Events
& Issues
New Delhi, 1 July 2021
Judiciary’s Modernisation
AMBITIOUS PLAN FOR
NJIC
By DrS.Saraswathi
(Former Director,
ICSSR, New Delhi)
“I am of the firm belief that unless
infrastructure is strengthened, it is unfair to expect courts, particularly
lower courts, to do miracles and
increase the pace of justice delivery. Both quality and quantity of justice delivery can be improved only when support systems are
showing enough to meet the challenges”,
said the Chief Justice of Indiaspeaking on his plan of constituting a National Judicial
Infrastructure Corporation (NJIC). Justice NVRamana assumed the office of the CJI
with the plan of modernising the judicial infrastructure at all levels andcreated the NJICfor the purpose. He has raised
the expectations of all for an end to at least some major ills like long delay from
which the judicial systemfrom top to bottom is suffering.
The NJICis conceived “to build a
comprehensive, self-contained, all-inclusive, and modern court complexes across
the country to augment judicial infrastructure”. The Corporation envisaged by
the CJI to “help bringuniformityand standardisation in judicial
infrastructure”, will be managed by a
committee comprising judges of the Supreme Court who have chances of becoming CJI in future, CJs of High Courts
having long tenures, and Finance Secretaries to Union and State Governments, and will be headed by the CJI.
In the context of the
judiciary,infrastructure does not refer only to spacious building complexes
withmodern furniture and amenities andfilling up vacancies. CJI explains that modernisation
of judicial infrastructure is for “providing equal and free access to justice”
which would be possible through a
“barrier-free and citizen-friendly environment”.
It will coverthe entire processes,
tools,information system including storing of
documents and their retrieval, and telecommunication networks, internet,
etc. Day-to-day functioning of the legal system depends on these tools, and its efficiency depends much on the ready
availability of modern gadgets and their
upgradation fromtime to time. Management of casedocuments, records fromother relevant
cases, precedents and previous arguments and verdicts are the indispensable tools
in judicial decision-making.
Infrastructure for any
institution expands with advancement oftechnology. Many non-legal,
non-judicial expertisewill berequiredto handle work at every stageof
justicedelivery mechanism.
Presently, the image of the courts
particularly subordinate courts isone of oldbuildings crowded with men and material – litigants and
advocates loudly discussing cases and huge piles of vertically folded paper records
of several years. The image has to change and with it also several legal
practices like adjournment, which contributeto delay in justice.
Pendency in subordinate courts are much more
than inhigh courts.In April 2021, cases
pending in various courts were over 67,000 in the SC,57.53 lakh in high
courts, and 3.81 crore in district and subordinate courts which was 19%
increase since March 2020. The number is expected to grow further – a
situation to which poor infrastructure
is a major contributing factor.Judicial system atthe three levels has taken a long
time to adopt computerisation. E-project for
e-payment,e-summons,e-hearings,ande-judgement,which has been taken up by the SC,
must be extended to all high courts
andsubordinatecourts.
NitiAayog, in a Strategy Paper prepared in 2018, has noted
that it will take more than 324 years to clear backlog in courts, which was 2.9
crore at that time. The situation is more grim today.
Another problem is vacancies in the post of
judges to the tune of over 5,000 in subordinate courts, and about 400 in high
courts. To keep posts vacant when cases
are pending and piling up enormously,isbound to be discredited asa sign
of negligence and indifference.Law making and execution will not serve the
purpose unless the machinery that can establish the constitutionality of
legislations, and prevent violations of the rule of law is well-oiled to run
fast. Courts need not intrude into the sphere of the legislature or executive,
but has to adhere to the principle of separation of powers.
Added to the normal problems bothering the
judiciary, the impact of Covid-19 and restrictions under lockdown have almost paralysedthefunctioning
of the judiciary to bring the whole system to a standstill. Ithas provoked
courts to seek ways of circumventing pandemic restrictions on face-to-face contacts which effectively block
court procedures. A remedy is sought in modernisation of court procedures by
adoption of digital technology. As India
is not generally averse to the idea of technologicalinnovationsper se, but only bothered aboutpractical
difficulties in the way, there is hope that the Indian legal machinery can get
ready to adopt modernisation with
ease which will facilitate strengthening the judicial infrastructure.
Legal system has already entered into the
digital era in India. It may be recalledthat in 2003, while hearing acase
of State of Maharashtra, the SC held that recording of
evidence by a court through video-conferencing shall be considered to be “as
per the procedure established by law”.
It marked the beginning of the use of the system of video-conferencing in court
procedure. Online procedure is an
accepted form of disputeresolution.
India is not alone in facing pandemic caused
judicial paralysis. It is felt all over the world compelling many countries to
discover ways of conducting judicial work without physical presence of men and
women in courts.
Jury trial had to be suspended in many
countries where it was in vogue in the wake of the spread of the pandemic. Only essentiallitigations
were taken up in many European countries. Indiatoo had to restrict judicial operations to urgent
matters and reduced number of judges on duty.
In the US, legal apprenticeship conducted
with the use of remote technology led to a rapid change in conducting litigations by using
the same technology. Technology enabled proceedings conducted by persons stationed at different
places replaced personal attendance in courts and court rooms.Canadian Federal Courtstarted
remote trial by video-conferencing in 2020 after a
trial management conference. A write-up on this expresses a hope that
Canada will continue it after the pandemic also, which seems to convey that
hesitancy over trial without physical presence of witnesses is common.Singapore,
which was using videolinks even before the pandemic, extendeditsusagetofacilitate
continuance of Covid-appropriatebehaviour.China started with a positiveattitude to remote hearings in
courts.
To help accelerate global transformation in
judicial service, an international association of judges, lawyers, court officials, litigants,
and court technologists has come up to share their experiences in application
of technology to develop “remote alternatives”
to traditional forms of court hearings.
Pandemic continuing for a long time in many
waves , the practice of remote hearings and remote delivery of judgements are
likely to settle as permanent features of the judicial system in many countries that are able to teach and train
concerned people in the use of remote technology. India has to go along with
them andcreate necessaryinfrastructure.In
doingthis, the danger of digital
divide making justice a “remote” possibility to the digitally deprived
population has to be avoided. ---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|