Events
& Issues
New Delhi, 23
September 2021
Rewriting History
SCHOLARLY NOT
POLITICAL USE
By Dr. S. Saraswathi
(Former Director,
ICSSR, New Delhi)
Vice-President
Venkaiah Naidu referring to the findings in the excavations going on in
Tirunelveli district in Tamil Nadu, which have revealed remnants of over 3,000
years old Tamirabarani Civilization,
has endorsed the views of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin that Indian
history must be rewritten. He said this has to be done “with an Indian
perspective and not through a colonial lens”. Revising history textbooks is
very much on the agenda of the BJP.
The
need for rewriting Indian history and recasting the syllabus and textbooks in
history is being repeatedly urged by some historians, scholars, political and
social leaders in recent years. While pre-independence books were loaded with
colonial bias, post-independence researches with rare exceptions are biased in
their coverage. Contributions of some areas and some people are highlighted and
several others omitted. The result is partial and distorted knowledge of our
own past, even among the highly educated.
Home
Minister Amit Shah, speaking at a seminar in the Banaras Hindu University two
years ago, called for rewriting history -- an idea that always evokes quick
response from both supporters and opponents from academics and others. There
seems to be differences even over historical facts for there is selection and
interpretation in presenting facts including thoughts and events behind a phenomenon. Shah gave a call
to rewrite history from “Indian point of view”, and asked, “Who is stopping us
from amending history?” meaning history books. He put the responsibility on
historians and people to preserve and rewrite the nation’s history.
The
intention of the Government of Tamil Nadu is to start Indian history by tracing
the prosperous trade culture the Tamils had with other countries. Keeladi excavations
have proved the existence of a rich riverside civilization on the banks of the River Vaigai and that Tamils
were literates far back in the 6th century BC.
Rewriting
history has two major dimensions. One is based on new documentary and
archaeological findings supplementing and/ or correcting earlier knowledge. The
other is bringing to light facts missed,
omitted, suppressed or
misinterpreted for various reasons
so as to provide a balanced coverage without bias, which is the biggest
enemy of true history.
On 16
September, Tamil Nadu celebrated centenary for introduction of communal
representation in public service,
which came into force after the dyarchic government in Madras Presidency adopted a
resolution and passed an order
determining the turns of the
recognised communities in a unit
of 12 appointments. This raised the curiosity of the government to go deeper
into history and politics.
Stalin
spoke of collecting pre-independence documents pertaining to Tamil Nadu. In
fact, using these documents, there are many research thesis, published and
unpublished, prepared for research degrees in Madras and other universities in
India and abroad. But, not all of them have found entry into history
books.
Rewriting
history is not changing history. History cannot be changed, but historical
writings can be. Rewriting under discussion in India is to correct errors and
distortions in available texts and add new discoveries. This exercise is long
overdue in our country.
Several
instances of rewriting history guided and directed by politics have taken place
with reference to World Wars mostly to justify a nation’s decisions and
actions. Japanese war crimes, bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Croatian, and
Serbian war crimes, Turkey and the Armenian genocide are some major historical
events that have been rewritten. South Korea,
Japan, China, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan are some of the countries
that have substantially changed contents of history books and have documented historical
events.
Historical
revisionism is a wider exercise which extends to bringing to light new evidence
and new interpretations to help
resurrect memories of important players and significant incidents that form
part of true history. It leads to changes in historical writings, revival of memories,
and more comprehensive understanding of the past, with new facts and
interpretations. This is happening again and again all over the world as part
of history. It is common within the Marxist Movement
Revision
is said to be an essential part of life-giving exercise for history. There cannot
be any ultimate or eternal “truth” about past events and their meaning which
cannot be challenged or changed with fresh revelations. Revisionism is what
makes history lively, and meaningful and trustworthy. People’s problems and
expectations, needs, interests, motivations, and points of view do not remain
constant. Every regime has its own relations with the past and the necessity to
read and grasp the past for evolving, correcting, and framing its perspective.
People have a right to look upon and reinterpret history, an academic task that
can be undertaken only by scholars.
Historical
revisionism is normally done by revisiting the sources of a historical record
of a period with a different perspective or data that could alter how we perceive
it. This way of revisiting history has had both positive and negative aspects.
Today,
our object should be to collect relevant and complete facts to rectify
omissions, imbalance, disproportionate coverage, and to present them without
fear or favour. Indian history that is familiar to us has many gaps and
omissions to be filled. Several areas and peoples are not even mentioned. Knowledge
about social, economic and cultural life when the East India Company was extending
its hold is scanty and scattered. Information on building of cities and ports
or on engineering knowledge and skills, state of science and technology, and
development of arts and architecture will go a long way in building national
unity and integration. History of
freedom movement must be enlarged to cover contributions of various schools of
thought and forgotten personalities, whose sacrifices were immense.
In
2017, a committee of scholars was appointed by the Prime Minister to study
ancient Hindu scripts to establish that these are facts and not myth. An open
enquiry without predetermined conclusions can enlighten our understanding of
the scripts.
A
significant characteristic of historical studies which we cannot afford to
ignore is that past history and present politics are inseparables. This may make
the task of revising historical writings difficult and the ultimate product of
the endeavour controversial. Is it possible to leave the task entirely to
independent scholars working with no political interference? Academic
institutions and scholars are also politicised to such an extent that once the
concept of revision is accepted politically, it is likely to become a routine
affair with every change in government.
We are
already witnessing this in the form of renaming places and programmes,
recasting institutions with notional changes and in its extreme form
overthrowing everything coming from political opponents. Still, we cannot be
pessimistic at the start itself.
History
is “continuous and methodical record” of important or public events connected
with a nation, people, things, etc. Historian, by dictionary definition, is a
writer of history, especially critical analyst as opposed to mere analyst or
compiler. Thus, interpreting data is part of the historian’s work. And so,
whoever sponsors writing or rewriting history should keep away and leave the
work to independent scholars. Otherwise, history will become politics.---INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|