Open Forum
New Delhi, 29 January 2020
Widening Inequality
HAS GOVT WILL TO REMOVE POVERTY?
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
It is a widely known
fact that inequality has been widening in most Third World countries, including
India. This runs contrary to the effect of various developmental programmes
being carried out by national governments and international agencies
enumerating such activities with targets and resultant benefits. Added to this,
politicians are boosting about such plans and the likely benefits to accrue to
the poorer sections of society. But reports reveal that not much of welfare has
been reaching the poor and the marginalised sections.
Not that the scenario
is likely to change. Given the fact that in most democracies like India, the
politician-business nexus is quite strong, it is but natural that in the coming
years, the benefits of development will be captured by the rich, leaving
something for the upper middle class. Moreover, with the cry for privatisation
becoming more pronounced in India and elsewhere, the poor are likely to suffer
more due to the strong profit motive of the private sector in areas such as
health, education etc. In fact, this phenomenon is already evident in our
country.
The recent Oxfam
report titled ‘Time to Care’ revealed that just one per cent hold more than
four times the wealth held by 953 million people who make up for the bottom 70
per cent of the country’s population. The total wealth of all the 106 Indian
billionaires (Rs 28.9 lakh crore) is more than the full year budget of 2018-19
(Rs 24.4 lakh crore). Moreover, the startling finding has been that there has
been a 46 per cent increase in wealth of the top one per cent but just 3 per
cent of the bottom 50 per cent. Though not mentioned in the study, it is
generally believed that there may have been an increase of just one per cent of
the bottom 25 per cent of the country’s population.
Social and economic
unrest is a common phenomenon in almost every country as also in India sparked
by different tipping points like corruption, constitutional breaches, inflation
of basic goods and services etc., aptly pointed out by the World Economic Forum
report. It is thus clearly discernible that that the broken economies are
lining the pockets of billionaires and big business houses at the expense of
ordinary men and women who struggle for a dignified existence.
It may be significant
here to mention the Global Wealth Report 2018 which found that since the start
of the millennium wealth in the country grew at 9.2 per cent of year, faster
than the global average of 6 per cent even after taking into account population
growth of 2.2 per cent annually. Analysing this with the findings of the Oxfam
report clearly reflects that the wealth has been cornered by the rich and upper
middle income sections.
A significant point
made in the Oxfam report is that governments are massively under taxing the
wealthiest individuals and corporations and failing to collect revenues that
could help lift the impoverished sections by providing them basic facilities as
also adequate health care and education. But unmindful of the huge population
living under or near poverty like conditions, there is pressure from various
lobbies, including journalists who pose to be economists, to cut welfare
expenses and privatise systems though knowing fully-well that the private
sector in our country is utterly dishonest and only bent on making money
through unscrupulous means.
The disturbing
element is that only 5.87 crore income tax returns were filed up to August 15,
2019 which is hardly impressive considering the country’s wealth generation
trends. As per tax returns released by the revenue department, the number of
crorepati taxpayers was only 97,689 during the assessment year 2018-19, which
may presently be around one crore. India boasts to be the world’s fifth largest
economy in US dollar terms after the US, China, Japan and Germany but the
revenue collection is poor to service such a large economy with a high
population density.
The question arises
whether tax collection is being done judiciously or whether just those salaried
persons are targeted. It may be mentioned here that professionals like doctors
and engineers earn lakhs of rupees income per month but are hardly taxed.
Moreover, there are big players in the capital market who earn handsomely but
use unfair means to hide the eyes of the income tax department.
Obviously, the rise
in crorepatis affects the poverty syndrome. As most of their wealth gains come
from property and stock market booms, they do not translate into employment
opportunities or help into funding developmental programmes. National
governments in India and elsewhere are very much concerned with the wealthy,
who fund political parties and election campaigns, and their interests are
given priority over those of the poor and economically weaker sections.
The declining
consumption expenditure, apart from increasing unemployment and underemployment
points to the fact that though the percentage of population below the poverty
line may have decreased a little, taking the economically weaker sections into
cognizance, it would clearly reveal that their livelihood patterns are becoming
poorer. It is a well-known fact that the higher the average per capita
consumption, the lower the head count ratio or poverty.
Things are generally
judged from better-off rural areas but the conditions prevailing in the
backward areas and districts of the country is indeed quite distressing. The
government is oblivious to these conditions, specially of the scheduled tribes
and dalits and how they earn their livelihood. In the present state of things,
there is no likelihood whatsoever of the disparity between the rich and the
poor, the urban and the rural class, the industrial worker and the farmer
narrowing or even remaining static.
The obvious reason is
because the capitalist government is not really interested to transform the
rural sector and the livelihoods of the marginalised sections. The politicians
aided by the bureaucrats do not have a decentralised, grass-root approach and
prefer to dictate from the top. Thus, the real problems of the masses are not
heard and remain neglected.
On the other hand,
the resource constraints of the government are a major hindrance to removing poverty.
There are several meetings before the Budget with industrialists, chambers of
commerce but very few with farmers’ organisations or with panchayats
representatives to know what are their real problems and which schemes should
be taken up in the current year. Obviously, the demands and concessions of the
business class get priority as also expenses related to defence – where the
party in power is assured of a sizeable cut-off – while those of the farming
community is ignored.
Unless the planning
strategy is changed and the skewed development strategy is geared towards the
rural sector with agriculture and agro industries getting a thrust, inequality
in incomes and lifestyles would remain. One cannot and should keep hopes on the
current genre of politicians, at least in India and such other countries where
true democracy does not exist.----INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|