POLITICAL DIARY
NEW DELHI, 21 January 2006
CBI In The Dock
AUTONOMY? A BIG
JOKE!
By Poonam I Kaushish
Question: name India’s premier investigating
agency which is now-a-days a political tool of the powers-that-be to play
favourites, give clean-chits or hit opponents?
A clue: the agency can also double up as a fool-proof surety
for law enforcers to merrily become law breakers.
Answer: of course, the Central Bureau of Investigation. Today,
derisively called the Congress Bureau of Investigation.
One has only to see the sordid flip-flops and
somersaults by the Government, its Law
Minister and the CBI in la affaire Quattrocchi to know what I mean. It all
started about a fortnight back when an enterprising channel exposed how the
Manmohan Singh Government’s law officers had bent every rule in the book and
craned everyone’s imagination to favour the fugitive Italian businessman. Whose
two claims to fame are his proximity to the Sonia Gandhi (or to the “Gandhi
family”, as he puts it) and his involvement in the Bofors scandal.
True, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has laboured very hard
to dispel the impression that the CBI was acting under his Government’s
pressure. In two written statements in a span of three days, he has vouched for
the agency’s “autonomy” and asserted that no stone would be left unturned to
probe Q’s complicity, if any, in the Bofors deal. Said he: “My Government has
never interfered with the CBI …. The autonomy of the agency will be preserved.”
Really, Mr. Prime Minister?
It is another matter that he broke his silence after the CBI
took a U-turn to blame itself for Law Minister Bharadwaj and the Additional
Solicitor General Dutta’s culpability, contrary to what it publicly asserted once
the scandal broke. Recall, the CBI fielded its Joint Director and significantly
not the Director at a hastily-convened Press Conference to announce that what the Government’s law
officer had communicated to the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), namely to ‘defreeze’ the Italian businessman’s
account was, in fact, the Agency’s own view. Furthermore, there was no
hanky-panky by the Government in ‘exorcising’ Quattrocchi in the Bofors scam.
Notwithstanding, the e-mail made public by the CPS of the advice it had received
from none less than the Law Ministry itself on 23 December last.
This scandalous development, needless to say, has unwrapped
for the umpteenth time India’s
best known secret: the CBI is a convenient hand maiden of our polity. Worse, it
has again raised serious doubts about its honesty, integrity and impartiality
in weeding out corruption and criminality.
It is today seen as a toothless tiger which is used by its political mai-baaps to bale out their friends and
settle scores with opponents. Making a mockery of autonomy, independence and
impartiality.
Two former CBI directors, Joginder Singh and Karthikehan,
stare the view that there is no such thing as autonomy in the true sense of the
term. It has a fallacy. For two reasons. One, the agency is under the
administrative control of the Government and is at present directly under the Prime Minister. Two, CBI officers
are wholly dependent on their political bosses for their careers ---postings,
transfers and seniority. If they please them they are liberally rewarded in
various ways, including extensions, foreign postings and even berths in statutory
bodies.
Why has its credibility suffered – and suffered so
greatly? The answer lies in the CBI’s
genesis. It was set up in 1941, during World War II. But it acquired a legal basis for its present
structure only after the enactment of the Delhi Special Police Establishment
Act of 1946. This provides for direct
recruitment for the CBI from a Constable to the Dy. Superintendent of
Police. Senior officers of the level of
Superintendents of Police and above, however, joined the CBI on deputation from
the State cadres of the Indian Police Service and were engrained in the
doctrine of “establishment protection”, as envisaged in the Police Act of 1861,
which continues to hold good even today.
Is the CBI more sinned against than sinning? Are politicians the main culprits? Is the pot calling the kettle black? The truth is mid-way. Both work in tandem in furthering their own
interest. Consequently, the system
becomes self-perpetuating. Over the
years, the threatened political elite has given more and more powers to the CBI
to have their way and say. Thereby
sullying the agency’s reputation replete with its inability and “failure” to
back up charges with required evidence.
Witness the notorious hawala case where the redoubtable amicus curiae
still talks of having been let down by the CBI.
