Events & Issues
New Delhi, 30 September 2021
Indianisation
NATIONAL OBJECTIVITY
By Dr. S. Saraswathi
(Former Director,
ICSSR, New Delhi)
Chief Justice of India, NVRamana, who is keen
on judicial reforms by modernising the infrastructure has called for
“Indianisation” of justice delivery system to remove the barriers in the way of
common people in getting justice. This combination of technological
modernisation as the tool and adaptability to local situations in reach has a
common objective of benefiting Indian
people from top to bottom. The need for this is not peculiar to the judicial
system. It is wanted in many spheres.
By Indianisation, the CJI means the need to
adapt to the practical realities of our society and to localise our justice delivery system, which
is based essentially on pre-independence set up. Use of English language and
unfamiliar legal terms some of them drawn even from Roman, Persian, ancient
Hindu and Mohammedan laws, cumbersome procedures, lengthy judgements clothed in
court language understood only by lawyers, and courts at distance are adding to
the woes of poor litigants fighting for justice. They need help even for
handling procedural matters from the stage of filing petition to understanding
the judgement.
The CJI is of the view that the “working and
style of courts do not sit well with the complexities of India”, and clarifies that the system,
practices, rules of courts were colonial in origin and may not be best suited
to the needs of the Indian population.
The main concern in this advice is to bring
the clientele and the judicial system closer by making the “justice delivery
mechanism more people-friendly” so as to ensure that even the most vulnerable
sections can hope to exercise their rights. The lofty ideal of people-centric
system is now popular in public administration, police, judiciary, healthcare
and all such fields directly dealing with people.
The advice is given mainly for justice
delivery and not the contents of law. Justice-seeker must remain the focal
point and the system should be “transparent, accessible, and effective”.
Law-making in democracies is the right and
responsibility of the legislative bodies. Where traditions and customs have to
undergo changes to suit current needs and democratic principles of liberty,
rights, and equality, and contemporary concepts of social justice, human
rights, and inclusiveness, judiciary has
to support innovations provided these do not violate the basic law of the land. Every system and institution has to
and is evolving in free societies to adjust to societal changes.
In the background of CJI’s advice is survival
of several social practices and institutions that lack legal sanction, some of these even
contradicting laws such as the katta panchayats (kangroo courts) and
outdated patriarchal values.
The term “Indianisation” is being used in
different contexts for various purposes. Towards the close of the 19th century,
British colonial bureaucracy in India at the highest level was opened to
Indians by allowing them to take Indian Civil Service Examination (ICS) thus
starting Indianisation of civil services
till then restricted to the Europeans.
Indianisation of law-making during British
rule began in the 1920s when dyarchic system of government was introduced in
the provinces. The Executive consisted of two parts – one called “Reserved” consisting of law and order,
justice, police, land revenue, and irrigation, and the other “transferred”,
which comprised local self-government, education, public health, public works,
agriculture, forests, and fisheries which were transferred to elected Indian
members of the Executive responsible to
the legislature. In this period of Indianisation, the scheme of communal
representation in public services and government control over Hindu religious
institutions were introduced in Madras Presidency, which provided an idea about
future.
The term “Indianisation” is used also to
refer to the spread of cultural practices of the Indian sub-continent
particularly in South-East Asian countries. South Indian languages, arts and
architecture, religions and places of worship such as temples in this region
are evidence of strong influence of Indian link among people of these
countries. Central Asian and East Asian countries also came under the influence
of Indianisation.
The Indian Penal Code, a British gift, came
into force 160 years ago to bring a common criminal code across India. The
legal system and judicial structure established by the British went a long way in furthering the basic intention and
scheme of the colonial rulers “to create a class of persons Indian in blood and
colours, but English in tastes, in morals, in opinion, and in intellect”.
This code has been amended nearly 80 times.
New offences and punishments have been added
following adoption of reformatory laws against dowry, rape, sexual
molestation at workplace, sex determination test, female infanticide, etc. These
are part of the process of Indianisation of law necessitated by Indian social
conditions. Cognisable crimes are broadly classified under two categories –
those falling under IPC and those under Special and Local laws which number over
50.
However, new laws have to conform to the
fundamental principles of criminal law like presumption of innocence until
guilt is proven, equality in application of law, proportionality in treating
offences.
Abolition of the jury system in criminal law
in 1973 may be considered as a major change towards Indianisation of the
criminal procedure brought about after the criminal case involving the naval
commander Nanavati. The then judge in the Allahabad High Court said that there
was not “sufficient number of right class of people to serve as jurors”. M C
Setalvad, the first AttorneyGeneral was of the opinion that Indian people were
“temperamentally ill-suited to act as jurors”. The system, peculiar to common
law and English temperament had“failed to acclimatise and grow in India”. It
was a case of Indianisation of the judicial system.
Law relating to the procedure to be followed
in civil courts is governed by the Civil Procedure Code made in 1859. It
introduced uniform procedure to ensure fair justice and has undergone several
amendments.
Adoption of Hindu Code, which represents
civil law reforms for Hindus in the place of
the body of Hindu personal law is a great step forward in “Indianising”
in the sense of promoting democratic
ideals and uniformity in law. The process can be completed as a national
objective if and when uniform civil code is adopted to benefit people of all
religions.
Indianisation of education is being pursued
vigorously. Indian languages are replacing English as medium of instruction.
Scholars are coming forward to rewrite history from Indian perspective. Civics is being taught with country’s needs
in mind. Value education is being included as part of learning. Vocational
stream is integrated with general education. Classroom teaching is adopting new
methods to suit new generations of learners. Yoga is introduced in several
schools as physical fitness programme. Indigenous and rural sports are
encouraged and forgotten songs, dance forms, and drama are being revived.
Changes are being made in several disciplines
-- Sociology and Social Work which are primarily American in coverage. Social
science research seriously started a scheme of indigenisation (different label for Indianisation) in the
1980s.
In healthcare, revival of indigenous system
of medicine is receiving encouragement along with native dietary and health
practices. Nutritious qualities of old culinary items are remembered. In sum, Indianisation
is a national objective best suited to a plural society.
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|