Events And Issues
New Delhi, 8 January 2007
India-US N-Deal
UPA GOVERNMENT’S
TRUST-US APPEAL
By T.D. Jagadesan
The new norm for governance? If there is no threat to our
survival, it doesn’t matter what the people think about our Government. It was
nowhere more apparent than in the two Houses of Parliament during the recent
winter session, where member after
member got up to voice his or her serious reservations about the India-US
civilian nuclear deal. But instead of answering the specific issues, the Government merely turned around and said
that it was going ahead with the deal, that Parliament should now wait to judge
it over the bilateral 123 Agreement as and when it was ready after the
negotiations that officially have still to begin, but unofficially are in an
advanced stage.
It was clear to the Government even before the debate that
the CPI (M) was not going to press
the issue, and was quite willing to
give the Government as much time as it required to complete the bilateral
negotiations, even though the Hyde Act had violated every single assurance given by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to
Parliament. The fact that there was no threat of an anti-vote in Parliament,
brought out the belligerence in the Government that could barely defend the US legislation but, sought to buy approval by
underlining its concerns for India.
A section of the media that always supports money spinning
policy decisions and opposes pro-people measures like reservations, came out in
full support, carrying editorials trashing the nuclear scientists, their new
bogemen and defending the deal that carries a cash reward of US$100 billion
from India. To give effect to cause, Prime Minister Singh has now had a happy
conversation with the US
President ostensibly to convey Indian concerns about the nuclear deal, but in
reality to shake hands over the telephone and congratulate each other for a job
well done.
New Delhi and Washington started to tango under the NDA
Government, but have perfected the steps under the Government watched over by
the Left parties. For, everyone in Washington knows, as
does Prime Minister Singh, that the nuclear deal is more than a contract for
nuclear civilian energy. The agreement of July 18 that every one here is happy
about, and even the Left has decided to accept for some strange reasons,
carries the details.
It is part of a larger strategic goal that the conferences
of the US Congress have pointed
towards in their accompanying note to the Hyde Act. It is not just a deal but a strategic deal
that redefines US-India relations, with New
Delhi clearly the junior partner in a larger policy
initiative that makes a mockery of non-alignment.
What happened in Parliament? The Government said: Trust us,
we are good guys, we will not let India down. Most of the others,
even milder members like Jaya Bachchan and Rahul Bajaj, voiced apprehensions
about the deal, and by the end of two days it was clear for those who were
honest enough to see and hear, that the majority of members in Parliament were
apprehensive about the deal and did not want the Government to proceed. But
that they were not in a position to stop it, and for reasons best known to
them, were not willing to force a vote at this state.
Everybody bought the “trust us” appeal, and now India will wait
for the 123 Agreement that will be sold to the country as a “done deal.” Everyone in Washington
knows that everyone in Delhi appears to be
denying the wording of the bilateral agreement is going to be mild and
definitely not offensive, but the US part of the deal will be
governed by the intrusive Hyde Act. A CPM MP pointed this out in Parliament but
then went on to say that he was prepared to wait for the 123 Agreement. One
really could not understand why.
There are moments in history when action is required to save
the country from harm. One such moment has passed
with the Opposition to the nuclear deal, with all its strategic implications
for India,
now only destined to get weaker and less
effective. Prime Minister Singh and the US are working
together to get this agreement through, with the opposition and the media being
handled with amazing expertise.
The carrot is the preferred option, although at time the
whip too has paid some dividends. The only ones to withstand the tremendous pressure from this highly formidable establishment are
the nuclear scientists, good men with a level of integrity that makes them
impervious to both the carrot and the whip, with the result that they are being
targeted by the unscrupulous supporters of the deal.
First they were dismissed
as insignificant, when this did not work then attempts were made by the men at
the top to win them over, and now the attack has started again when the
scientists refused to compromise and insisted on having their honest say. The
other day, a former diplomat attacked them on a television channel asking
whether policy was now expected to be made by nuclear scientists. Who else then
should influence policy dealing with India’s nuclear programme retired
diplomats and compromised journalists?
This is for two reasons. One, Government today is highly
insecure and avoids transparency. Two, in this case the nuclear agreement is a
‘done deal’ insofar as the two signatories are concerned, and the process now can be roughly described as “going through the
motions” and managing the opposition.
The only real challenge remains at the level of the Nuclear Suppliers
Group where there can be a level of unpredictability at the end of the day despite
the US and Indian efforts to control all the members with assurances.
The rest is taken care of, and just has to be unfolded in a
manner where Parliament restricts its intervention to nothing more than a
debate and the Left continues to be persuaded that the Government is secular
and democratic. If it is true, as all
the recent actions taken by the Government and its policy initiatives indicate,
that there is a decided shift towards the United States, then is it not time
that the Ministry of External Affairs and the Prime Minister’s office comes out
with a declaration against India’s new foreign policy?.
Instead of allowing senior officials in Government to inform
select journalists that non-alignments as a concept is dead, will it not be
more honest for this Government to come out and say that it does not believe in
an independent foreign policy? And that
it actually believes, as its officials keep saying off the record that
alignment with the US
is the preferred and only acceptable option now?
Let the Government, if it believes so avidly in the line it
is pursing, stop the pathetic personal attacks and the media propaganda, but
place a policy paper on the table justifying its stand. Put it to debate in bold print, and then let
the better argument win. This mean, snide manner of functioning where
journalists are being manipulated with carrots and incomplete information.
In fact, it erodes and corrodes the foundation of democracy
that had been built so painstakingly on political integrity, transparency and
accountability. Prime Minister Singh and President Bush with their handful of
advisers might have succeeded in pushing through a terrible legislation that
had addressed to the US interests, but in the process India
has lost as held by a school of thought.---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|