Events
& Issues
New Delhi, 7 August 2019
Rising Hate Crimes
DEMOCRACY IN PERIL?
By Dr. Oishee Mukherjee
Not just dissent but healthy
discussion and dialogue are key features of a democracy. Every citizen is entitled
to have the right to criticise the ruling party and its various actions – be it
in the political, economic or social realm. Also actions by other political parties
may come in for criticism. But, unfortunately, this criticism is not seen as
constructive, which would augur well for any democratic society.
The ruling party is
just a political party in the democratic system of a country and questioning or
criticising it does not make one ‘anti-national’ as is being made out to be, at
least in India. Thus, criticism may not mean that an individual or a group of
individuals are against the national ethos but have diverse approaches in
political and/or economic and social understanding. In this connection, the
recent open letters to the Prime Minister, first by those criticising lynching
and apathy and hatred towards minorities since the BJP came to power and the
counter by another group, saying that it was one-sided and voiced selective
outrage, are quite interesting as they project diverse viewpoints.
Last month, those critical
of the government sent an open letter to Prime Minister Modi, written by 49
eminent personalities, including filmmakers, vocalists and historians, which
said that lynching of Muslims, Dalits and other minorities must be stopped
immediately, and also stressing there is
“no democracy without dissent”. They came out with bare facts.
These referred to the
‘Face Checker in Database’ and the ‘Citizen’s Religious Hate-Crime Watch’, which
stated that religious identity-based crimes had gone up in the last nine years
and 62 per cent of the victims belonged to the Muslim community. Of the 254
religious identity-based hate crimes between 2009 and 2018, about 90 per cent
of the attacks happened after May 2014, adding that a country cannot have true
democracy without dissent. In fact, they pointed out that people should be
allowed to lead their own lives as long as they do not violate rules and
regulations of the land.
On the other hand 62
other celebrities hit back promptly with another open letter, describing the 49
as self-styled ‘guardians’ and ‘conscience keepers’ of the nation and accused
them of “selective concern and demonstrated a clear political bias and motive”. They merely tried to defend the Modi
government.
Given the two groups
arguments, one finds it difficult to deny the fact that the attitude of the
present government towards minorities, specially Muslims, as per media reports,
leaves much to be desired. International media too has reported the rise in
hate crimes. These widespread reports of Muslims being lynched, tortured and
even killed just because they may not toe the official line or practise a
different religion is indeed quite distressing.
Worse, the latest
trend of chanting of ‘Jai Shri Ram’
has now become synonymous with nationalism, and has been reduced to “provocative
war cry”, which obviously impacts and deprives the minorities to preach and
practise their own religious beliefs.
It is also
distressing to note that colonial era laws are being used to suppress freedom
of expression. One may refer here to Mahatma Gandhi, who was charged under
Section 124A (sedition) of the IPC on which he aptly observed: “If one has no
affection for a person or system, one should be free to give the fullest
expression to his disaffection, so long as he does not contemplate, promote or
incite to violence”.
The present attitude
of equating any critique of the government or State or even the party in power
with ‘anti-nationalism’ is to devalue nationalism itself to the level of
‘lumpen evangelism’. The conflict between democracy and nationalism should not
arise in a mature republic like India. The ruling party must not forget Article
19 of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and expression.
The government must
that in a diverse country like ours, with different castes and creeds,
different religious identities etc., people should be allowed to follow their
own path of belief and feel secure to lead their lives of course without
violating the laws of the land. But unfortunately this is not happening. The secular
spirit has been eroded and imbecile justifications are being advanced and
threats issued to those who go against the religious beliefs of so-called
Hindutva.
The question here
arises is whether Hindutva, which is being practised presently is a true
reflection of Hinduism. Analysts feel that aggressive Hindutva has led to
curtailment of individual rights, specially of those belonging to the poor and
weaker sections. At least religious leaders like Ramakrishna and Vivekananda
always emphasised the need for religious unity and also pointed out that the
essential values of all religions were the same.
The present trends
clearly point out that an aggressive political society today has made life
insecure for the common man. As law-abiding citizens, where do they seek
recourse as they live in a virtual state of fear if they are not part of the
so-called “Majority”? While on the one
hand, big statues such as Sardar Patel’s are being constructed and Mahatma
Gandhi’s 150th birth anniversary is being celebrated with leaders talking about
his life and mission, on the other, they are violating the basic principles of
equality and justice.
As is well known,
Gandhi, in his political and social struggle, was influenced by intrinsic
values of Christianity, Islam, apart from Hinduism. Can we then not say that
right to life is being violated at every step by the government?
The intolerance in
society, manifest through increase in hate crimes, cannot be allowed to
continue. But then intellectuals, religious leaders and social activists have
to come together to propagate the true meaning and essence of religion. The
ulterior motive of clinging to power should not be allowed to be accomplished
by misinterpreting religion and playing with peoples’ sentiments.
Apart from freedom of
thought and expression, rights of the struggling masses have to be restored so
that they could live with dignity. Thus, the approach of the government must change
from mixing religion with politics to a genuinely pro-poor approach that would
evolve a genuine action plan for rural regeneration, more employment
opportunities, entrepreneurship development at the grass-root levels along with
more power to the panchayats for a real democracy to be functional.
People have started
realising that the majoritarianism is just a ploy of the government to come
away from crucial economic and social issues. Thus the present government’s
over enthusiasm with religion and nationalism is just to hide its inefficiency
in tackling more pressing matters that could really bring in transformation and
improve the living standards of the masses.
It is only time that
even illiterates will realise this and understand the fact that we have to live
in society in harmonious and communitarian manner and this was emphasised by
none other than luminaries like Mahatma Gandhi and Rabindranath Tagore.---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|