Spotlight
New Delhi, 16 October
2021
Religion
of Man
IMPROVE
SOCIETY, NOT DIVIDE
By
Dhurjati Mukherjee
Religions, according
to sociologists, are supposed to help us reconcile to our limited knowledge of
the universe and create a cohesive community, which could be controlled by set
codes of behaviour and give a purpose to life. It is in this sense that
modernity as an idea could be classified as a religion too, in orderly and
judicious governance of society. The new religion of life, highlighting Mahatma
Gandhi’s philosophy, admits the autonomy of the individual but with the sole
purpose of consuming material goods and services and electing the best people
as representatives to modulate society and government in the right direction
with political and economic choices
The main engine of
change has been provided by science and technology. During the past 200 years,
there has been amazing series of developments in our knowledge and
understanding of the world. Obviously, science has emerged as the new religion
that has the power to change all other religions. Humans are using technology
to create a better life for themselves and society. There are also negative
fallouts. It is estimated that around 40 per cent of all jobs may be lost in
the coming years. The overwhelming majority of people would become, not like
the new proletariat that emerged around 200 years ago but, a completely
economically redundant class with possibly no skills with which they can
contribute to social production.
However, the question
that remains why do we see a sharp rise in the old world religions and a desperate
clinging to the past? In spite of modernity and development of science and
technology, there is simultaneous growth of fanaticism among religions. In
India also, fanaticism among Hindus has grown rapidly in the last few years,
whose clamour for ram rajya, in the strictest sense of the term, is
manifest all over the country.
It is indeed
surprising that fairy tales that have no basis but couched in religious
moorings are being propagated by the party in power. Obviously, this is a
political ploy to win over uneducated Hindus, most of whom are poor and
impoverished and the State has failed to provide them due socio-economic
benefits except some solace in a new definition of religion. But does this new
definition find acceptance among philosophers and scholars who are engaged in
research on religion and human values?
The right to a better
life or the quest for human development has obviously to be the topmost
priority among governments. As this quest has failed in India, the political
class has started exploiting the uneducated in a non-conventional manner by
inculcating a false sense of religion being linked to nationalism. This needs
to be criticised by all academics, litterateurs, scientists etc. all over the
world where fundamentalist religious forces are trying to inculcate a false
sense of nationalism and trying to divert attention of the suffering
masses.
The secular spirit of
human beings is steadily fading away. This has been leading to fragmentation of
society and disturbing human relations, which is essential for the healthy
growth of society. The income inequality that is manifest in most Third World
countries, including India, is finding reflection in social relations as well.
Obviously, this
brings us to the need for a universal religion as also unity of all religions
that was propagated by none less than the greatest Hindu protagonist, Swami
Vivekananda, who voiced this at the famous Chicago conference in the year 1917.
This left philosophers and religious leaders spellbound because, for the first
time, the need for universal religion and unity was being articulated by an
unknown Indian priest.
At such a juncture
when uplift of humans through basic development is imperative, false notions of
religions are being spread to divert attention. In fact, the nation is
experiencing the political rise of the majority’s religion with its new forms
of domination and subordination. Number of politico-religious gurus are ready
to push the willing towards the altars of the supernatural superpower. Those
who are in the business of doing such things are enemies of inclusive social
growth and strong bondages that can lead to a cohesive communitarian society.
In an age of reason,
we are unfortunately moving more towards an age of blind faith. Societies based
on blind faith are bound to be violent with centralised power and ancient laws
that regulate everyday lives. Faith based beliefs invariably come from
unchanged ancient texts which are considered holy, though these are most
probably written by ancient tribesmen with very little knowledge about the
physical world. Today, the texts are considered holy precisely because they are
old and ancient but lack reason and justification. These are far away from
practical laws of physics and biochemistry, which present logical evidence of
the being of the universe and the emergence of life and its subsequent
evolution.
It is yet again time
to inculcate Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy to unify religions with members of
both communities working together for social development. As he himself stated:
“I do not expect India of my dreams to develop one religion that is to be
wholly Hindu or wholly Christian or wholly Mussalaman, but I want it to
be totally tolerant, with its religions working side by side with one another”.
For Gandhi, religion has no place in politics and there has to be clear
demarcation between religion and politics.
Gandhi's religion of
man was not confined to temples, churches, books, rituals and other outer forms
or bound by any formalities. He had said, God may have a thousand names as
Ishwara, Siva, Vishnu, Rama, Krishna, Jehovah, Christ, Allah etc. according to
the traditions in which a man is brought up and wondered "Is there one God
for the Mussalmans and another for the Hindus, Parsis, and Christians?” He visualised
only one omnipresent God, which he called Truth, for human development.
There is need to remember
Raja Rammohun Roy, whose 250th birth anniversary falls this year. In
1830, he draw up a trust deed of Brahmo Sabha, which explicitly prohibited
religious intolerance and insisted that one of its purposes was to establish
harmony among diverse religious communities. Not surprisingly, Roy has been
hailed as the originator of a renaissance in modern India, who saw religion in
a broader sense of uniting people and society.
Unfortunately, the
present situation is completely different with religion being at the centre
head of politics in the country-- a different form of exploitation of masses.
Faith in India’s diversity rescues us from debilitating pessimism in the face of
ferocious assaults on the expression of rational difference. There is need for propagation
of the ideal of religion of man, being suggested by Ramakrishnaa Mission order
i.e. building a national vision for a humane and united India. And thus, one
shouldn’t follow Golwalkar’s narrow path but focus on idealogy outlined by
Gandhi and Rabindranath Tagore.
Human relationships are
steadily eroding in society, and so also the value system and culture. New theories
are definitely in conflict with our understanding of life, community and
society and with conflicting ideas of India, and growing hatred among
communities there is need to sit up. Majority versus minority, high caste
versus low caste etc must be done away with. More importantly, the government
must stop devising means to divide a fragmented population. Religion must be
seen in broad spectrum, and efforts must be made to bring all sects and classes
together for human development and welfare. Only then will human society be
saved. ---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|