Rewind
New
Delhi, 29 September 2022
CREDIBILITY MORE THAN UNITY
By Inder Jit
(Released on 22 December 1981)
Opposition unity is in the air
again. Everyone is talking
about the Janata Party’s recent decision to “bring together the Opposition
forces” and revive the 1977 spirit --notwithstanding the cold water poured on
the proposal by some leaders of the ruling party and several political pundits.
More and more people are again beginning to realize that a strong Opposition is
vital for good government and the well-being of our democracy. In fact, the
Janata Party’s public image has improved following its Ahmedabad conclave. Not
a few persons, including Congress (I) supporters, feel that both Mr. Morarji
Desai and Mr. Chandra Shekhar deserve a hand for resolving their differences
and taking a timely initiative. There is widespread disenchantment with Mrs.
Gandhi’s Government today. Even prominent Congress (I) MPs concede this and are
deeply concerned. However, they feel reassured on one score. There is no
alternative to Mrs. Gandhi at present. A nationwide opinion poll is almost
certain to favour her continuance as Prime Minister by an overwhelming majority.
Many among the Opposition
understandably question this view and argue that there are many alternatives to
Mrs. Gandhi. But the truth is that most of them have destroyed their
credibility and public image by their unprincipled and opportunistic actions.
Only three party leaders can be said at present to have something of a national
standing and enjoy a wide measure of respect --- outside the narrow confines of
communal and caste politics. They are: Mr. Morarji Desai, Mr. Chandra Shekhar
and Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee. All three are in demand and draw big crowds,
although Mr. Vajpayee’s appeal is still largely limited to the urban areas and
some rural pockets where the RSS cadres have worked quietly and earned popular
goodwill. At the same time, none among the three is strong enough individually
to pose a challenge to Mrs. Gandhi’s leadership and provide a credible
alternative. Consequently, there is desire all round to see the Opposition
leaders put country before self, reassess the national situation and find ways
and means of tackling it effectively.
Considerable surprise has been
caused by the decision of the Janata Party and the Lok Dal to join hands and
work for the unity of the Opposition forces. But there is really no occasion
for it. The Lok Dal adopted a resolution on the subject in October. The Janata
Party, for its part, has come a long way from Sarnath when, in February last,
it decided to rebuild itself as “a viable and desirable alternative” to the
Congress (I). It then clarified that it would not seek to do this “merely by
merging with the other parties or seeking summit alliances or soliciting the
support of individuals who seem to be adrift from their former moorings,
particularly those who have taken a leading role in bringing down the Janata
Government.” But a new pragmatic approach was adopted
by the Party’s National Executive first in Bangalore in May and then in
Hyderabad in August. It cleared the decks for seeking cooperation from and
extending support to the other Opposition parties for the furtherance of
struggles against “authoritarianism, injustice and exploitation.” No party or
leader was to be treated as an untouchable.
Simultaneously, the idea of
meaningful opposition unity has been pursued on several fronts ---quietly and
publicly. Following the Janata’s Bangalore conclave, Mr. Chandra Shekhar held a
meeting of 12 Opposition parties on electoral reforms. (An agreed report is
expected at an early date.) Not long thereafter, Mr. Devaraj Urs, as the
Congress (U) President, informally proposed a merger of the Janata, Lok Dal and
his own party. Both Mr. Chandra Shekhar and Mr. Charan Singh reacted coolly.
However, Mr. Urs persisted and eventually got the two to agree to a quiet
meeting of the four Presidents, including Mr. Vajpayee of the BJP. The meeting
was held on August 4. But Mr. Charan Singh failed to come as his pulse was
missing a beat. Instead, he send Mr. Madhu Limaye, who acted like a bull in a
China shop and played havoc --- first in the meeting itself through some
astonishing proposals and then by unauthorisedly disclosing in Bangalore on
August 9 that the four parties had decided to merge. This was untrue and caused
several explosions all round.
Mr. Chandra Shekhar and his close
colleagues did not allow this to dishearten them. They quietly pressed forward
with their ideas of unity in action, ultimately culminating in the Ahmedabad
resolution. Happily, for the party and for all those interested in having a
strong Opposition, Mr. Desai and Mr. Chandra Shekhar, who met quietly for 40
minutes during the conclave, came to agreed conclusions and the draft
resolution was adopted unanimously after a few changes. (Contrary to many
stories, the draft resolution did not propose merger.) At one stage, it looked
that Mr. Limaye might once again succeed in playing the arch splitter. Prior to
the Ahmedabad meet, he wrote “a nasty” 11-page letter to Mr. Desai, which could
easily have put the former Prime Minister’s back up against having anything to
do with the Opposition. However, Mr. Desai and others at Ahmedabad saw through
“the conspiracy” and refused to do anything which might break the Janata and
enable the Lok Dal to take it over, together with its name, which is today
widely coveted among the Opposition parties.
