Economic
Highlights
New
Delhi, 7 August 2023
Communal Violence
RIOTS COST INDIA $646 Bn
By Shivaji Sarkar
Communal
violence has a cost. Manipur may be far off from the National Capital, Delhi,
or Nuh in Haryana may be just 60 km or so off, but incidents impact global
reckoning, investment flows and overall losses.
The recent
violence in Nuh has jolted the Gurugram-based multinational and Indian
companies. As a caution they have gone back to work from home as they perceive
that the State government has reneged on maintaining law and order and faltered
on checking violence, around 30 km away. If mosque burning and its imam’s death
in Sector 70 is included, it is a mere 25 km away.
When it
comes to safety, Noida is a better choice than Gurugram. Statistically, the
crime rate in Gurugram is higher than in Noida. Hence, young people and
families are increasingly choosing Noida over it. Recall that during the lockdown
many companies shifted away from Gurugram.
The
Global Peace Index (GPI) produced by Sydney-based Institute of Economics and
Peace notes the country has a dismal rank of 72. The 2020 violence has cost
India $646 billion, enough to fund most of its budget expenditures and welfare
programmes. Its ranking improved to 126 in 2023 but then various flare ups that
happened in the country since the Karnataka polls had not occurred.
The
average economic impact of the ten most affected countries by violence was
equivalent to 34 percent of world GDP, the report says. The economic cost of
violence in India in constant purchasing power parity (PPP) terms in 2017 was
$806.2 billion, or 9 per cent of the GDP. The Delhi riots in 2020 were one of
the most violent incidents of the recent past, which saw wide bloodshed, unrest
& loss of lives. The East Delhi region was engulfed in communal riots,
resulting in death of about 53 people.
The economic
cost of Indian violence is as much as 6 per cent of the GDP. In 2021, farmers
protest, the Lakhimpur case were some of the significant violent acts that took
place. In the last decade, India has been a victim of several protests against
government policies, curfews, internet shutdowns apart from various big terror incidents
such as the Mumbai attacks and bombings in many cities.
Over
2,900 cases of communal or religious rioting were registered in the country
between 2017 and 2021, Union Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai said in a
reply to a question in Rajya Sabha in December 2022. Citing National Crime
Records Bureau data, he said a total of 378 cases of communal or religious
rioting were registered in 2021, 857 in 2020, 438 in 2019, 512 in 2018 and 723
in 2017. Uttar Pradesh tops the list with the highest number of reported
crimes in 2023. The State’s population size and socio-economic factors
contribute to its elevated crime rates, a reason for large number of shifting
by industries from western UP, despite being a big hub. Even Honda closed its
car manufacturing there.
As much
as India is a shining case of unity in diversity, several innocent people die
each year due to communal violence. Every year there are more riots. In 2017,
822 incidents of communal violence were seen killing 111 people. Religious
intolerance is on the rise. The year 2019 saw cow vigilantes take to mob
lynching against the beef-eating and cattle-trading communities in India. Delhi
saw anti-citizenship amendment bill protests which turned into violent riots
where not only were people killed but women also raped mercilessly. Religious
riots are not new.
Communal
riots decidedly affect the economic conditions. Businesses shut down, people do
not go out of their homes, thus even the bare necessities and transport falls.
Long-term violence leads to deterrence in investment and destruction of
property. After the Gujarat riots 2002, the investments flowing into the State
had seen a decline.
India’s
neighbour – Pakistan stood at 5th with 8 percent loss amounting to $80,303.
China is at 138th with one of the highest losses of 4 percent or
$1,049,173. This is contrary to the image that China portrays as a peaceful
society. Labour unrests as per GPI is very common in China despite a command
structure.
An
observation by Sriya Iyer in her book The Economics of Religion in India
notes that economic growth also increases inequality and polarisation, which in
turn incites religious conflict. She says that this is the root cause of
conflicts between Hindus and Muslims in the country. Economic growth leads
to a greater spirit of competition among businesses. The 1991 Varanasi riots
and 1984 Bhiwandi riots were reportedly caused by this phenomenon, according to
PR Rajgopal in his book Communal Violence in India. This syndrome leads
to power conflicts.
In the
South Asia region, or the Indian subcontinent, the economic impact of violence
has risen to $1.27 trillion in 2019, the highest level ever recorded for the
region. The Economic Impact of Violence report 2021, also by IEP found
that since 2013, the impact has increased almost every year. The region
consists of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri
Lanka and is the second least peaceful after the Middle East and North Africa
and has one of the widest disparities between its most and least peaceful
countries.
The 2020
GPI mentions South Asia deteriorated in peace owing to falls in peacefulness in
Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Afghanistan. The economic impact of violence in the South
Asia region is largely due to military and internal security expenditure and
costs arising from armed conflict and terrorism.
Undoubtedly,
it’s a complex syndrome. The historical rivalry between Kukis and Meiteis in
Manipur or Hindus and Muslims in Nuh in Haryana continues for reasons beyond
religion, but it ignites the passion that social rivalries find difficult to
express. The ascendancy of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad has more to do with this
power syndrome in Haryana and so the feeling of superiority among the Meiteis
in Manipur. Religion in both the places is being a conduit of expression. Even
feeble formal dialogue between the communities has been blocked by religious
passion.
Political
parties try to reap benefits to exploit the local resources through their crony
business houses. Whether it would benefit them for the 2024 polls or not is
difficult to say. If dialogue is not resumed it can definitely hurt the
delicate social fibre and critical economic well-being. Efforts for resumption
of dialogue either in Manipur or Haryana remains a pipedream. The jolt on the
economy is bound to be felt. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|