REWIND
New
Delhi, 22 June 2023
DARJEELING MODEL OFFERS A WAY OUT
By Inder
Jit
(Released
on 22 August 1989)
Thoughts
in New Delhi are now turning towards a national agenda for the new Government
after the next general election. These will come to be embodied in due course
in the poll manifestoes of various parties. But a race is already on in
one-upmanship in a bid to win and influence the voters. Mr Rajiv Gandhi
announced last Tuesday in his Independence Day speech from the ramparts of the
Red Fort at least one item for the agenda: speedy and inexpensive justice to
the people. Earlier, on August 7, he told the Lok Sabha: “We look forward in
the next Lok Sabha to thoroughly revamping the cooperative movement which...
has run aground on the shoals of upper class domination, mismanagement, malfeasance
and worse. We are also conscious of our work in the Panchayats being unfinished
because we have not dealt with the nyaya panchayats... This work will be
a major priority for our Government in the Ninth Lok Sabha...”
Justice
surely deserves to be given high priority and made speedy and inexpensive after
four decades of pious promises. The cooperative movement, too, requires special
attention as part of what Mr Gandhi has described as the “grassroots
revolution.” But an item which deserves even higher priority is the need to
take a fresh look at the political map of India as part of the current exercise
of giving more power to the people. Well over 30 years have rolled by since
Nehru and Pant redrew the political map on a linguistic basis in the light of
the recommendations of the States Reorganisation Commission in 1956. Much has
happened since then. We now have 25 States as against some 12 then. The ethnic
principle, too, has been accepted. Nagaland and Mizoram are today full-fledged
States. The demand for more states has, meanwhile, grown. This is reflected in
the clamour for Jharkhand, Bodoland and Uttarakhand. Even Ladakh now seeks
separation from Jammu and Kashmir.
That
has fortunately been taken off the Jharkhand issue. The leaders of the
Jharkhand movement have agreed to join a tripartite committee to resolve their
demand for a tribal homeland. Likewise, the trouble in the Bodo areas of Assam
has been defused, thanks to a fresh initiative for talks by the State’s Chief
Minister, Mr P.K. Mahanta. A fresh opportunity is thus available for finding
peaceful solutions of the two problems even though both the issues are
complicated. The sizeable Jharkhand State, as demanded for the past 30 years,
would have to be carved out of four States Bihar, West Bengal, Orissa and
Madhya Pradesh. The demand also has economic implications. Two-thirds of the
revenue of Bihar, for instance, is said to come from its Jharkhand area. The
demand for Bodoland bristles with its own difficulties. The Bodos, I am told,
do not have a majority either in Khokrajhar district or in the adjoining Udalgiri
sub-division.
The
tribals of the Jharkhand region and the Bodos have two options open to them. To
agitate and press for separate States irrespective of the consequences. Or, to
accept a practical solution in their own best interest and that of the nation at
large. The first option is not likely to take them very far in the few months
available between now and the general election. No Government at the Centre can
concede new states instantly or on an ad hoc basis ignoring its countrywide
repercussions. Any move to redraw the political map of India, howsoever
desirable, will have to be undertaken cautiously. The issue of reorganisation
is highly emotive and, unless handled wisely, could create no end of problems
as in 1956. The leaders of the Jharkhand movement and one of the Bodos,
therefore, need to take a pragmatic view of the overall situation and seek a
solution which would meet their basic demands and aspirations at the earliest.
The
Darjeeling model offers a practical way out. The demand for a separate State of
Gorkhaland carried great force. The Darjeeling Hills were sorely neglected and
its fine people given a raw and rough deal. Darjeeling was once known as “the
pride of the nation.” Yet it was reduced over the decades to a position where
it could be described best as “the shame of the nation.” The creation of a
separate state of Gorkhaland involved one State alone: West Bengal. Additional
justification for the GNLF demand was provided by the fact that a plea for
Darjeeling's separation from Bengal was made as far back as 1907! Nevertheless,
the GNLF leader, Mr Subash Ghisingh showed wisdom and settled for an autonomous
Hill Council. The Council, no doubt, falls short of a full-fledged State.
However, it gives the Gorkhas and others in the Hill area the power to manage
their own affairs. Under the model, the West Bengal Government retains only law
and order and general administration.
Bihar
took an important step in 1980 or 1981 to give its tribals a better deal during
the Chief Ministership of Dr Jagannath Mishra. Three separate Development
Authorities were created for North Chota Nagpur, South Chota Nagpur and Santhal
Parganas, covering a tribal population of some 60 lakhs. Each Authority was
headed by the Chief Minister as Chairman, with a tribal leader, nominated by
the Government, as its Executive Vice Chairman. The three Authorities were also
given Executive Committees of five members each, comprising Ministers. Each Authority,
Dr Mishra tells me, was given a discretionary grant of Rs 40 lakhs. In addition,
they had at their disposal funds allotted by the Planning Commission in the
State’s Sub-Plan for development of the tribal areas. (These totalled some Rs
115 crores in 1983.) Dr Mishra also sought to give the tribals a better deal.
All class IV jobs and sixty per cent of the class III jobs in the area were
reserved for the tribals.
Ironically,
Dr Mishra’s scheme became defunct once he ceased to be the Chief Minister in
August 1983. Little, I am told, was done by his successor, the late Mr Chandra
Shekhar Singh. The record of Mr Bindeshwari Dubey, who took over as the next
Chief Minister in 1985, was no better. He nominated the Executive Committees
for the three Authorities only towards the end of 1987. This, however, proved
of little avail as Mr Dubey was moved to the Centre early in 1988 and was
replaced by Mr Bhagwat Jha Azad. The latter held the office of Chief Minister
for a year. But the Executive Committees for the three Authorities were not
nominated during his time. All this neglect over the past six years has
embittered the tribals and given strength to the Jharkhand movement. Dr Mishra,
who is presently the Pradesh Congress-I Chief, has now thoughtfully proposed
that the three Executive Committees should hereafter be elected, not nominated.
Interestingly,
Bangladesh closely followed the demand for Gorkhaland and the evolution of the
Darjeeling model. In fact, it recently applied this model to its troubled
Chittagong Hill Tracts, where the tribal Chakmas have been fighting a 16-year
hit-and-run war in a determined bid to achieve political, cultural and economic
autonomy. President Ershad, I learn, even acknowledged this fact at an informal
meeting with Mr Rajiv Gandhi during the SAARC summit. The Chittagong Hill
Tracts have been given representative local government in the three districts.
The Chairmen of the District Councils, who are to be elected from among the
tribesmen, have been given enough powers to rule their districts. Indeed, as
President Ershad told Mr Gandhi, Dacca has even improved on the Darjeeling
model to make it acceptable to the Chakmas. The 31-member District Councils
have been empowered to raise a local police force upto the level of
sub-inspectors.
The
problems in many more areas in our country can be resolved by applying the
Darjeeling model which, as I said earlier, essentially enables a people to run
their own lives without having to create new States. “The Darjeeling model
offers a solution to our problem in Uttarkhand”, Mr B.D. Pande, former Governor
of West Bengal, told me in Almora late in June. The tribals of Jharkhand could
also be given similar autonomous Councils not only in Bihar but also separately
in West Bengal, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh. Ultimately, the new Government after
the general election should seriously consider the question of carving the
large and unwieldy States like UP, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra into smaller
units in the interest of enabling the people to get a good, responsive and
efficient Government. In the meantime, it should at least give the people
agitating for separate States in various parts of our country the Darjeeling
model, made possible by the statesmanship shown by Mr Gandhi and Mr Jyoti Basu.
--- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|