Events
& Issues
New Delhi, 18 December 2019
New Citizenship Law
WHAT PURPOSE WILL IT FULFIL?
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
Aggressiveness and
arrogance in decision-making whether in the political, economic or social
spheres may backfire if the confidence of other political parties is not taken
into confidence. In a democratic set-up like India, consensus has to be the key
in any major policy formulation. But the ruling party has stirred a hornet’s
nest in aggressively promoting the need to have a National Register of Citizens
(NRC) all over the country, following the passage of the Citizenship Amendment
Bill (CAB) in Parliament.
The new citizenship
law has triggered massive protests in different parts of the country, including
Capital, Delhi. Moreover, some State governments have announced that they would
not allow the NRC to be implemented in their States, the most vocal being West Bengal,
Punjab and Delhi. However, experts are of the opinion that State governments
lacked the power to refuse to implement a Central law like the CAB. Some lawyers
even cited constitutional provisions to stress that any move by a State to
disregard a parliamentary enactment may lead to the dismissal of its
government.
It is generally
believed that the new Act violates the right to equality guaranteed to all
under Article 14 of the Constitution. The amendments follow from pre-poll
promises of the BJP to grant citizenship to Hindu immigrants from Pakistan and
Bangladesh. The negation of Pakistan as a natural homeland of Muslims became
conclusive after the creation of Bangladesh. Although Muslims in India are now
frequently told to go there by some political leaders, Pakistan has not
extended any special offers of citizenship to Indian Muslims. India’s tryst with CAB and NRC will lead to
unequal treatment assuming a formal form and get embedded in citizenship
In a statement
endorsed by over 770 scientists and scholars from several institutions
expressed displeasure at religion being used as a criterion for citizenship
which “would mark a radical break with history (equal treatment of people of
all faiths) and would be inconsistent with the basic structure of the
Constitution. Referring to Article 14, they pointed out that it prohibits the
State from denying “to any person equality before the law or the equal protection
of the laws within the territory.
Delving into the
basics of citizenship, one may refer to UNESCO, which defined it as “the status
of having the right to participate in and to be represented in politics.” It is a collection of rights and obligations
that give individuals a formal juridical identity. The Citizenship Act, 1955
provides various ways in which citizenship may be acquired. It provides for
citizenship by birth, descent, registration, naturalization and by
incorporation of territory into India. In addition, it regulates registration
of Overseas Citizen of India Cardholders (OCIs), and their rights. An Overseas
Citizen of India is entitled to some benefits such as a multiple-entry,
multi-purpose life-long visa to visit India.
Union Home Minister
Amit Shah stated in Parliament on November 20 that the National Register of
Citizens (NRC) would be prepared for every State. At present, only Assam has
such a register, wherein it is basically a list of Indian citizens living in
the State. The citizens’ register sets out to identify foreign nationals in the
State that borders Bangladesh. The process to update the register began
following a Supreme Court order in 2013, with the State’s nearly 33 million
people having to prove that they were Indian nationals prior to March 24,
1971.The updated final NRC was released on August 31, with over 1.9 million
applicants failing to make it to the list.
Possibly, keeping in
view the large-scale protests over the NRC, the CAB proposed amnesty to all
illegal immigrants, whether Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and
Christians, from Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan. But it has been pointed
out that the amendment to the Citizenship Act 1955 strikes at the root of
principles of equality. The amendment in favour for the exclusively named
minorities from only three countries would openly display India’s hostility to
South Asian Muslims. However, under the present citizenship law, one of the
requirements for citizenship by naturalisation is that the applicant must have
resided in India during the last 12 months, as well as for 11 of the previous
14 years. The amendment relaxes the second requirement from 11 years to 6 years
as a specific condition for applicants belonging to these six religions, and
the aforementioned three countries.
Obviously, the BJP
wants to prove that Hindus caught in the NRC’s dragnet need not fear because
its main intention was to protect the majority community. If the NRC is carried
out in all States, the government will be able to legally single out Muslims
for investigation. It is indeed strange why this community does not come under
the purview of the amendment bill. Is the government bent on unsettling the
citizenship status of the country’s Muslims?
Another important
fallacy is that while Afghanistan, which does not share a border with India, is
included in the amendment bill while Myanmar, which does border our country has
been omitted as it would have been ideologically inconvenient for the ruling
party here to include that country as it has been cleansing its Muslim
population and they may have come to India for shelter.
In a democratic and
egalitarian society, where most politicians swear by the name of secularism
such attitude towards Muslims cannot be justified. While many chief ministers
have been highly critical of the NRC, world opinion would also not be in favour
of such action. Even the United Nations has criticised the CAB and internal
opinion is very much against this.
Political analysts
have begun to ponder whether pressurising the States to create a national
register would at all benefit the party. But as the economic situation is
getting worse and expectations of any improvement in the first half – or even
the send half -- of 2020 appears grim, the BJP may bank on NRC or even the
Ayodhya verdict to garner votes. But basic necessities like food and shelter,
specially in the rural and backward areas, may gain precedence over their
religious moorings.
But people are
getting educated and conscious of the ploys of politicians to remain in power.
The over emphasis to make India a Hindu Rashtra may backfire as the Muslims and
Christians are even now very much against the BJP. With its pro-Hindu stance,
how can it think of coming to power, say in West Bengal and many other States
where Muslims and Christians have significant numbers?
If we consider South
India, there is significant share of minorities and with education and
awareness levels quite high, such proposition may even be rejected by a major
section of Hindus. Most people the undersigned had the opportunity to talk to
in Kolkata, Delhi and Bangalore were highly critical of the NRC and even
pointed out that the apex court should be approached against such moves.
As we are in the
midst of Mahatma Gandhi’s 159th birth anniversary who talked of communal unity,
cooperation and fair treatment to all in an inclusive set-up, where masses have
a say in the decision-making process and when these values are being propounded
the world over, imposing NRC would go against democratic rights of citizens,
specially the major minority that is Muslims. Moreover, at a time when we talk
of modern governance, can this find any justification, except that of vengeance
and hatred?---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|