Round The World
New Delhi, 20 October
2023
Israel-Hamas War
HOW THE WORLD REACTS
By Dr D.K. Giri
(Secretary General, Assn for
Democratic Socialism)
The Israel-Hamas war is escalating every hour causing
pathetic loss of lives, property and resources. The bombing of a hospital on
Tuesday last, that wiped out 500 or so lives has shaken the conscience of the
world. Both sides are blaming each other for this human catastrophe. Hamas
claimed that IDF -Israel Defence Forces – has bombed the hospital whereas
Israel asserts it is one of Hamas rockets that fell on the hospital by
accident. Palestine sympathisers say the
western press supporting Israel is manipulating the news coverage, putting out pro-Israel
news and clips. To be sure, the truth will come out sooner than later.
Be that as it may, there are threats by other countries
like Iran to jump into the fray through their mercenaries, Hezbollah’s unless
Israel stops bombing. A few calls for ceasefire are also made but not heeded by
either of the warring parties. Political debates and protest demonstrations in
favour of both Israel and Palestine are staged across the world. Heated
arguments in social media are raging on up and down our country. Let us engage
with them.
What is missing in such discussion so far is the impact of
Israel-Palestine war on Indian politics mainly the national elections next year,
should the war continue in some form or the other until then!Let us pontificate
on it. Unlike previous conflicts between Israel and Palestine, or to be
precise, Hezbollah and Hamas, there were no fierce moral arguments over who is
right or wrong; whether proportionality of retaliation has to be acceptable
etc.
Furthermore, the situation has become complex this time
around as both Israel, namely IDF and Hamas (Palestinians) are perceived to be
both victims and perpetrators at the same time. Hence the reactions from
countries – world powers, allies, friends, and onlookers have to be carefully
thought out and assessed.
In any conflict or war, there have been mainly two kinds of
reactions as the world has been divided into two camps since the Second World
War. Arguably, the power equation has changed after the disintegration of the
Soviet Union in 1992. Some would say it has been a ‘unipolar’ world since. It is
America and its allies –Europe and NATO – calling the shots.
Even if it has been largely the case, China emerging as the
second largest economy has begun to flex its muscles, in a quest (mainly of Xi
Jinping) for world supremacy. It seeks to provide an alternative to western
model of world politics. China calling a conclave at the time of writing
(17&18 October) of about 130 countries in the wake of Israel-Hamas war
testifies the foregoing assumption. That is, China is strategising to assume
the role of a world leader.
Again, the world seems to be increasingly divided into two
blocs; one led by USA and the other by China, Russia tacking on behind the
latter. Admittedly, this scenario does not yet exist in its fullness as China
has not been able to blow the bugle. Whether it can do so despite Jinping’s
irresistible irredentism is a matter of reality-check.
Yet another group of countries especially of the former
Non-Alignment bloc push for a multilateral order with a new strategy of
multi-alignment. They bid for reviving the Global South as another axis of
world politics. I have argued more often than not that the idea is untenable,
not endorsed by history. Reiterating the voice of Global South on the world
table is understandable and advisable. But creating a third force in the form
of Global South is a far cry when the politics is driven by the measure of
security.
Having put the countries into three blocs although two of
them – one China-led another largely India-led – are inchoate formations, let
us look at their reactions to the Israel-Hamas war. America and its allies have
clearly sided with Israel in the face of the terrorist attacks by Hamas. They
support Palestinian civilians on humanitarian grounds. The European Union has
not stopped the aid to Palestine. At the same time, the US President has
requested a sanction of 100 billion USD from the Congress to support Israel and
Ukraine.
China and Russia refused to condemn Hamas’ terrorism while
asking for a peaceful settlement of the two-nation solution. Other countries of
Global South have made neutral statements calling against civilian casualties
and for ceasefire etc.
How has India responded? India’s prompt reactions came from
the Prime Minister himself in his tweets as he declared New Delhi’s support for
Israel against the Hamas’ terrorism. It was quite different from the neutral
postures New Delhi has been taking in Ukrainian war. It is rightly so at least on
two counts. First, India is consistently and steadfastly opposed to terrorism
as a means to resolution of differences or conflicts. Second, Israel is a
reliable friend of India, more than any country at present. It has also been
historically proved on two critical occasions, 1962 war with China and Kargil
war with Pakistan in 1999. However, New Delhi soon nuanced its response by
reiterating its long-standing position on Palestine becoming an independent and
sovereign state.
Normatively, foreign policy of any country is run on
consensus. But in democracies, there is room for diverse perspectives. The
Opposition parties in India mainly the Communist and Congress seem to have
sided with Palestine. That has been the stand of the Congress for long time,
the Communist go for any event that is against the US and its allies and
supports Chinese position. Congress support for Palestine has been attributed
to the so-called vote bank politics, seeking the Muslim votes. That may not be
entirely true.
But the moot point one should raise is who provoked this
war? The Hamas attack evokes the horror of the holocaust. The Palestine has a
just cause. The whole world should support it. There must be a détente between
Israel and Palestine. But can we endorse terrorism as a method? Some would
argue that Israeli state (IDF) has equally been a terrorist state. Let us have a
conversation on whether Israel has the right to defend itself, or as the
argument goes, it has unleashed terrorism on Palestine. How do we define
terrorism? Israel is a democratic state, has a government constituted on the
basis of elections.
On the impact on Indian politics, the Congress party seems
to have misplaced its reactions. It should have supported Israel when it faced
terrorist attacks. Indians would not condone terrorism as they have been its
victimfor years on end from across the border. We should be focussing on the
cause of the war not just the consequences. In any case, the bloodshed must
stop, so should the Hezbollah’s and Hamas and their ilk elsewhere. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature
Alliance)
|