Home
 
Home
News and Features
INFA Digest
Parliament Spotlight
Dossiers
Publications
Journalism Awards
Archives
RSS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Women’s Rights:CURB RELIGIOUS INFLUENCE, by Dhurjati Mukherjee, 11 April 2008 Print E-mail

People & Their Problems

New Delhi, 11 April 2008

Women’s Rights

CURB RELIGIOUS INFLUENCE

By Dhurjati Mukherjee

 Since end-90s women’s rights have become one of the major themes on the agenda of the United Nations and other international organizations. This is not to say that the UN had earlier completely ignored women as its Charter did contain the principle of equality of rights for both men and women. The need for gender equality and ensuring women their due rights has become a major challenge today, specially in Third World countries, where  education and awareness levels are low affecting them the most.

Significant gender disparities continue to exist in three basic regions – South Asia, Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa. Although the constraints of conservative, patriarchal practices, often reinforced by religious values are increasingly recognized as a drag on development, empowering women is still considered a subversive proposition. In some societies, women’s rights are at the frontline of a protracted battle between religious extremists and those with moderate progressive views. Deep tensions have been evident in Pakistan, Nigeria and Indonesia.

In the 20th century, the UN has sponsored four global conferences on women – at Mexico (1975), Copenhagen (1980), Nairobi (1985) and Beijing (2000) and used the deliberations to help shape its agenda of action to foster gender equality. In 1993, the General Assembly passed the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women. In 1999 it adopted the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. At the dawn of the new millennium, the UN demonstrated its priority towards women’s rights by making empowerment of women and promotion of goals of gender equality as one of the eight Millennium Development Goals proclaimed at the Summit in September 2000.  

The respect for religious liberty and for basic human rights has been at variance and, in most cases, governments are pressurized by religious leaders not to give women their due place in society. Often government authorities pretend to engage with the problem thus trying to satisfy religious groups as they are more powerful than women. However, in the same breadth assuring that something needs to be done for women’s rights. It’s like one cannot but agree that religions threaten basic human rights, especially of women, but that religious discourse has been the source of support for human rights world over.

Although it is difficult to distinguish between a religion and the cultural traditions that surround it, the Hindu, Islamic and Confucian traditions have all with some plausibility been accused of denigrating the value of female life. In the name of religion, women’s rights have been at the centre of attack. While Hindu fundamentalists have not allowed women their social and economic rights, in the case of other religions it is possibly worse. Imams have been opposing women’s rights to maintenance in the name of shariat, while a section of the Church opposes reforms relating to marriage, divorce and property rights for Christian women. Similarly, Sikh fundamentalists demand a personal law to deprive Sikh women from inheriting property.

An investigation from a social and cultural standpoint would reveal political influences in shaping and re-shaping religious tradition. For example, the Islamic fundamentalists espoused by the Iranian regime have little in common with the tolerant and pluralistic form of Islam found in the writings of Al Beruni, who traveled in India in the 11th century or with what was preached by the Mughal emperor, Akbar in the 16th century. Islam contains fundamentalists who are virtually intolerant of other religions but it also contains some of the earliest expressions of toleration and transcendence of sectarian boundaries. In the South Asian sub-continent, Muslims include liberals and conservatives, but with the latter in majority and more vocal.

Nothing is more important to women’s life than education. With literacy and social consciousness, a woman becomes enlightened enough to take her own decisions and to some extent shape her future. In India, the adult female literacy is around 52 per cent, which is much more than the neighbouring countries but less than China where it’s about 75 per cent. It is only in recent times that education of the opposite sex is being encouraged in a big way, in urban and rural areas to make women self-reliant, aware of their rights, have an understanding of social issues, including religion, and discard whatever has no scientific basis.

While Christians have always a given lot of emphasis on girl’s education, Hinduism too talks of the need for such education. But Muslims in India as also in countries like Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia continue to neglect women’s education, if not at the secondary level but definitely at the higher levels.

Let’s take another issue. The question of a uniform civil code in the country has for long been the subject of much discussion and debate though its enforcement has yet not been possible. By placing the directive that the State shall “endeavour to secure” a uniform civil code in Article 44 of the Indian Constitution among the unenforceable Directives of State Policy, the framers expressed an opinion that it would be unwise to move against existing personal laws hastily. In Constitutional debates, Muslim leaders had repeatedly held that retention of the personal laws is “a part of the fundamental right to religious freedom”. The words “endeavour to secure” were chosen deliberately. The idea being the State should gradually prepare the people to accept a uniform code at a future date.

No religious group can possibly maintain a separate system of law that either violates the basic rights of the citizens or involves religions in asymmetry viz another. And, if this is guaranteed then the case for “permitting religions some latitude in areas such as marriage and divorce may at least be argued”. One can no doubt conclude that all religions are plural, contain argument, dissent and also the voice of women in varying degrees, which invariably hasn’t been heard.

In a statement in July 1998 to the UN Economic and Social Council (and also several times later), the World Bank questioned whether there were ways in which an adjustment process could be designed and complimented to minimize the difficulties experienced by low-income and deprived groups, such as women and emphasized the need to pay more attention to their health. With statistics in hand --that women represent 50 per cent of the world population, one-third of the official labour force, perform two-third of all working hours for which they receive only one-third of world income and own less than one per cent of world property—the Bank statement observed that “development cannot advance far if women are left significantly behind”.

If education and awareness among women can be improved, religious commitment would automatically then be examined from a scientific and realistic perspective as well as from the obligations of citizens in a liberal democracy. Women need to be given a proper place in society and allowed to live a dignified existence that would ensure her all basic human rights. In most developed countries, women have through education and equal opportunities become equal partners in society, whereas in the Third World this can become a reality only if the religious groups shed their fundamentalist moorings and create the right atmosphere. Remember, in the coming years, the women’s role will become increasingly important in the sphere of real development. --INFA    

 

(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)

< Previous   Next >
 
   
     
 
 
  Mambo powered by Best-IT