|
Economic
Highlights
New Delhi, 6 April 2026
India’s
Ethanol Push
FIRMS
GAIN, FOOD & WATER LOSE
By Shivaji
Sarkar
Every crisis in India is fast becoming
a pretext for profit masquerading as reform. The Strait of Hormuz oil crisis
has now been repurposed to justify 20 percent ethanol blending (E20)—pitched as
green and strategic, but structurally unsound. It threatens food, water, and
land security while enriching an industry.
Consumers pay twice: 8–10% lower
mileage and costly retrofits—Rs 20,000–Rs70,000 for each of over 40 crore running
vehicles—turning a supposed solution into a nationwide economic crisis.
The touted energy benefit is possibly
a myth and drain on agricultural resources gigantic.To meet the target, the
country will require about 1,016 crore litres of ethanol annually. Achieving
this would require a shift from sugar and sugarcane—leading to a growing
dependence on maize, broken rice and rice procured from Food Corporation of
India. Estimates suggest that India will need to produce 11–12 million tonnes
of grains, comprising maize and rice, 275 million tonnes of sugarcane, covering
a land area equal to 7.1 million hectares of land.
Experts caution that while high
yielding varieties can help meet the demand, it would also increase reliance on
water, pesticides and fertilizers. According to Mumbai-based IndiaSpend’s
report, the E20 target may not significantly reduce emissions, may harm food
security, and will provide only marginal energy security.
Further, the Institute for Energy
Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) argues that using food-based
feedstocks for ethanol production may not be the best use of land in a country
where hunger remains a pressing issue.In effect, fuel drives would bite into food-producing
lands or forests, burdening the nation’s scarce resources
Not Carbon Neutral
Equally alarming is the water
footprint. Sugarcane in India alone uses ~50 percent of irrigation water.
Producing one litre of sugarcane-ethanol guzzles about 2,860 litres of
water. That is nearly three cubic meters of water for a glass of fuel. In a
water-stressed country, this is catastrophic. NITI Aayog warns that ethanol
expansion could raise India’s annual irrigation demand by 50 billion cubic
metres by 2070 – enough to quench Delhi’s thirst for 17 years. Most
districts in India already face water scarcity. Redirecting scarce groundwater
into fuel tanks undermines farms and drinking supplies alike.
Ethanol expansion in India will divert~7–8
million hectare of cropland, sharply raise water use, and intensify food–fuel
competition, risking higher food prices.Forcing crop-based fuels
can increase overall greenhouse emissions – as seen in the US. More
land clearing and fertilizer use raised carbon intensity of ethanol.
Lifecycle
Emissions: Food Security Under Threat
India is already wrestling with food
inflation and crop shortages. Retail food prices have been above the RBI’s
comfort zone for years. In 2023 poor rains and heat knocked down yields of
staples (wheat, rice, sugarcane). The government banned wheat and sugar exports
and imposed minimum prices on rice to keep markets stable. Against this
backdrop, turning food crops into fuel is perilous.
NITI Aayog estimates ethanol demand
will divert 6.1 mt maize and 5.5 mt rice (~7.1 million hectare), tightening
food supply and raising prices—echoing US Renewable Fuel Standard impacts.
Expanded sugarcane further displaces crops and strains water, undermining land,
water and food security.In short, ethanol endangers three pillars of
security: it eats into cropland, it drains aquifers, and it chips away food
availability.
Who Profits &Who
Pays?
While communities face scarcity,
ethanol producers and associated industries reapprofits, stated to be Rs 20-25
a litre. In other words, ethanol pricing needs drastic cut.
Companies building new unnecessary
distilleries and sugar mills enjoy record demand and generous pricing for
ethanol. In a recent tender for the Ethanol Supply Year
(ESY) 2025-26 (starting November), Indian oil marketing companies
(OMCs) asked for 10.5 billion litres of ethanol, but the domestic
industry offered 17.76 billion litres, far exceeding the government’s
requirement.
This massive oversubscription of over
70 percent highlights a significant structural surplus in India’s ethanol
capacity, driven by over Rs 40,000 crore in investments in recent years for E20
blending.
Industry sustains distilleries through
mandates, quotas and assured prices, branding E20 as “energy independence,”
while effectively socialising environmental costs and privatising
profits—leaving the public to bear higher food prices and water stress.
Backed by floor-ratio-production (FRP)
hikes, mandates, subsidies and post-2022 export curbs, distilleries expand as
citizens bear the burden on food, water and land. When export restrictions hit
sugar in 2022, the sector pivoted to fuel. In states like Maharashtra and Uttar
Pradesh, hundreds of proposals for new ethanol distilleries have sprung up,
bolstered by tax breaks and subsidies.
The higher sugarcane FRP and ethanol
purchase mandates distillery margins. Ethanol stands out as a classic
crisis-with-opportunity: global carbon pressure and oil shocks give industry
cover to expand, even as ordinary Indians pay with their food, water and land.
A False Energy
Transition
Biofuel blending offers only limited
decarbonisation, as crop-based fuels still emit significant carbon and can
worsen emissions through land-use change. It does little to reduce India’s
80–90% oil import dependence, given ethanol’s lower energy density.
Pushing food crops into fuel
production under global climate pressure risks harming food security and growth
priorities. India needs independent, context-driven energy strategies that
balance emissions with equity and development. It must not succumb to global
climate discourse – driven by Western carbon pressure. India’s per capita
emissions remain far below the developed world’s, and its priority must be
equitable growth and food security.
Towards Real Energy
Security
India’s energy crisis reflects policy
gaps, not resource scarcity. Priorities should include boosting energy
efficiency to curb demand, scaling solar and wind as truly indigenous
alternatives, and optimising transport via rail, buses and electric
three-wheelers. Biofuel efforts must focus on waste-based and advanced
technologies that avoid food and water stress. Additionally, green hydrogen
from renewables offers a viable pathway for industry and heavy transport
without burdening farmland.
Ethanol blending should remain
marginal, not central; crop-based fuel risks national resources for limited
gains. Policymakers must avoid short-term optics that create long-term economic
and ecological costs.
India’s strategic goal should be
securing energy and agriculture simultaneously, not sacrificing one
for the other. By all means, use cleaner fuels – but not at the cost of
starving our farms and drying our wells. The true path to energy independence
lies in myopic promotion of ethanol. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|