Economic
Highlights
New
Delhi, 16 February 2024
Farmers Protest
GLOBAL, GOVT MUST LISTEN
By Shivaji Sarkar
Farmers
are protesting in an election year all over the world. The day the Indian
farmers were made to face severe assault on February 13 and the roads to Delhi
were blocked with concrete walls, barbed wire and spikes; farmers in Brussels clogged
streets, with 1300 tractors, leading to Paris pressing for fairer deals almost
akin to their Indian brethren. They did not face any hostility anywhere, though
agriculture according to Bloomsberg, has become a key battleground in a wider
culture war over money, food and climate change.
The list
of “grievances long - soaring costs, increasing bureaucracy, new European Union
regulations in its Green Deal and imports diluting their markets”. A placard
says: “He who sows misery reaps anger”. What an irony! These farmers are
agitating as the European Union goes to the polls. The government listens to
them without accusing them of politicking. A month back German farmers blocked
highways.
Indian
farmers in Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh travelling to Delhi on tractors
with supplies for a long sit-in, have demands that are similar to the French
farmers. Their placard says, India must quit WTO along with their demands for a
guaranteed minimum support price (MSP), implying that the market must ensure fair
price, food and sustainable farming. While Indian farmers are labelled with
being “supported by Pakistan, Khalistanis and other anti-country forces”, the farmers
in Paris are patiently heard by their government, and they put off protests.
The contrast
is sharp. The government of Haryana state blocked their roads at Punjab border,
fired tear gas shells, lobbed shells from drones. In talks with Union ministers,
Arjun Munda and Piyush Goyal, they have received no assurance on key issues
though the government says agreement reached on ten other issues. They are
alleged to be provoked by the opposition parties, AAP in Punjab and now with
Rahul Gandhi’s announcement of a guaranteed MSP, if his party voted to power,
also the Congress. But for the alleged intervention of Punjab government
officials, situation at Ambala’ Shambhu border could have been worse.
The
farmers have a long history of indignation, particularly in France and the
problems are not confined to Europe. Among the 70 countries going to polls, is
the EU, India and the US. In France, the farmers complain that politicians only
want to get elected, so they are latching onto the farmers movement. Most
politicians and parties keep off them. Even Congress party’s Black Paper on
economy only cursorily mentions them.
The
Manmohanomics of the Congress party is responsible for the beginning of
corporatisation of farming, an aim of the International Monetary Fund and World
Bank. Their successor government has been following the Manmohanomics and only
aggravated the issues of marketing. In 2006, during the UPA government, Bihar
abolished the mandis or APMs. It closed procurement. Punjab farmers rush to
Bihar, buy food grains, ship it to Punjab, sell at MSP and earn profits. Bihar farmers
suffer.
During
the past few years, many long marches have been held by farmers even during UPA
government, as also long dharnas during the NDA, as along Delhi borders with Haryana
and UP in 2022. The similarities are stark. In Europe, farmers have been
holding protests in Italy, Spain, Switzerland and Romania. Polish farmers have
vociferously opposed food grain arriving from neighbouring Ukraine and forced
the government to negotiate. In Delhi, government blocked roads to check
farmers entry to the national Capital, in Germany farmers blocked highways in
January for a week against cuts in subsidies on diesel.
Indian
farmers, so far, did not even protest petrol and diesel prices that are almost
double that of international crude prices. They even did not protest against
auto-lobby-NGT sponsored illegal seizures of their ten-year-new cars and
tractors, for which they paid EMIs for seven years. They suffered takeover of
their land for building of roads for irrationally high tolls. Climate issues
for grain, horticulture or fish farmers are wrecking them.
Climate
change is a big issue for European and US farmers. Though the governments there
may not be that intent on the issues, they are not hostile. A US retired
diplomat Hegadorn is quoted as saying, “You can live without an electric car,
you can live without a mobile phone, but you’re not going to live without
farmers and the food they produce”. Sensible approach in a country that has
only a miniscule percentage left as farmers. Corporatisation of agriculture has
neither helped the farming community in Europe nor in the US.
In
contrast, India has over 54 per cent left in agriculture or over 75 crore
people. Since the last farmers agitation two years back, withdrawal of three
supposedly anti-farmer laws, the government has continued with the
Manmohanomics and heaped miseries on the farmers. It should not be obsessed
with the factor that they are agitating during election time. World over it is
so.
The
farmers are being neglected and overlooked in policy framing from the richest
US and European countries to the poorest India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. In all
these countries while corporate profits swell, farmers wages remain stagnant
for decades. Their input costs on seed, fertilisers, machines or pesticides multiplied
everywhere.
Economic
Survey of 2016 says farmers income was Rs 1700 a month. This as per National
Statistical Office was Rs 10218 a year or about Rs 2000 a month as per Rajya
Sabha statement in December 2022. Market-linking of agriculture or
corporatisation in the prevailing circumstances has failed in the affluent
countries. In the US, farmers complain they are being priced out by big
companies.
Those
advising in India that it could be a success are apparently misleading policy
planners. More sensitivity is required. Farmers the world over are agitating
not because there are elections, they want patient hearing for solving the
global crisis.
Delhi
belongs to all countrymen. The government should invite the farmers with open
arms and not with spiked roads. If attended, it is easy to solve as promising
guaranteed MSP would not burden the exchequer with more than Rs 2.5 lakh crore (trillion)
of additional expenses, which the government agencies recover as they sell the
food grains. Listening in any regime is an asset.---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|