Political Diary
New Delhi, 12 March 2024
From Your Lordship to Jan Sevak
CONSTITUTIONALLY JUST
NOT DONE!
By Poonam I Kaushish
Now days when you see someone holding his nose you don’t
know whether it’s pollution or politics. Either way the net result is the same.
Increasing political pollution replete with contaminated smog and toxic waste.
But the latest in an ever-growing series of political skullduggery was an
unimaginable onslaught which threatens to undermine the independence and
impartiality of a Constitutional body: Judiciary.
Who could imagine that the man flashing the Constitution,
cracking the judicial whip and doling out unpalatable orders to culprits would
one day succumb to political temptation himself? How else does on describe
Calcutta High Court Judge Abhijit Gangopadhyay somersault from the high
judicial Bench to the rough and tumble of politics by joining BJP last week.
All, for name and fame in the political sun. Never mind if he knocked a big blow
to the judiciary, thumped people’s faith in courts, rapped our moral conscience
and smacked our last resort for justice.
And, this after
accusing a brother judge of “working for a political Party” which marked a low
for the judiciary and relationship between Government and Court in West Bengal
24 January.
Importantly, the
judge’s decision to join politics and manner and context in which it was taken
raises questions of judicial propriety and impartiality. But it also stands out
for three reasons. One, his record in court was full of controversy. Two, for
over two years these controversies showcased an unseemly spectacle of a sitting
judge at loggerheads with an elected Government in a manner that invited
questions of partisanship.
Three, his political
foray will have a bearing on dispensation of justice. Could not millions of
litigants think that a judge was harsh on the Administration on the eve of his
resignation in the hope of reward from BJP?
Take the job scam case
September 2022. While hearing the matter, Gangopadhyay
all but accused Mamta’s nephew and TMC leader Abhishek Bannerjee of “amassing
wealth” to a TV channel. This lack of “judicial propriety” led Supreme Court to
order Calcutta High Court Chief Justice to assign the case to a different
Bench. In January he again overruled a larger Bench in a case regarding
admissions to State medical colleges and made irresponsible remarks against a
colleague.
What Gangopadhyay doesn’t seem to realize is that by
joining BJP he has inflicted an avoidable hurt to an important Constitutional
pillar. A body blow that would not be easy to recover from. Once the
“Conscience Keeper” of democracy falls prey to political sharks, there is no
salvation but a steady slide downhill.
His political foray now casts a shadow over decisions he made on the
Bench. His justification for his political turn to BJP ---- insults and barbs
of TMC leaders holds little water. Even as the Party accuses him of being a
“BJP political worker.”
Arguably, by offering Gangopadhyay a political lollipop,
BJP has violated the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Future judges might
well be more than willing to bend rules in favour of a particular Party in hope
and expectation of reaping political rewards post retirement.
Undoubtedly, it has
divided public opinion and is deeply troubling that an institution that plays
guardian and watchdog of freedoms and routinely sets the agenda for
institutional propriety and probity should be seen to play political
favourites. While supporters say Gangopadhyay has shown courage, critics aver
this is inappropriate while netas
derisively assert the judge has behaved like “a politician.”
Certainly, Gangopadhyay
is not the first judge of a Constitutional court to resign and join politics.
In 1967, former Chief Justice of India Subba Rao venerated for his famous
Golaknath and Kharak Singh judgments resigned three months before retirement to
contest the Presidential election as Opposition candidate. And India’s first
Attorney General Setalvad castigated famed jurist Chagla for accepting Nehru’s
offer of ambassadorship. In 1983 Supreme Court Justice Bahural Islam resigned
six weeks before retirement to contest Lok Sabha polls.
Rajiv Gandhi too
nominated ex Chief Justice India M.H. Beg for Rajya Sabha which threatened to
besmirch judiciary’s fair name was averted when Justice Beg died a few days
before formalities were completed. Prime Minister Modi too followed in his
footsteps by nominating Justice Gogoi to Rajya Sabha in March 2020, snidely
described by Opposition as his reward for Ayodhya judgment.
What to speak of ex-CJI Ranganath Mishra who was Congress’s
Rajya Sabha nominee and Justice Baharul Islam-turned-Congress Lok Sabha MP. Or
Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice Rama Jois turned-Governor- BJP
Rajya Sabha MP and Supreme Court Judge-turned Congress Rajya Sabha MP-turned
Janata Party Lok Sabha MP-turned-Speaker KS Hegde.
Yet again, the country’s first woman Supreme Court judge
Justice Fatima Beevi was appointed member of National Human Rights Commission
post retirement 1992. In 1997, Beevi was appointed Tamil Nadu Governor where
she was in the eye of a political storm over her decision to ignore established
Constitutional norms and anoint AlADMK supremo Jayalalithaa as Chief Minister
2001, notwithstanding she could not contest Assembly poll due to her conviction
in a corruption case
Or ex Chief Election Commissioner Gill to the Rajya Sabha.
I recall, when late Punjab CM Badal remarked that those who held such august
offices should not contest on Party tickets, Gill retorted: “Maine koi theka liya sau saal da”. And
as mithai was distributed he had
conveniently forgotten his halla bol
against the political cesspool and his repeated emphasis on values and
integrity.
Alas, over the years our leaders have eroded judiciary’s
impartiality without outwardly violating the Constitution’s letter. Trust them
to find a lacuna and brazenly exploit it. They merrily take advantage of absence
of “silence” of our Constitution framers, Constitutional or legal bar on those
holding high Constitutional posts from joining politics, fighting elections,
holding office or taking a Government appointment.
This is not all. Post retirement judges have become
Governors. Recall, the appointment of former Chief Justice of India S
Sathasivam as Kerala Governor 2014. India’s second CEC, KVK Sundaram was made
the Chairman of the Law Commission on retirement. Yet again in 1986, the CEC,
R.K. Trivedi, was rewarded with the Governorship of Gujarat within months of
retirement.
Clearly, the BJP does not appear to have been well-advised
in admitting Gagopadhyay. This unfortunate decision can only snowball causing
grave injury to the system unless the statute is changed to bar Chiefs of
Constitutional Offices like CJI, Judges, CECs, and CAG etc from either joining
a Party, accepting further appointment by Government on retirement.
Plainly, such a step is needed to preserve and protect
independence of judiciary since nobody seems to care a damn for healthy and
time-honoured conventions. This is all the more necessary in view of the
“aberration nee pattern” that is slowly but surely seeping into the body
politic --- and is certain to receive encouragement from the Gangopadhyay
episode.
Undeniably, the arms-length distance between Executive and
Judiciary along-with mutual respect needs to remain intact even after demitting
office. If arms length is swapped by a warm embrace, it warns of grave danger.
The moot point is: Can India afford to allow persons
holding Constitutional offices to accept “rewards” from Parties after
retirement? One hopes that
Gangopadhyay case does not became the norm and judges desist from rising to
the bait. This does not auger well for the future of India’s democracy. ------
INFA.
(Copyright India News & Feature
Alliance)
|