Political
Diary
New Delhi, 26 July
2021
SC Rues Criminals In Politics
JO JEETA WOH SIKANDER!
By
Poonam I Kushish
Q) Teacher: What is
the role of Parliament in our Constitutional democracy?
A) Student: Parliament
plays the vital function of deliberating matters of importance, examining bills
and passing them into laws, overseeing the work of the Executive and State
institutions and ensuring accountability of Government to this temple of
democracy.
Teacher:
Partly correct. Today it stands for hulla-gulla,
pandemonium, walk-outs, coming to blows, breaking mikes, chairs and tables.
Succinctly creating a tamasha.
Big deal! And why
quibble about Parliament’s first week being a washout or the ugly spectacle of
a TMC Rajya Sabha MP snatching IT Minister Vaishnav’s papers while speaking on
the Pegasus spyware controversy followed by a heated exchange between him and
Housing Minister Puri resulting in Marshals taking the MP out of the House.
Raising a moot point:
If our Right Honourbles can behave like this and get away with just suspension
from the session, why blame the aam aadmi
for bedlam, being a public nuisance or road rage? After all, aren’t our Right
Honourables supposed to lead by example and hold a beacon for others to follow?
But the story doesn’t
end there. Last Tuesday a rueful Supreme Court underscored that taint continues
to be the flavor of the season despite it ordering Parties to not field
candidates with criminal antecedents in the Bihar Assembly polls last year. And
explain through
published material how “qualifications or achievements or merit” of a
candidate, charged with a crime, impressed it enough to cast aside the smear of
his criminal background instead of a decent citizen.
Hearing
a contempt petition against Parties for failing to declare criminal antecedents
of candidates during Bihar elections, the Court said: “There is unity in
diversity. We have been telling the legislature to take action against the
candidates against whom charges have been framed but nothing has been done.
Nothing is done and nothing will ever be done by any Party to prevent criminals
from entering politics and standing for elections. Unfortunately, we can’t
legislate.”
What
is it about taint and cleaning rajniti that
has our netas scurrying for cover?
Especially when they go blue in the face about ushering in safedi ki chamkaan wali politics. Go to any extent to prove (sic)
their sincere endeavours? Yet when it comes to acting on their words, they
feign ignorance and play dumb, blind and deaf.
Shockingly,
a whopping
2,556 MPs and MLAs from 22 States are accused in criminal cases as of September last. If former legislators are also included the number rises
to 4,442. Presently, 233 of 539 or 43% of our Right Honourables have criminal
cases pending against them of which 29% are serious: 10 MPs have convicted
cases, 11 cases related to murder, 30 attempt to murder and 19 crimes against
women.
Of these the BJP has 116 of 301 MPs (39%),
Congress 29 of 51 (57%), DMK 10 of 23 (43%), Trinamool 9 of 22 (41%) and JD(U)
13 of 16 (81%). One
Congress MP has declared 204 cases including committing culpable homicide,
house trespass, robbery and criminal intimidation. A 100% increase from 24% in 2004, 30% in 2009
and 34% in 2014.
Less said the better of States. In UP 143 (36%) of 403-MLAs,
Bihar 142 (58%) of 243 MLAs face criminal charges of whom 70 (49%) have been
charge-sheeted. In fact, UP has the highest number of MLAs facing criminal
cases wherein of 1,217 pending cases, 446 are those of sitting legislators, 37%
from BJP. Further, 35 sitting and 81 ex-MLAs stand accused of heinous crimes
punishable with life term.
In Bihar
531 sitting and ex-MLAs are charge-sheeted of which 73 are punishable with life
imprisonment. Followed by Kerala 333 cases, Odisha 331, Maharashtra 330 and
Tamil Nadu 324. Arguably, with such
legislators, how can we expect to remove crime from the country?
Alas, in a milieu
where power translates into a numbers game Parties brazenly nominate mafia dons
and criminals as candidates as they convert muscle power into votes at gun
point with illicit funds emerging victorious over those with clean records.
Consequently, racketeers and murderers fill the rogues' gallery of power and
fame. The arrangement works on quid-pro-quo.
Parties get unlimited funds to fight elections and criminals protection from law.
Why do mafia dons
invest large sums in getting a neta’s
tag? It’s a ticket to continue extortions using political power, gain influence
and ensure cases against them are dropped. Besides, the returns on political
investments are so high and profitable that criminals are disinclined to invest
in anything else.
From criminalisation
of politics to politicisation of crime, India has come full circle. Sadly, the
number of mafiaso-politicos are rapidly multiplying in legislatures ushering in
a new ‘don’ (dawn) wherein yesterday’s mafia dons are today Right Honourables:
a law unto themselves and all-powerful. With an MP-MLA tag, acting like a magic
shield from police, encounters and rivals.
Bringing things to
such a pass that our jan sevaks dance
to the tune of their underworld benefactors at the cost of the people. Consequently,
with apradhi-banne-netas democracy is
being boxed in three stages --- mafia box, cartridge box and ballot box!
Scandalously,
criminal are crowding out honest candidates at national and State level.
According to a recent report 45.5% ‘criminal’ candidates win against 24.7% with
clean backgrounds. Thus, in this self perpetuating system the growing Indian
middle class is not averse to electing criminals if they can become their
patrons and deliver goods.
Questionably, does
the electorate really want an honest politician? Doesn’t seem so. Many good
candidates are known to lose their deposits. Besides, an honest person can
promise to fight the system and reform it, but voters prefer venal fixers who
flex muscle, terrorise constituents to keep them in check or provide
protection, ration and Government jobs. For this, he gets votes.
Not a few chikna ghara leaders argue that just
because a candidate has criminal antecedents doesn't mean he is not doing
social work. As a Chief Minister argued about having 22 Ministers in his
Cabinet with criminal antecedents, "I don't bother about the Ministers'
past. After joining the Government, they are not indulging in crimes and are
ready to help suppress criminal activities. Ask the people why they have
elected them.” How does one rebut this logic?
One
could have dismissed politico-criminalisation as a passing phase but the
tragedy is that our democratic system has been usurped by criminals. Whereby
the country is suffering from want of a “few good men” as some rulers act for personal
political gains wasting taxpayers’ money by announcing outlandish schemes and
subsidies and the country can go to hell.
Clearly, criminalisation
of politics must be eschewed. The time has come for Parliament to consider an
amendment to the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and frame a law which disallows
candidates against whom charges have been framed in court for serious offences.
Alongside we need to educate voters and create enhanced awareness, increase
democratic participation by creating the right conditions for de-criminalisation
of politics.
We need to answer three
questions. How many murder charges are required before one is considered unfit
to represent the people of India? How long will our criminal-politicos slug it
out for “bullet-proof jackets” --- MP-MLA’s tag? Are there no honest and
capable netas? Else be prepared today’s
criminal king-makers may be tomorrow’s kings! ---- INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|