EVENTS & ISSUES
New
Delhi, 15 October 2007
Fight Against Terror
NEEDED: FEDERAL POLICE FORCE
By TD Jagadesan
India has stood witness to two dastardly
terror attacks in the last ten days alone. The first at the dargah of the Sufi saint, Khwaja
Moinuddin Chisti in Ajmer,
Rajasthan, a shrine in revered alike by Muslims, Hindus and Christians, which
killed 2 and left 17 injured. The second at a cinema hall in Ludhiana,
Punjab which killed 7 and maimed over 40
people.
Coming on the heels of the twin
blasts at Hyderabad
last month the incidents have once again pushed the Centre and the State
Governments into the dock. More so, as the Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil
had issued a stern warning against terror attacks to the States at the conference
of Director Generals and IGs of Police New Delhi last fortnight.
Raising a million dollar question:
How does one fight terrorism and stem the tide with a firm hand? The answer is
to create a Federal Police Force to tackle this two-headed monster, always
hungry and always on the move.
Sadly, till now India’s
counter-terror strategy usually follows a predictable pattern after ever act of
terror. Grandiose statements are made by our polity that we will not “tolerate”
terrorism and the nation will not be cowed down by such acts of “cowardice.” An
avalanche of VIP visits follow, disturbing the law and order machinery.
After this a competition starts
within the media with different news agencies airing divergent theories about
the perpetrators. Subsequently leaks appear that the Central agencies had
already alerted the State concerned. But the latter had failed to act upon the prior
“intelligence.”
The State Chief Minister hurriedly
announces that a “new” agency would be created to tackle terrorism. In the end,
everything dies down. Until another terror attack takes place and the charade
starts all over again.
The Hyderabad attacks are a case in point.
Immediately after the two incidents at Lumbini
Park and the Old City,
media speculation about the perpetrators ranged from the Naxalites, HUJI, LeT,
Dawood and the JeM. Initially, the Andhra Chief Minister Rajasekhar Reddy
pleaded helplessness asserting that the conspiracy had been hatched abroad. His
statement regarding the complicity of Pakistan
evoked a sharp riposte from Islamabad.
Then the Government changed it
tactic and stated that an allied force like the “Greyhounds” would be created.
It was also announced that the State would recruit 100 linguists (knowing
Arabic, Turkish, Persian, Pushtu, Bangla, Uzbek, Baluchi, Kurdish, Hebrew,
Spanish and Chechen) to “fight terror”. One only hopes that this will not give
rise to another diplomatic furore, since the countries which use these
languages can legitimately protest that they are not the places of origins of
such terror.
After which another information got
leaked that the State had failed to act upon the Intelligence Bureau’s (IB)
warning. The contents of the warning were never spelt out. Only one newspaper
published that the warning “was too vague.”
It also said that the modules could
take up “some sensational terrorist attacks in Mumbai, Bangalore
or Hyderabad.”
Does this amount actionable intelligence? A retired IB Director defended such
alerts by stating that it was left to the State police to infiltrate such modules
and extract actionable intelligence.
However, recall that after the
railway attacks of 7/11 in Mumbai last year, the then Mumbai Police
Commissioner had asserted that he had never been given any indication that the
Mumbai suburban railway system would be attacked in his several meetings with
the IB at the highest level before the incident. In fact, it seems that the
Central intelligence agencies had only indicated that the religious places would
be targeted.
Yet, the Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh gently chided the Mumbai police in one of his speeches. Clearly, this
shadow boxing has to stop. The public is tired of these ping-pong battles
between the States and the Central agencies. The State satraps have to realize that they cannot replicate national intelligence
agencies at the State level. Immediately after 7/11 it was announced that Maharashtra would “revamp” its intelligence machinery and
recruit “non-police officials” similar to the Old Bombay Special Branch.
One does not know what happened to
that. Even if such “revamping” is done, its results will be experienced after
decades. The Old Bombay Special Branch had a hard core of non-transferable
non-police officials who met the then challenges admirably. Unfortunately, that
system was allowed to wind up and the non-police officers gravitated to
“profitable” police influence. Where is the guarantee then that something
similar will not happen again?
Acting upon the Maharashtra
and Andhra decisions, other States might also announce the creation of such
“elite” forces. But recruiting 100 linguists for a State force for
communicating intelligence can at best be a pipe-dream.
Especially against the backdrop,
that even our Central agencies are perennially short of linguists proficient in
foreign languages. Shockingly, most of these posts are lying vacant. Even if
one is able to recruit linguists has anyone considered the sheer volume of data
that has to be transcribed and converted into actionable intelligence?
Our State leaders must realize the
inherent handicap the forces face in penetrating terrorist modules. Terrorism
is transnational, professional and secretive in nature, conducted by highly
motivated cadres. On the other hand, the State police units are fragmented,
largely inefficient, slow in reaction, badly trained and highly politicized.
Not only that. The operational
efficiency of the police units differs vastly from State to State. Coordination
between the police units is hardly satisfactory. Worse, the interrogation
reports are not shared promptly. Needless to say, a Centralized operation
against terrorism has always produced better results, although there is no
guarantee that it would eliminate terrorism. However, at least there would be
greater accountability as none would be able to pass the buck.
Recall, a Group of Ministers (GoM)
set-up by the previous NDA Government had recommended the setting up of a Federal
Police Force to tackle a federal crime like terrorism and to curb the Naxalite
menace. However, the meeting of Chief Ministers called by Manmohan Singh in
September 2006 to take up the NDA proposal brushed aside the recommendation. In
fact, even Chief Ministers belonging to the BJP opposed the move, fearing the
erosion of their power.
Since then, several eminent jurists
have supported the idea of having a federal anti-terrorist force to tackle this
nation-wide scourge. But it is the State Chief ministers who are resisting the
idea.
How many more 7/11s, Mecca Masjid,
Hyderabad, Ajmer and Ludhiana incidents need to take place before these power
hungry politicians are made to agree to this excellent suggestion of a federal
police force! ---- INFA
(Copyright India News & Feature Alliance)
|