Political Diary
New Delhi, 2 November
2021
India’s Moral
Terrorist
HONEY,
WE ARE TOUCHY!
By Poonam I Kaushish
One man’s food is another man’s poison. A succinct testimony to
the ongoing maelstrom over growing intolerance. From love jihad, to anti-Pakistan sports protests to advertisements
celebrating India’s pluralism and inclusivity et al. Resulting in nationwide
churning, notwithstanding, Prime Minister Modi’s views, “Placing individual
ideologies before national good is wrong.”
Last week the ugly face of an intolerant bully India was again
on display when
three Kashmiri youths were arrested for celebrating Pakistan’s victory over
India in the T20 cricket match by UP police. And Chief Minister Yogi attacked
Samajwadi’s Akhilesh Yadav for his “Talibani mentality” by comparing Sardar
Patel and Jinnah as “India’s freedom struggle icons.”
Madhya
Pradesh’s Home Minister Mishra stripped India of open-mindedness, equilibrium
and tolerance when he made a consumer goods giant withdraw a Karwa Chauth advertisementcelebrating progressive marriage view
featuring a lesbian couple. And, a famous designer’s “obscene” Mangalsutra billboard which portrayed a
woman wearing a low-neckline dress posing intimately with a man. Big deal if it
aimed to talk about empowerment.
A
film maker was assaulted during shooting of his web series in Bhopal with
Mishra reading the riot act for “hurting Hindu religious sentiments.” A clothing
brand was accused of “defacing” Diwali by naming
its festive collection Jashn-e-Riwaaz.
A jewellery brand was forced to discontinue a commercial which showed a
baby shower organised by Muslim in-laws for their Hindu
bride.
Predictably,
some BJP MPs, Bajrang Dal and Yuva Morcha called these “insults to Hindu culture,
Abrahamisation of Hindu festivals” and averred companies must face economic
costs for deliberate misadventures. Worse, was social media trolling for “unnecessarily uplifting secularism and
Muslim ideologies” claiming it hurt their religious sentiments. Sic.
What
our netagan seem to forget is that
there is something called Article 19 which states: “All citizens shall have the
right (a) to freedom of speech and expression…” Raising a moot point: Is India
hurtling towards an era of political intolerance and Hindutva values thrust
down our throats? Is the polity afraid of clash of ideas in public life?
Over
the past few years there has been an increasing sense that space for liberal
discussion is becoming narrower shown by repeated incidents of threats,
lynching and banning by self-appointed censors.
In 2015, 12 film-makers and 41 novelists, playwrights and poets returned
national and Sahitya Akademi awards to protest “growing intolerance” and for remaining
silent on murder of well-known rationalists.
Certainly,
India’s pluralistic society has seen religious disturbances whereby right forces
have overshadowed the idea of a liberal, tolerant society, but never before has
anyone felt that the country is treading the dangerous path of religious
polarisation as now. A
new Hindu assertiveness and so-called cleansing of Western cultural influences
is steadily gaining ground, whereby intolerant forces, propped up by leaders are
determined to put rationalists and liberals in their place.
Consequently,
freedom of speech is under siege forgetting that disparagement too helps enrich
discourse. According to last year’s survey 54% youth agreed intolerance amongst
young people had increased, but 32% disagreed. In Pew report on Social Hostilities
Index of 198 countries India ranks “very high" 8.7 out of 10 along-with Syria,
Nigeria and Iraq.
The
Supreme Court too expressed anguish over growing bigotry in society wherein organised
groups pose serious danger to right to free speech and expression of contrarian
views. “The purpose of art is to question and provoke” it added while imposing
Rs 20 lakh fine on Mamata’s Government for disallowing screening of a satirical
film.
Alas, the political class exploits the
common man’s emotions and only looks at what will help popularize it more with
its vote bank. The Government appears to be encouraging this by looking
the other way, even if this amounts
to cultural terrorism and intolerance. The judiciary too is not acting
firm.
Look
at the dichotomy. Hinduism is the most tolerant religion in the world yet some leaders
and rabid elements by their rigidity to social mores, communal hatred, unwillingness
or refusal to tolerate or respect people, opinions or beliefs contrary to their
own and religion per se portray any
criticism as anti-Hindu.
Clearly,
the speed with which our tolerance is falling to fragile levels is scary. The
Centre and State Governments cannot pass the buck to each other for ongoing
madness. Questionably, why are politicians’ discourses becoming more and more
venomous and toxic? Are we so paranoid or intolerant that any outpouring is viewed
as a threat to Hindu culture or nation? Is the Government, Centre or State crushing
free expression?
Have we lost the
ability to accept criticism? Bordering on a narcissist phobia? Is it mere
coincidence or a sign of an increasingly knee-jerk, reactionary country where
one is forced to go public about a frown? Why should a Minister foist his
personal views on the citizenry and State? One cannot live life in the slim
strip called official wherein every joke, wit, satire, humour or defiance is treated
as a monster.
The truth is even as
we have achieved political and economic freedom we remain hostage to errant
elements of society. “Lopsided economic growth has created a dispossessed
population which cannot relate to Western cultural values and norms,” asserted
a social scientist.
In a mammoth one billion plus country there would be a
billion views and one cannot curtail people’s fundamental rights. It is
imperative for the public to decide. We do not need self-appointed guardians to tell
us what we can see, read, wear, eat or drink. We should be free to believe what
we want, whom and how we should love, worship the way we want.
NaMo needs to tell his Partymen and Ministers specially
in BJP ruled States to stop being touchy about everything which they feel goes
against ‘society’ norms, is anti-Hindutva and anti-national. India is renowned
for its cultural values and long tradition of cultural tolerance. We need to
shun our moral terrorists.
India
could do without netas who distort
politics and in turn destroy democracy and laughter. The polity must realize
the ramifications of their actions and think where does India go from here? Our
leaders need to heed the democratic
strength of a nation is assessed by how its citizens can freely express their
thoughts and views despite being caustic to the ruling dispensation or those
who are majoritarian. By forbidding, threatening, arresting or slapping charges
of sedition against citizens the notion of intolerance has only been strengthened.
Criticism of Government is not sedition.
Time to recall Winston Churchill’s words: “Criticism may
not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfils the same function as pain in
the human body; it calls attention to the development of an unhealthy state of
things. If it is heeded in time, danger may be averted; if it is suppressed, a
fatal distemper may develop.” ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature
Alliance)
|