Home arrow Archives arrow Spotlight arrow Spotlight-2019 arrow Knifing the “Maharaja”, By Proloy Bagchi, 19 May 2019
 
Home
News and Features
INFA Digest
Parliament Spotlight
Dossiers
Publications
Journalism Awards
Archives
RSS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Knifing the “Maharaja”, By Proloy Bagchi, 19 May 2019 Print E-mail

Spotlight

New Delhi, 19 May 2019

Knifing the “Maharaja”

By Proloy Bagchi

 

The news has just come in that Government of Maharashtra has offered Rs 1400 crore for the iconic Air India building at Nariman Point, Mumbai. Though the amount offered is Rs 200 crore less than what was declared as the reserve price, Air India authorities were seemingly inclined to give away the building to the State government. The Life Insurance Corporation had offered Rs1375 crore whereas Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust Rs 1200 crore. Hence, by June-end one could hope the Maharashtra Government offices to move into the building. Perhaps even Chief Minister Fadnavis is likely to relocate to this building and one might find the National Flag on top of it instead of Centaur of the logo of Air India.

 

This building has been a remarkable structure dominating the business district that came up on what came to be known as Backbay Reclamations. I can recall that during my first visit to Mumbai (then Bombay) in 1955 tetra pods used to be built there as the work of reclamation went on. It was a vast expanse of sand and tetra pods would be lined up for being placed next to the parapet of Marine Drive along the Arabian Sea. Then this iconic building slowly took shape designed by an architect from New York. Facing the beautiful Marine Drive it came to dominate it, adding more sophistication to an already sophisticated artery lined by art-deco buildings.

 

Air India is steeped in debt of around Rs 50,000 crore and had decided to monetise its physical assets. It had put up its lease-hold rights over the land and the building for sale last December with a reserve price of Rs1600 crore. The sale was open to only various governments, their departments and public sector units. None of these entities, however, could muster an amount equal to the reserve price; the offer of Maharashtra Government happened to be closest to it. In all probability, therefore, its offices are likely to move in in a few months time.

 

Air India hit this sad predicament largely because of politicians who came to control the airline. Time was when Air India, to use a cliché, used to rule the skies and other up-and-coming airlines would try and learn micromanaging their assets from none other than its chief JRD Tata. Tata was a freak insofar as flying was concerned. His commitment to the airline from its initial days, when it had only two pilots and a few sundry employees, was basically the reason for its becoming an exemplar for others.

 

In the 1960s when Air India was still flying propeller-driven planes, connoisseurs would still opt for the slower Indian planes than the faster jets for the simple reason that Air India would pamper them. For the sake of the high quality service they would think nothing of sacrificing a few measly hours that could earn them a few thousand dollars.

 

That is when it suffered the first assault from a politician. In the 1970s, Morarji Desai as Prime Minister issued a dictat that no alcohol could be served on Air India’s international flights. JRD Tata fought the fiat tooth and nail but had to resign, as Morarji was, if not more, resolute than Tata. With Tata’s exit, service standards dived southwards and the clientele that Tata had built up progressively deserted the Airline. At the same time, competition hotted up and those who were pigmies when Tata was around put more heft in their operations and left Air India miles behind.

 

Then came the era of “coalition compulsions” -- UPA’s two terms at the Centre that administered blow after blow to the Airline that had the sobriquet of “Maharaja” and was soon enough to lose all the trappings of royalty leaving, people asking “who killed the Maharaja?” No, none from the outside; it was a well executed inside job.

 

While unaffordable order for as many as 111 planes was placed, the Airline inexplicably surrendered profit-making routes to Middle-East/ South-East Asia and Europe to its competitors. The Public Accounts Committee, when seized of the matter, found that it was the Ministry of Civil Aviation that wouldn’t listen to protestations of Air India and Indian Airlines and surrendered to their competitors, what were essentially milch cows for them.

 

Thus, we had a situation where Indian planes would fly half empty to these destinations, whereas airlines like Emirates would rake in unconscionable plane-loads of air traffic from the Indian hinterland in the new environment of generous “bilaterals” under India’s curious version of “Open Skies”. Air India, thus, lost out to foreign airlines under the Ministry of Civil Aviation’s direction, the traffic that legitimately was its own.

 

Everything that was done to bring the Airline down was done by the Ministry of Civil Aviation which in those turbulent days was being headed by Praful Patel, who was a contribution to the UPA-I government of Manmohan Singh of, ironically, NCP, headed by Sharad Pawar. No “nationalist” with the slightest of feelings for the nation and its people could ever have shot down a high flying asset of the nation like Air India in the way Patel did.

 

R Jagannathan, Editor in-Chief of the perceptive Firstpost wrote in a feature the technique adopted by Patel to kill Air India. Basic proposition was to load it with heavy loans that it could never raise its head again. An airline with a revenue of Rs 7000-crore was asked in 2004 to take on debt of Rs 50000 crore -- the cost of the new aircraft, the number of which was arbitrarily inflated from 28 to 68 without any revenue plan or route map for deployment of the additional aircraft.

 

Likewise, Jagannathan says Patel was a great promoter of merger of Air India and Indian Airlines by pitching up the synergetic operations of both. However, in the process he forgot that both the airlines were incurring losses and were in every other way were unequal. Their manpower was differently trained, the compensation mechanisms were different and so on. The ultimate result was neither could pull the other up from the morass each was sinking into. No wonder, both, together, have run up a huge resources crunch that, many experts feel, is impossible of mitigation.

 

In the midst of this unmanageable crunch again the Ministry (read Patel) decided to withdraw Air India from the profit-making routes that largely sustained it. What one gets to feel is that it was the best example of crony capitalism; for example, the lucrative S-E Asian routes were surrendered to Kingfisher Airlines – an airline that Patel used to patronise while flying between Delhi and Mumbai. Vijay Mallya was apparently much more than a friend, in fact, a crony.

 

While bringing down the “Maharaja” Patel seems to have covered his tracks very well. In achieving what he achieved, he reportedly moved files at supersonic speed from one authority to another. Every establishment concerned was kept in the loop so that the murder of the airline could be presented as a “collective and consensual” effort! ---INFA

 

(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)

New Delhi

17 May 2019

< Previous   Next >
 
   
     
 
 
  Mambo powered by Best-IT