Almost alleging between the lines the Bureau’s ready willingness to let
off a whole bunch of politicians across the board, including those who had
confessed to taking money from the Hawala
kingpin Surendra Jain.
Worse, the CBI seems to have adopted a brazenly
opportunistic policy of playing safe in a situation where governments have been
changing fast, courtesy revolving-door politicians. Thus, raising a big question mark over its
honesty and integrity, as also on its willingness and commitment to serve the
national cause by putting self before the country.
Sure, it has come a long way from a low-profile unit into India's premier
sleuth-shop with more than 5,000 officers spread across the country. The
black-marks against it are many: investigations are below average; it doesn’t
recover much loot and its legal arm is nothing to write home about. Also, most
cases are built on incomplete documents, unavailable witnesses and inability to
pursue leads overseas, which slows the process. More often than not, it finds
itself being reprimanded by the courts for not moving quickly enough. What to
say of a sluggish judiciary and cumbersome court proceedings which has made our
people lose faith in the CBI.
In an era where political image has come to be branded like
detergents, quick-fix solutions are sought for chronic maladies. Times out of number our netagan seem to be seeking only an image rectification through
cosmetics, instead of a complete makeover as recommended by the National Police
Commission of 1977, headed by the much-respected late Dharma Vira, formerly
Cabinet Secretary and Governor of Punjab, West Bengal and Karnataka and
including one of India’s top policemen, K.F. Rustamji.
The Commission observed: “The supremacy of the Rule of Law
should be clearly spelt out and police should be guided by the Law of the Land
only and they shall have the legal option to disregard all instructions running
contrary to that.” At the crux is the
issue: Who should control the CBI? The
Government or an independent body? Needless to say, a Catch-22 question for our
power-greedy polity to honestly answer and for us to stupidly expect.
Witness the sweet irony.
When Vajpayee was the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha in the
late 1990’s he had demanded an independent CBI and even promised one if he came
to power. But Vajpayee the Prime Minister not only conveniently forgot his
promise but continued to retain the CBI under his charge, just as his
predecessors had done. Originally, the Department of Personnel and the CBI was
under the Home Ministry, initially presided over by Sardar Patel. But Indira
Gandhi was eager to concentrate all instruments of effective power in her own
hands brought it under the Prime Minister. Manmohan Singh is happily following
the tradition. Over the last year and more he has talked ad nauseum of weeding out corruption, But he has done little to make the CBI truly autonomous and independent.
An agency that inspires confidence.
Unfortunately, the CBI has always been kept out of bounds
and treated with kidgloves. In fact,
even Parliament has not put it under its eager microscope, despite frequent
ruckus in both Houses on several CBI-related matters. The last time the agency was given a cursory
glance was in 1994 by the Parliamentary Standing Committee of the Home Ministry
and its report thereon. How
lackadaisical is the Government’s attitude can be gauged from the distressing
fact that the report continues to gather dust.
Knowing our polity and its hypocritical culture, we will no
doubt continue to hear hopeful noises or even be treated to some cosmetic
measures. But it is absurd nonsense to
say that the CBI cannot deliver and be set right. It surely can. However, this requires clear
and firm political will. First and
foremost, appointment of the CBI Director should be truly above board and with
a fixed tenure. He should be selected on
the basis of genuine expertise,
integrity, competence and commitment.
The CBI Chief should
have no political affiliation even remotely, lest he is dubbed as the Prime
Minister’s hatchet man. His impeccable record would go a long way in establishing
the utility and credibility of the agency down to its rank and file. This would ensure an impartial, just and
unbiased assessment of all important cases.
And, bring in the much-needed accountability to inspire confidence among
the disgusted public.
A basic question that needs to be answered is: Will the CBI
be guided by the law of the land only or by the Government of the day. The powers-that-be must desist from playing
further havoc with the CBI and converting it into a “Central bureau of convenience,
connivance and corruption.” The moot point is: Who will cast the first
stone? “Kiski laathi aur kiski bhains?" ---- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|