Political Diary
New Delhi, 12 July
2022
Market
For Defectors
POLITICS OF OPPURTUNISM
By Poonam I Kaushish
In the monsoon season it’s raining Party
splitting. One doesn’t know who is sleeping with whom and who is jumping from
one bed to another, as friends and enemies are all rolled into one. After all,
attracting and accepting elected legislators seems to be the easiest and
fastest strategy to come to power. Worse, in these artificially made
alignments, we are persuaded to believe that ends justify means. Undeniably,
defections are the new black of political morality.
First of the mark was Maharashtra’s Shiv Sena
where Ekant Shinde split with 40 MLAs dethroned the Thackeray-NCP-Congress led
MVA and formed a Government with Fadnavis’s BJP. With both factions proceeding
to disqualify MLAs opposed to them, Supreme Court stayed proceedings till
formation of a new Bench.
Add to this, 16 Party MPs have asked
Thackeray to support NDA’s Presidential candidate while four petitions are
pending before the Court. Besides disqualification, one has challenged the
“illegal” summoning of Assembly by the Governor, another the Speaker’s order
removing Thackeray MLAs from posts of Party leader and Chief Whip and fourth
Speaker recognizing the whip nominated by Shinde.
In Goa the pendulum swings from Congress to BJP
as 6 MLAs out of 11 disassociated from the Party but to avoid action under the
Anti Defection Law need another two on their side to cross over. As of now BJP,
reportedly behind the break-up has put merger plans on hold till the requisite
number and post Assembly session.
The ensuing days are bound to unfold more political
liaisons which promise to be full of intrigue, double-talk back-stabbing etc by
defecting MLAs along-with Parties, symptomatic of today’s polity. Thereby, exposing
the hollowness of their political commitment to satiate narrow selfish ends for
power to the exclusion of ideological and ethical considerations.
Remember last year West Bengal and Puducherry
were plagued by defections, while 2020 stands testimony to brazen horse-trading
with senior Congress leader Jyotiraditya
Scindia along-with 22 loyalist MLAs joining BJP resulting in Kamal Nath’s
Government downfall and coronation of
Shivraj Chauhan’s as Chief Minister.
Ditto in Karnataka 2019 when 15
Congress-JD(S) MLAs switched to BJP, kicked out Kumaraswamy’s Government and
installed Yediruppa’s Sarkar.
Notwithstanding, fundamentally violating the democratic principle: Voters’
rights to choose their Governments via the ballot box. Again 4 TDP Rajya Sabha
MPs out of 6 attached themselves to BJP and 10 of 15 Congress MLAs jumped ship
to BJP in Goa with three sworn as Ministers. And this was all legal since it
met the Anti- Defection Law’s two-thirds limit.
All classic instances of a deep flaw in the
Tenth Schedule which allows one-third members of a Legislative Party to split
without inviting the disqualification tag. Think, Congress and TDP had not
split nor it’s Legislature and Parliamentary Party or Lok Sabha MPs so how
did 10 MLAs and 4 MPs constitute a merger? In 2017 BJP came to power in Arunachal
after Chief Minister Khandu switched loyalties
Reminiscent of 1967 Aya Ram Gaya Ram culture when Gaya Lal a Haryana Independent MLA switched three
Parties in 15 days. Followed by Bhajan Lal who hijacked his Janata Party
Government to Congress, thereby opening the floodgates of defection and
institutionalizing it through Indira Gandhi’s 60s-80s.
During 1967-1983 Parliament saw 162
defections and State Assemblies 2,700 with 212 defectors rewarded as Ministers
and 15 became Chief Ministers, according to PRS Legislative Research. Several
of them did so more than once, some even five times. One MLA defected five
times to be a Minister for only five days. Their purchasing price governed by
the law of diminishing returns. Elucidated by JMM’s Suraj Mandal in Lok Sabha
1993, “Paisa boriyoin mein atta hai!”
All, with clinical precision devoid of
pretensions, of ‘meeting of minds’, principles or personal fondness. Patronage, opportunism and a share
of the power pie is the glue that keeps the swarm of hoppers together with its
new benefactors and makes incongruent Parties come together
whereby poaching of legislators is extolled as smart political management:
money for allurement, use of State machinery for intimidation etc are commended
as resourcefulness.
Questionably, is defection a Constitutional
sin? Yes, averred Supreme Court in Uttarakhand Chief Minister Rawat’s case
2017. Stating “unholy treacheries are masked as tacit mergers or wholesale
defections.” But are Constitutionally accepted thanks to political compulsions,
politics of convenience and opportunism facilitating them.
Consequently, with Parties multiplying like
amoeba, splits have become the rule whereby it is easier to ‘buy’ a legislator
than fight polls and where paper tigers sell their political soul to the
highest bidder are dubbed as survivors not defectors taking giant strides as
king makers in the political nautanki.
Sure, one can say this is what democracy is
all about. Changing Parties is a part of politics. But we must distinguish
between politics of principles and politics without principles. Of dedicated leaders not ram-shackled
fair-weather partners in corruption and crime. The ‘Conduct of Politics’
necessitates reliability, integrity, credibility, conviction and courage.
Besides, are short term gains worth long-term
costs? Can one brush away this display of naked careerism as admiration worthy
of a political cause or cynically accept it? Is it a deliberate conspiracy to
create defects in the law to facilitate defection based manipulations and
strategies?
Clearly, with the present law unable to
control defections, reduce money impact and lure of office we urgently need to tighten
and plug glaring loopholes in the Anti-Defection Law, notwithstanding, it
tantamount to implementing a legal solution to solve a political problem.
Our lawmakers need to change the Tenth
Schedule and elucidate defections in the parent Party or its legislative wing
and which constitutes a split? The requirement of a preceding split in the
organizational Party could prove an effective deterrent. Clarify what is a
candidate’s status if he ditches his Party pre-election and joins the rival can
he be liable for disqualification if elected?
True, law does not prohibit defection but not
only should a legislator stand disqualified but also disallowed to contest
polls for 10 years as by defecting he has subverted the peoples mandate.
Presently, even if a defector is denied ministerial and remunerative posts, he
can be rewarded in cash and kind for his support.
What next? It is a long trudge as there seems
to be no one who dares to bite the defection hand that feeds it. Specially as
we have an infamous genius for driving a coach and six through any law. Politics
without ethics is dangerous for democracy as it is produces distrust at all
levels where-under even the gutter seems cleaner than today’s politics. It
remains to be seen if in the bheed of
opportunistic turncoats, the murmur of ideology, beliefs and honesty will find
favour. Gaddi and Gaddari must not go
together. -----INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|