Political
Diary
New Delhi, 1 December 2020
Modi’s New Poser
HALT INDIA’S POLL
MERRY-GO-ROUND
By Poonam I Kaushish
Bribery in public services continues to plague
India with corruption watchdog Transparency International underscoring India has
the highest bribery rate in Asia, 46% paid bribes as it was demanded, 32% used
personal connections else they would not receive service and 63% said if they reported sleaze, they would
suffer retaliation. Leaving the public angry and frustrated. Sic.
Lost in this din was Prime Minister Modi pitching
once again for ‘One Nation One Poll’ nee simultaneous elections to elected
bodies at various levels at the 80th All India Presiding Officers Conference last
week. It would not only save the Exchequer and Parties money but enable
Governments both Centre and States to concentrate on delivering good governance,
he added. Besides, giving ample time to netas
to take people-oriented schemes to the aam
aadmi.
Specially against the backdrop that money
makes the clogged and corrupt electoral mare go around in the Great Indian
Political Circus and how! Wherein netas use
polls to amass money, political energy is diverted in injecting a heavy dose of
vote-bank politics with politicians progressively allowing this malady to
become chronic thereby gravely undermining governance. Power, more power and
absolute power is replete with I-me myself syndrome. Worse, even the semblance
of administration is dispensed with. All in the vicious grip of Perpetual Election
Syndrome with the devil taking the hindmost!
Questionably, is it an idea whose time has finally
come? Can one hold simultaneous polls for Parliament, State Legislatures right
down to Panchayats? Is it in national interest? Given that over the last few
decades the country has been afflicted by PES week after week, month after
month. Wasteful expenditure, noisy campaigns, rallies, blocked roads disrupting
our lives. A year-long merry-go-round, wreaking havoc on our body politic ---
right, left and centre.
Let’s face it. With State after State going
for elections every year, running the Central Government has become a challenge
when the country is in PES. In 2011, 5 States Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Assam,
Puducherry and Bengal, 2012 UP, Goa, Punjab, Manipur and Uttarakhand, 2013
Delhi, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan
and Mizoram.
In 2014 Lok Sabha and four States
Maharashtra, Haryana, Telengana and Andhra, 2015 Delhi, Bihar, Jharkhand and J&K,
2016 Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Bengal and Assam, 2018 Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan,
Telangana and Mizoram, 2019 Lok Sabha, Maharashtra, Haryana, Karnataka and Goa
and Bihar recently.
Think. One mega election every five years with
a common voter list would not only save time and money spent in electioneering
but it is one way to get rid of incompetence, malfeasance and casual governance,
enabling Central and State Governments to work, take hard decisions in public
interest and deliver good governance without worrying about the impact on its vote
banks. As many good initiatives are dumped due to poll considerations lest it
upset a caste, community, religion or region. All, becoming victims of policy
paralysis, mismanagement and poor implementation.
Another
benefit of concurrent polls is it would result in huge financial saving as over
the years election costs have sky rocketed. Statistics say it all: In 1952, the
first national election for Lok Sabha and Assemblies the cost was just over Rs
10 crores. In the subsequent two elections 1957 and 1962 expenditure came down
to almost Rs 6 and Rs 7.5 crores respectively.
Recall,
till 1971 simultaneous elections were held for the Centre and State
legislatures. It was only when Indira Gandhi dissolved Lok Sabha and advanced
polls by a year that this synchronization fell apart. This resulted in many
unstable Governments at the Centre and States leading to early dissolution of
the Lok Sabha or Assemblies.
Moreover,
expenditure saw an upward spiral. It doubled to over Rs 23 crores in 1980,
further doubled to Rs 54 crores in 1984 and Rs 154 crores in 1989. In 1991expenses
shot up to Rs 359 crores, 1999 it was Rs 880 crores, 2004 Rs 1300 crores and
2014 Lok Sabha elections entailed Rs 4500 crores expenditure, though the Centre
for Media Studies said it was over Rs 30,000 crores and a staggering Rs 60,000
crores in 2019.
The
Bihar Government spent over Rs 725 crores for last
month’s Assembly polls, the less said the better about expenses incurred by candidates,
Parties and Election Commission. A complete waste of the taxpayer’s hard money
being spent over and over again mindlessly.
Obversely, many believe it is not advisable
to have simultaneous poll. The proposal could be motivated by political
considerations, as when concurrent elections are held voters tend to vote for
the same Party. Also, poll issues at the Centre and States are quite different
and it would create confusion. A Party could be deserving of support at the
Centre for its policies and performance at the national level. Yet, the same
Party could be deserving of popular punishment and defeat for its policies and
performance at the State level.
Further, a fixed term for the Lok Sabha and State
Legislatures goes against the basic tenets of Parliamentary democracy.
Hypothetically, if a Government enjoying the people’s mandate is voted out, it would
continue to hold office or be replaced by another Government, which might not
necessarily enjoy the popular mandate.
Plainly, a Government which lacks the
confidence of the House would be foisted on the people, with no say in the
matter. Smacking of de facto
dictatorship or monarchical anarchy, an idea which translates in to unrepresentative
governance.
However, some feel simultaneous elections
could be held for State Assemblies and they be given a fixed term. If an
elected State Government was to fall, the Centre could impose President’s rule
till the time for a fresh poll. But the Lok Sabha cannot have a fixed term as
there is no provision for President’s rule at the Centre. This could create
more problems than solving them.
Either way, the idea needs to be debated
extensively. Its pros and cons weighed before arriving at a final solution as
the alteration would entail changing the Constitution’s basic structure.
Further, though the BJP backs simultaneous polls, Congress, Left and Trinamool
think it’s impractical, unworkable, not feasible and anti-democratic.
Where do we go from here? Pertinently, in 2015
the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law recommended “a practicable method
of holding simultaneous elections. In 2018,
the Law Commission tabled a set of recommendations proposing for a system of
elections modelled on Sweden, South Africa and Belgium. In Sweden, elections to
county and municipal councils take place in tandem with the country's general
elections every four years. Ditto in South Africa where concurrent polls are
held every five years.
Belgium's Federal Parliament elections are
also held every five years, coinciding with the European Parliament elections.
A similar system is prevalent in Spain, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia, Albania,
Israel, Lesotho Philippines, Costa Rica, Bolivia, Guatemala and was introduced
in Indonesia last year.
The US model could be considered. The
President and State Governors are elected directly for a fixed four-year term
and choose their own teams. The President is answerable to the House of
Representatives and Senate but is not required to seek their confidence vote.
This ensures good governance, stability and continuity enabling him to take
hard decisions without fear of losing power.
In sum elections are the bedrock of our
democracy but we should avoid duplication of polls. With States in election
mode every year, running the Government is akin to running with the hare and
hunting with the hound. India’s democracy should not be reduced to a tu-tu mein-mein between Parties all the
time. Modi could well position One Poll as the next big reform to ‘clean’
India, take the Opposition by surprise
and market it as enough of destructive PES! ---- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|