Political
Diary
New Delhi, 24 November 2020
Love Jihad
HOLIER THAN THOU
CONVERSIONS!
By Poonam I Kaushish
India
is once again caught up in a battle royale between the Gods, in a new age
avatar: Love Jihad (LJ), a convenient
political tool and de rigueur fallaciously
wrapped in development that helped bring the BJP to power at the Centre and
several States and get it Hindu votes. Whereby, ishq-mohabat-shaadi cutting across caste and religious boundaries
inter-meshed with forced conversions churned the political cauldron resulting
in an unholy clash between the ‘holier than thou’!
The latest Love Jihad outcry
has its genesis in a 21-year-old
girl being shot dead outside her college in Haryana’s Faridabad with the
girl’s family alleging the
accused had been pressuring her to religiously convert and marry him. Thereby,
reopening the can of worms of the old familiar enemy, country wide.
The modus operandi is simple. Young Muslim men call
themselves Sonu Bhai, Pappu bhai wear
red hand bands to appear Hindus, feign love to non-Muslim women and then trap girls to elope and marry
them for the “sole purpose” of converting them to Islam either forcibly or fraudulently.
Resulting in the Hindutva brigade bandying Bahu-Beti Bachao Sangharsh Samitis and
unleashing an aggressive, systematic campaign to create “awareness” and combat LJ
with the BJP being the driving force behind anti love-jihadists legislations
across States ruled by it. Wherein, any action taken against them is justified,
even if it means taking law into their hands. Said UP Chief Minister Yogi
Adityanath, “those who conceal their identity and play with the honour of our
sisters and daughters, if you don’t mend your ways, your ‘Ram naam satya’ journey (final trip) will begin.”
To stem this, five Saffron States: UP, MP, Haryana, Karnataka
and Assam are readying a strict law against ‘Love
Jihad’, after the Allahabad High Court recently observed that religious
conversion only for the purpose of marriage was unacceptable. This comes on the
heels of BJP-ruled Himachal having passed an anti-LJ Bill last year.
In
fact, Madhya Pradesh’s proposed Freedom of Religion Bill, 2020 describes LJ as
a cognizable and non-bailable offence and provides for five years rigorous
imprisonment. Assam has warned it will ensure jail term for anyone who harasses
an Assamese girl or makes her a victim of love jihad by hiding their identity if
the BJP comes back to power in 2021. Despite, the Union Home Ministry clarifying
Love Jihad is not defined under
existing laws and no such case has been reported so far.
Not many are aware the
LJ programme started in 1996 with blessings of some Muslim organizations in
Kerala, though the term was first heard in the State’s Pathanamthitta district
in September 2009 and used in a Kerala High Court judgment three months later.
Dubbing it ‘an alleged Muslim plot to forcefully convert young brilliant Hindu
girls to Islam by having Muslim boys entrap them in love affairs’, it asked the
State Government to consider enacting a law to prohibit such “deceptive acts of
LoveJihad”.
Notwithstanding
denials by Islamic fundamentalist outfits like National Democratic Front (NDF)
and ‘Campus Front’ of Popular Front of India (PFI), the Kerala Government said that
2,667 women had converted to Islam in the State since 2006. Police figures on
the other hand total over 8000 conversions in the last four years alone. Add to
this another 60,000 girls have been converted in Karnataka alone according to
the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti. In the
last two months UP registered over 20 LJ
cases.
Importantly, religious
conversion has become the most exploited and explosive social and political
issue in India. Reminiscent of the flurry of orchestrated propaganda campaign
and popular inflammatory and demagogic appeals launched by the Arya Samaj and
other Hindu revivalist bodies in the 1920s in UP, against the “abduction” and
conversions of Hindu women by Muslim goondas,
ranging from allegations of rape, elopement to luring, conversion, love and
forced marriages to draw sharper lines between Hindus and Muslims. Although the
term “love jihad” was not used at the time.
Turn North, South,
East or West, the story is the same. Religion is turning out to be a question
of money, big money. Recall, flush with funds from their headquarters in the
US, a number of church groups allegedly converted hundreds of Hindus to
Christianity in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Kashmir and Karnataka by
giving them money and jobs in the decades post Independence.
On the flip side, the
VHP and the Bajrang Dal too established groups of armed youth, called Raksha Sena, in every village of
Chhattisgarh, in order to stop conversions to Christianity. And where conversions had taken place another
movement called the Ghar Wapsi
(“Return Home”) was launched in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh,
Jharkhand, Gujarat and Orissa for reconverting the tribal Christian back to
Hinduism.
To put an end to this five
States: Rajasthan, Orissa, Arunachal Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Gujarat have
enacted anti-conversion laws that bar conversions but allow re-conversions to
Hinduism. Jharkhand has declared its intention to enact a similar law.
In
fact, Article 25 of our Constitution which lays down the tenets of freedom of
religion has an important rider. It
specifies the limits within which religious freedom can be exercised. All
persons, it states are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and the right
to freely profess, practice and propagate religion, subject to public order,
morality and health.
Dispute,
if any, can only be on the interpretation of the expression “propagate any
religion”. Suffices to say that the
State will not allow its citizens to do whatever they please in the name and
under the guise of religion. Clearly,
our political Parties debunk Article 25 in quest of minority votes.
Fortunately,
the Supreme Court settled this matter in 1973 wherein it distinguished between
the right to proselytize and the right to convert. Upholding the Constitutional
validity on anti-conversion laws enacted by Orissa and Madhya Pradesh in
1967-68, it ruled: “What the Constitution grants is not the right to convert
another person to one’s own religion, but to transmit or spread one’s religion
by an exposition of its tenders.” The Court also observed that organized
conversion was anti-secular and that respect for all religions was the essence
of India’s secularism.
Undeniably,
the tales of the 1920s and of 2020 have certain common strains. Both campaigns
are critically tied to a number-crunching politics and claims of Hindu
homogeneity. Also LJ is today’s favourite
political whipping boy. Accused Rajasthan’s Chief Minister Gehlot, “The
BJP is manufacturing Love Jihad to divide the nation and disturb communal
harmony.”
Undeniably,
religious conversions have nothing to do with protecting the sanctity of a
religion. Nor does religious freedom justify extension to a planned programme
of conversions. Such exercises are an aggression against the religious freedom
of others. Hence, no quarter should be given to Muslim or Hindu
communalism.
It
is time now for our leaders to spare a thought for all those who have lost
their lives in the meaningless Love Jihad
over the years and delink religion from politics. Importantly, they need to
understand that by playing Hindus and Muslims against each other they are only
serving their vested interests. Neither Lord Ram nor will Allah forgive the
polity for playing havoc in its name.
Let
us not reduce LJ to a political gimmick.
We need to consider a ban on divisive politics. High time we did a cost-benefit analysis and put a stop to converting religious gush
into political slush. True Love Jihad,
anyone? ----- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|