Round The
World
New Delhi, 6 December 2019
India-Sweden Ties
EXPANDING COMMONALITIES
By Dr. D.K. Giri
(Prof. International Politics, JMI)
In the wake of a high
level delegation visit from Sweden accompanying the king Carl XVI Gustaf and
Queen Silvia, it was said that the ‘the ties between India and Sweden have been
on an upward trajectory in the last few years’. My remit here is to see if
these assertions reflect customary diplomatic niceties; or if they correspond
to the realities in bilateralism. A related hypothesis to examine is whether
India could be the biggest Asian trade and development partner of Sweden.
The Swedish
delegation consisted of the Minister of Foreign Affairs Ann Linde, Minister for
Business, Industry and Innovation. Ibrahim Baylan, the Vice-Minister of Health
and Social Affairs, (equivalent to a Secretary, Government of India), Maja
Fjaestad, and score of high level business Houses like Ikea, Ericsson, and
Tetrapak. Obviously, Sweden would be exploring trade and investment
opportunities in India. About 170 Swedish companies, either in joint ventures
or in wholly-owned subsidiaries, are operating in India.
The volume of
Swedish-India bilateral trade is around 3.37 billion USD; whereas Sweden’s
trade with China stand at around 5.8 billion USD. This is something that should
worry New Delhi, and Stockholm should rethink its trade policy in keeping with
its much-vaunted stance on human rights and democratic politics. This should be
the crux of dialogue between Stockholm and New Delhi.
Taking a critical
look at both countries’ political culture, one could explore the first patch of
the common ground. Both countries have a strong record on democracy, although
Sweden is a developed country and India is still under developing countries
categories. Interestingly, not to the knowledge of many in both countries,
Sweden and India have similar political practices.
The biggest political
party in Sweden, the Social Democratic Party (SAP) now in government, does not
have a party leadership election. The leader is chosen by a committee of “wise
men and women”. Similar is the case in India, In fact, the political parties
are pilloried by observers for not conducting the intra-party election. Remember,
elections are not the only criteria for democracy. Second, Swedish politics is
largely based on consensus, which is also the intrinsic fundamental Indian
value.
The oldest indigenous
democratic institution in India, the ‘Panchayat’, (rule by five) was based on
consensus. Indian culture essentially represents synthesis despite its huge
cultural diversities. Alas, after the adversarial politics injected as British
colonial legacy, India tears itself apart politically. Notably, in the Swedish
Parliament, the members are seated alphabetically and region-wise not as
treasury and opposition. This suits India’s culture too.
Third, Sweden is
strongly and consciously moving towards multiculturalism, which is inherent in
India. I recall a multi-party delegation from Sweden at the behest of Ann
Linde, then the International Secretary of SAP, now Foreign Minister, visited
India to study the multicultural democracy in India. This is an area where New
Delhi could extend a hand to Stockholm, from its experience of running a
multicultural politics.
The Diplomatic ties
between India and Sweden go back to 1949. Both countries converge on many
occasions and issues in international fora, Sweden supports India’s membership
of an expanded UNSC, membership of Nuclear Suppliers Group, and have supported
India joining the Missile Technology Control Regime. There are regular
high-level political visits from both countries. The Social Democratic Swedish
Prime Minister Olof Palme is quite popular in India. The Noble Peace Prize
conferred by Sweden and Norway is the highest civilian award in the world. Many
Indians have been the recipients, and all Indians value this honour coming
through Sweden to the entire world. The fragrance of fame and recognition of
deserving individuals permeates the entire universe of knowledge, creativity
and innovation.
Sweden has a strong
track record of defending democratic values, human rights, and feminist
perspectives. The current Foreign Minister reflects them all in her political
career, in all the positions she has held. One of the first things she did
after assuming charge of foreign affairs is to underline the feminist foreign
policy of her country. Her remarks on Kashmir also reflect such concerns. She
was urging a dialogue between India and Pakistan, which is the spirit of Shimla
Agreement, asking for lifting of the remaining restrictions in Kashmir as Government
of India is already doing, and expecting a long-term solution to the issue,
which all Indians seek. There was nothing material in her remarks that contrast
India’s positions.
Let us understand
that a Swedish politician, from a Social Democratic Party, once led by
legendary Olof Palme, will speak the language of democracy, gender equity,
human rights, welfarism etc. This should sound good to us as they are enshrined
in our Constitution and we largely try to follow them.
Having appreciated
the Swedish position and politics on issues, New Delhi should turn these
principles back to them in their trade and investment policies. All European
countries stand guilty of this mismatch between their political values and
trade priorities. But Sweden is less so; and they would listen more seriously
to the echoes of their own international statements.
What it means
precisely is that, how come China, with its pathetic record of human rights in
Tibet, Xinjiang, Tiananmen Square, now in Hong Kong and many other places is
the biggest Asian trade partner of Sweden amounting to 58 billion SEK trade,
nearly 6 billion USD! What steps Sweden is proposing to enhance trade with
India, which has maintained its democracy against heavy internal as well as
external odds? Pakistan is under international watch for terrorism aided and
abated by China. Has Sweden taken a clear position against Chin-Pak terror
axis?
Sweden known in the
comity of countries for speaking in favour of human rights, peace and harmony
across the world should not go on doing brisk business with China. If not, shall
we conclude then that, in keeping with Marxist axiom, it is the money that
matters at the end of the day? Not really! Sweden is by far the best example of
democracy and welfarism. Indians expect Sweden as we struggle to preserve them
in this part of the world to stand by us, not those structurally trampling
human rights.---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|