Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 10 April 2008
Financial Sector
CRYING FOR REFORMS
By Dr. Vinod Mehta
(Former Director, Research, ICSSR)
With
the economy achieving a growth rate of over eight per cent for the past four
years, it’s time to complete the financial sector reforms, especially in
banking. Whether the Government can gather enough courage to draw a map for such
reforms at a time when General elections appear to be looming large, is highly
doubtful. But, it must remember that reforms in the industrial sector will
remain incomplete without wide-ranging reforms in the financial sector.
In
the past few years, both the insurance and banking sectors have been thrown
open to the private sector players, but the public sector banks and insurance
companies continue to play a dominant role. In fact, the public sector units
are responding well to the competition by private players and may just maintain
their dominant position. At the same time these banks and insurance companies
are also expected to play a major role in sustaining the over eight per cent
growth rate.
Following
economic liberalization over a decade-and-a-half ago, there has been resistance
to reforms from employees in the financial sector. They fear they would soon become
redundant as the public sector units would not be able to match competition
from foreign firms. However, the reforms that have been initiated till date in
this sector have belied all these fears, but opposition from the employees
still continues. One may or may not accept it, but the fact is that the era of
mega banks and insurance companies is here to stay. And, the Indian financial sector has to
prepare itself to this change.
The
reforms would need to be tackled simultaneously at four levels: one relates to
the public regulation of these companies, two, organizational structure within
these companies, three, changing the psyche of the employees and lastly technological
upgradation.
While
we open up the financial sector to private business, both Indian and foreign,
we must ensure that there is a stringent regulatory mechanism in place for all
kinds of financial companies such as banks, insurance, chitfunds etc. A sound regulatory mechanism as well as an early
warning system can check any financial fraud at the first stage itself. Such a regulatory mechanism should have
statutory powers to deal with the compliance to financial regulations
independent of the Government. Remember,
if the regulatory mechanism were in place the Global Trust Bank, the first
private sector bank after the economic reforms, would not have failed a few
years ago. Besides, we also need to guard
against sub prime crises of American banks.
A
corollary of stringent regulatory mechanism could be the standardization of
accounting practices and single format for preparation of balance sheets,
profit and loss account, income and expenditure account, etc. for all financial
companies.
As
for the insurance firms, the regulatory authority is already in place and for
the banking sector we have the Reserve Bank of India. However, it is more
advisable to have a separate cell or body within the RBI with statutory powers
to oversee the functioning of the banking sector especially with a view to
tackling problems of unpaid loans and financial frauds as in the case of
cooperative sector banks.
The
second aspect of financial reforms is the organizational structure. In both the
banking and insurance companies this has become outdated. The Government’s hierarchical
system has been superimposed on them. Such a system not only adds to the
relative service costs but is also responsible for delays in taking appropriate
decisions. As against this, the new
banks in the private sector, which came up after the economic reforms, have different
organizational structures, which are much leaner and more efficient.
This
holds true for the public sector insurance companies too. Let’s say, the use of
computers in keeping policy records of insured persons, has gained currency in
big cities, but the bulk of work in small towns and villages continues to be done
manually. In most private sector banks almost all the front desk work is now officer-oriented
with a limited chain of command between the lowest and the highest ranking officers. This is something, which our nationalized
banks and insurance sector would need to do to survive the competition from
private financial companies.
The
third set of reforms relate to the employees’ attitude towards its
customers. Even though there were a large
number of banks in the public sector there was never really a competition among
them, as they were following the same policies, offering same products and had
the same wage/salary structure for the whole of the banking industry. There was no system of reward or punishment. And it is perhaps for this reason that bank
employees by and large treat their customers with contempt. This attitude needs to change drastically.
Employees must be customer-friendly. While some staff at certain bank and
insurance branches has changed attitude towards customers, in most cases they
continue to be far from pleasant. Therefore, in the new environment, there is
need to develop a training programme to change staff attitude towards customers
if they wish to survive in a highly competitive era.
The fourth aspect of reforms relates to the technological
base of our existing banking and insurance companies, if these are to survive
competitive business. Even though a few banks and insurance branches have been
computerized in metropolitan cities, technology in our financial companies is
still outdated-- most work is still done manually. It is thus not surprising that there are scams
all the time, but are discovered only a year or two later. It’s not enough to scrutinize bank branches
alone. All banking activities must be integrated not only within the bank
branch itself but also with other branches, regional offices, head office,
insurance companies etc, and ultimately with the RBI. All this requires a high quality of reliable
financial management package for the financial companies.
Sadly,
most of our banks don’t have such packages. While in other countries, one can
do all the transactions at one counter, here one has to go to separate counters
for each banking transaction. In some cases, the same bank may treat the same
customers differently. For instance, let’s
take the case of the State Bank of India. At the Delhi International
Airport foreign exchange
counter it takes just a few minutes to change currency -- no forms need to be
filled, only give your passport and the foreign currency and get the money
changed. Whereas, at the SBI main branch
on Parliament Street,
foreigners are asked to fill up forms and write each currency note number on
the reverse of the form. A customer has to wait for a good ten to 15 minutes to
change currency as all this is done manually! Why different requirements by the
same bank?
In
fact, recent technological advances have made a bank branch or an insurance
branch meaningless. With integrated financial packages one can process any
transaction from anywhere in the city, or country, or even abroad. Electronic banking has today made the mode of
payment through bank draft or cheque simply obsolete – within moments one can
make and receive payments. A customer can well sit at home or office and
conduct all banking operations including buying and selling of shares, and mutual
funds. But all banks are yet to provide such facilities here. So, in sum we need to speed up financial
reforms if we want to help the present growth rate in the economy. ----INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|