Government in 1978. China embarrassed
him by attacking Vietnam
and forced him to cut short his visit. This incident could have turned into a
major military confrontation, like the one in mid-80s when the Chinese army had
built a helipad in Sam-Rong
Chu Valley
in Tawang district of Arunachal Pradesh. Even though the Indian Army dismantled
the helipad, the Chinese continued to claim that areas as their’s and set up a patrol
post there, prompting India
to move its 5 Mountain Division to Tawang.
In fact, in July that year, Chinese Foreign Ministry
Spokesman stated that Beijing does not recognize
Arunachal Pradesh as part of India. He accused the Indian intelligence squad for
crossing the LAC. Unfortunately, the
boundary issue, as also the Aksai
Chin occupation by China, have remained unresolved in the Sino-Indian relations,
leading to continued Army deployment all along the border. Officials of the two sides have met several
times since Rajiv Gandhi visited China in 1988.
Yet no peaceful situation. Only diplomatic comfort, even though the
boundary dispute has remained a matter of concern since the Nehru days, as seen
in a prolonged correspondence between the two Governments from 1954 to January
1965.
Nehru had stated at the time of the correspondence with the
Chinese Government, which is contained in eleven White Papers, published by the
Government of India: “It was little naïve to think that the trouble with China
was essentially due to a dispute of
some territory. It has also some deeper reasons. Two of the largest countries in Asia
confronted each other over a large border. They differed in many ways. The test was whether anyone of them would
have a more dominating position than the other on the border and in Asia
itself”. How true today, after the end of the Cold War and disintegration of
the Soviet Union. Attention Mr. Defence Minister.
Two other irritants which affect the Sino-Indian
relationship are China’s military build-up and its military assistance to Pakistan, which has a direct bearing on
Islamabad’s handing over the Indian territory in Pak-occupied Kashmir to China
and Beijing’s gradual occupation of Aksai Chin area. Also, the Chinese Navy is
extending its tentacles in the Indian Ocean with bases in Myanmar and Sri
Lanka. It is also known that Iran,
Pakistan and Syria have funded China’s weapons development programme in the
M-series of missiles. Beijing has
shipped to Pakistan complete M-11 missiles,
capable of carrying about 1100 pounds of nuclear heads and to target up to 300
miles.
China’s military build-up is a matter of great concern to
India, especially when Beijing is racing to become a major world power. That makes it necessary
for New Delhi to resolve the prolonged border dispute and take up territories
in Beijing’s possession, before anything else. History tells us that the Chinese are
sensitive about their border with India and they would not mind another round
of a military operation on the territory issue. Thus, the military angle in the Sino-Indian
relations is important. It makes it
incumbent on India to closely watch China’s military build-up and its
relationship with Pakistan.
Nothing would please one more than the continuance of
atmosphere of peace and goodwill repeatedly created during the last nearly two
decades between the Asia’s two mighty neighbours. But, at the same time, the country’s defence
preparedness has to be kept in mind,
especially when one finds Beijing strengthening its military machines beyond
its requirement and contrary to the international climate. Just see China is spreading its tentacles in
India’s north, east and south --- and expanding and modernizing its army. There is need to talk, and talk effectively,
about India’s territories in the Chinese possession.
Surrender is no victory!---INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|