Open Forum
New Delhi, 19 April 2023
State & Hate Speeches
POLITICS-RELIGION COMBINE
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
It is
indeed tragic that social relations, specially in urban areas, have reached
dismal levels. The bondage that existed in society has been virtually lost, largely
due to bad politics,spewing hatred and jealousy perpetuated by politicians and
fringe elements. It is not surprising then that at national level leaders may give
great sermons but when it comes down to brass tacks, they are rarely interested
to ensure that people in the lowest segments of society, who struggle for
existence, are at least assured of a decent and peaceful life.
It is in
this connection, the Supreme Court’s recent verdict terming the State ‘impotent’,
for failing to rein in hate speeches across the country gains credence as it
clearly pointed out that the toxicity could be ended only when politics and
religion are segregated from the national discourse. “Every day, fringe
elements are making speeches to vilify others, including on TV and other public
forums. The problem arises when politicians are mixing politics with
religion.The moment politics and religion are segregated, this will come to an
end. When politicians stop using religion, all these things will come to a
stop”, a bench of Justices K.M. Joseph and D. V. Nagarthana observed, while hearing
a contempt petition against various state authorities for failing to register
FIRs against those making hate speeches.
The
question asked was “Why cannot people of India take a pledge to not vilify
other citizens or communities?” And addressed the question “What is tolerance?”
To the court, the answer was “itis not putting up with somebody but accepting
the differences.” The bench decided to hear the petitions because States are
not acting in curbing hate speeches. In an indirect hint to hate speeches,
specially aimed at Muslims, the SC further pointed out that such are like a
vicious circle. “One person will make it and then and another person will make
it. Now these are cracks coming up in the idea of fraternity.There has to be
some restraint. Some sort of mechanism has to be developed by the State so that
we can curb these kinds of statements”, Justice Nagarathana observed.
While we
talk of liberal outlook in our social relations, it has been found that Indians
generally stick to their own religious group when it comes to their friends. In
a major new Pew Research Center survey of religion across India, Hindus
overwhelmingly say that most or all of their close friends are also Hindu. Of
course, Hindus make up the majority of the population, and as a result of sheer
numbers, may be more likely to interact with fellow Hindus than with people of
other religions. But even among Sikhs and Jains, who each form a sliver of the
national population, a large majority say their friends come mainly or entirely
from their small religious community.
Political
analysts believe that our uneven feudal, social structure has kept us separated
and we have always been a fractured land. the need to control, dominate – even
decimate – the assumed enemy or usurper has remained an active switch. The
occasional eruptions disturbing communal harmony since independence were
treated as geographically specific and limited periods. Each one was informing
us that we are at war with ourselves and unless we address this internal
strife, it will consume us. In such a situation, we should not be
surprised that hate and anger dictate lives. But this cannot continue for long.
The RSS and the BJP are being accused of helping spread this animosity with
elan. Moreover, our language is offensive, filled with jabs and attacks. In the
name of resisting the offender, we covertly sanction revenge. When governments belonging
to our side of the political aisle commit blunders, perpetrate violence, sell
our people to major corporations, there is silence.
At the
ground level, however, communities are not in conflict. The pew survey found
many Hindus (45 percent) say they are fine with having neighbours of all other
religions – be they Muslim, Christian, Sikh, Buddhist or Jain – but an
identical share (45 percent) say they would not be willing to
accept followers of at least one of these groups, including more than one-in-three
Hindus (36 percent) who do not want a Muslim as a neighbour. Among Jains, a
majority (61 percent) say they are unwilling to have neighbours from at least
one of these groups, including 54 percent who would not accept a Muslim
neighbour, although nearly all Jains (92 percent) said they would be willing to
accept a Hindu neighbour.
Delving
into the crux of the matter, it may not be wrong to believe that politicians
are trying to disturb social relations between communities by highlighting
religious issues. Religion, as is generally agreed, is a very personal affair
and this should not stand in the way of our social relations. If everybody
believed that all paths, propagated by different religions, lead to the same
Supreme or as Swami Vivekananda in his famous Chicago address talked of the
need for religious unity, much of the animosity that is witnessed today would
not be manifest.
Political
consciousness may be good in understanding the nature of our polity but
bringing religion to the forefront and spreading jealousy and hatred is
obviously detrimental to socio-economic growth. Apart from Mahatma Gandhi, who
has written extensively on his understanding of Hindu religion and the
influence of other faiths, and believed that religion or spirituality must
unite mankind, there have been other political leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru,
Sardar Vallabhai Patel etc. and philosophers like Dr S. Radhakrishnan, all of
whom embraced various religious communities. They emphasised the need for
communal harmony and building fellow feeling in society.
The need
for such harmony is essential in a pluralistic society where people from
various religious communities live and work. But unfortunately, society
has been polluted by religious rivalry and a fundamentalist attitude, which
puts a question mark on the intent of the ruling dispensation. It leads to the moot
question, why is it that only the people from the impoverished sections are
affected by such actions that lead to violence and communal frenzy. The broader
question being asked by sociologists is that unless societal bonds are
strengthened, the innate growth of the individual and of the community cannot
prosper.
Thus,
the present judgment of the apex court should be a sharp warning that religion
and religious fundamentalist ideas and beliefs would have to be separated from
politics. It is easier said than done as political parties today want votes in
the name of religion and religious nationalism, which is disintegrating society
and leading to chaos and violence. Those leaders who brag about India’s
development and achievement fail to realise that a sectarian approach in a
secular state cannot bring in real development. Moreover, those who swear in
the name of Mahatma Gandhi should hang their heads in shame as distorting
religion and dividing the community cannot keep people happy and build
communitarian amity. It is time for the State to act in time. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|