Too much is being read into both the
Janata’s Ahmedabad resolution and the joint statement for Mr. Chandra Shekhar
and Mr. Charan Singh. Neither should be viewed in terms of an outright merger.
The Janata draft resolution spoke originally of the need “to forge unity among
the Opposition parties to provide an effective national alternative”. But this
was changed to “bring together the Opposition forces to provide an effective
and credible national alternative.” The original draft sought to authorize the
President “to take all steps.” This was changed to “necessary steps.” Further,
a new para was inserted to give a philosophical content to the final resolution
and clarify that the approach was not opportunistic. The new para emphasizes
the importance of struggle and unity of action against authoritarianism for
rekindling the 1977 spirit. Significantly, the joint statement of Mr. Charan
Singh and Mr. Chandra Shekhar only talks of joining hands to work for the unity
of the Opposition forces. Further, it talks of not only providing a viable
national alternative but also one that is credible.
What does all this mean in terms of
brass tacks? Only the broad philosophy and principles have been enunciated. Mr.
Chandra Shekhar and Mr. Charan Singh are now expected to appoint small
committees in their respective parties to come to grips with the ways and means
of bringing together the Opposition forces and rekindling the 1977 spirit. The
Congress (S) President, Mr. Sharad Pawar, who boldly welcomed the Janata
Party’s unity resolution, has also announced his decision to set up a committee
to talk things over with the other parties. Some among the Janata leaders would
have been happier if the three Presidents had not opted for committees. Such
committees inevitably lead to negotiations, terms and conditions and the quota
system. However, they hope that the three committees will rise above petty
considerations and take a broad view in the best national interest. Further,
the committees could also prove a blessing if they give due thought to advocating
steps to ensure that the new unity sought to be forged again is not wrecked
easily --- as in 1979.
Various stories going the rounds
would have us believe that the Janata’s Ahmedabad resolution on unity was
adopted unanimously on the understanding that some top leaders or “party
wreckers” would be kept out. Three lists of five, seven and eleven names are
even mentioned. My own probing confirms what Mr. Chandra Shekhar has already
stated. There is no such black list or condition and the President has been
authorized fully to go ahead and bring the opposition forces together. Mr.
Desai did sound a note of caution at the National Executive meeting. He had
been fooled in the past, he said, and had no wish to be fooled again. If this
happened once more, it would be his own mistake and he would then prefer to go
home. In the National Council meeting, he expressed identical sentiment and
added that if necessary he would retire from public life rather than join any
other party. Importantly, he left Mr. Chandra Shekhar in no doubt at their
separate meeting that he was not taking a rigid view. He was willing to accept
a reasonable proposition since he had full faith in the Janata and its future.
Most Opposition leaders are now
beginning to appreciate a basic point which many of us have been making over
and over again. Unity and solid unity is undoubtedly important. But unity by
itself cannot deliver the goods, as shown by the recent by-elections to the
State Assemblies. The Opposition put up combined candidates in Masarak in Bihar
and in Balapore in Maharashtra. The Congress (I) won hands down and the
Opposition candidates lost their deposits. Another combined Opposition
candidate was knocked for a six at Dumbani in Bihar. Interestingly, one
combined Opposition candidate belonging to the BJP won from Khijri in Bihar.
However, I gather that this had more to do with the BJP’s image. Much good work
is said to have been done by its cadres in the area. In Gujarat, the BJP has
won six of the eight recent by-elections --- five to the Assembly and three to
the Rajkot Corporation. Not surprisingly therefore, the BJP has no interest in
losing its identity. It prefers to leave merger to parties with “single
membership, not dual.” But it is prepared to have functional unity, electoral
understanding and, if necessary, even join a coalition Government.
Fortunately, there is increasing
recognition among the Opposition leaders of the importance of credibility. This
is reflected both in the Janata’s latest resolution and in the statement of Mr.
Charan Singh and Mr. Chandra Shekhar. In the past, the Opposition talked of “a
viable national alternative”. Now the formulation is “an effective and credible
national alternative.” (Viable, according to Chambers’ Dictionary, means
capable of living, surviving, germinating and hatching!) The Opposition, as I
have said before, would do well to learn from the breakaway Social Democrats in
Britain. Their new party, together with the Liberals, has in a short time won
the confidence of the people who are increasingly getting tired of both Labour
and the Tories. This is reflected in the grand triumph of Mrs. Shirley Williams
in a parliamentary by-election from Crosby, destroying a huge Tory majority. In
sum, top leaders of the Opposition will have to first win back the people’s
trust before they can hope to challenge Mrs. Gandhi successfully. They must
come out in sack cloth and ashes for their past sins and publicly take a vow
that they shall go home rather than break the party again. Credibility alone is
crucial. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|