Open Forum
New
Delhi, 8 March 2019
Politics of Sharing
INDIAN VERSION OF
ALLIANCES
By Dr. S.Saraswathi
(Former Director,
ICSSR, New Delhi)
Veteran leader
Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party, one of the biggest challengers to a
second term for the BJP, speaking in the Lok Sabha on the last day of the last
session, sprang a surprise to all by declaring that he wished for Narendra
Modi’s return as PM after the polls. It
did not sound like a formal courtesy for a leader at the end of his term of
office or a passing remark without any intention, but as a considered wish
coming from a senior politician.
In an interaction
with party workers, he expressed his disapproval of seat sharing formula made
by his party with the BSP in near equal proportion. He lamented that party people themselves were
out to destroy the party, which he had built. The pact is unique as a tie up
between two former CMs of two rival parties of a State.
The speech is an example
of inner contradictions in alliance politics. After concluding a pact for UP, the
SP and the BSP are set to extend the electoral alliance to Uttarakhand and
Madhya Pradesh. The central feature is omission of the Congress.
Successive elections
since the 1970s have done a yeoman service to the representative system of democracy
in India in according a recognised place for political party alliances and
coalition governments. The two have now
become indispensable part of general elections and government formation at the
Centre and in many States even under undisputed pre-eminence of one party or clear
majority for a single party. But, what
is going on in the name of alliances and coalition is the politics of sharing
power and positions.
Strange but true –
all political parties seek alliances and have voluntarily shed off the restriction
to “like-minded parties” as irrelevant and of no consequence. It is an outmoded
idea not applicable to a multi-party system with hundreds of political
parties. Minds can think, say, and do
anything, but remain united in voting whenever survival demands unity. This is at the core of all types of alliances
– pre-poll, post-poll, outside support, and issue-based support. The sole object is to capture the government
in an election, to save the government for ruling alliance or defeat a
government for those in opposition. At
other times, the partners are free to indulge in mutual criticism. Decency, embarrassment, inconsistency are
unknown in politics.
It is sought to be
justified by repeated assertion that in politics, there is no permanent enemy or
permanent friend. As it is convenient
for everyone, there is no dispute about it.
Both Congress and the
BJP have to confer the role of alliance leadership in many States to the
pre-eminent local party. In Tamil Nadu,
both of them are junior partners – BJP to AIADMK and the Congress to the
DMK. Similarly, BJP stays behind JD(U)
in Bihar and SAD in Punjab. This
strategy works in some States in the North-Eastern Region. Local party leadership is for election
purposes while the alliance is named the NDA.
Barely, 13 months
after the Shiv Sena passed a resolution to contest alone in all future
elections, it made a U-turn by announcing alliance with the BJP. The PMK, a
strong critic of AIADMK for corruption and was negotiating with the DMK sealed
a pact with the AIADMK and has become part of NDA. SP
and BSP, competitors for UP throne have joined hands to corner bulk of the 80 Lok
Sabha seats in UP.
Still, certain
combinations are unthinkable like Congress and BJP, DMK and AIADMK, and TMC and
CPI(M). All of them are leaders
competing for the seat of government.
Several quotable
quotes have emerged elucidating the characteristics of the politics of
alliances shaping in the country.
“We are accusing each
other, but we are friends”, said Sonia Gandhi to Mamata Banerjee who was visibly
annoyed at the joint attack of the Congress and CPI (M) in the parliament over
the chit fund scam. Bengal CM replied that
she would remember what happened in Parliament.
Looking back, we can recall how she fared as alliance partner in NDA
government of Vajpayee.
“Poll alliances and
party ideologies are two different matters”, said Tamil Nadu CM justifying
electoral alliance between AIADMK and PMK important to prevent PMK from joining
the DMK in Assembly by-elections. To the
PMK, one of the harshest critics of the AIADMK, it is a change in strategy to
win seats and not change in its stance. It says that it will continue to
criticise alliance partners.
The Indian version of
alliance politics compels the leaders to face critics outside and inside the
alliance. It can make the system more
democratic provided public interest underlies criticisms and not sheer show of
number game.
“Joint alliances are not forged based on
principles, but to bring down the enemies”, said another leader citing the
importance of a negative aim. This
object brings together sworn enemies. Existence
of multiple axis in multi-party alliances is common.
“The fight with the
Congress will remain in the State. At
the national level, we will fight together”, said Mamata affirming her dual
role. Similar is the situation for the
TDP also. However, it is still not clear
what stand the SP and BSP will take to reconcile their dual role vis-à-vis the
Congress.
Among the various
regional parties, the DMK and the AIADMK seem to be under compulsion of
circumstances to ally with the Congress and the BJP respectively and have no
other alternative. Other regional parties
like the TMC, TDP, SP, BSP, RJD, JD(S) have an option and have chosen to be
anti-BJP, but still undecided about leadership and even about having the
Congress in the alliance.
Among rare instances
in the politics of alliances, the AGP’s decision to sever ties with the BJP
over the issue of Citizenship Bill and possibilities of revival of ties with
the lapse of the Bill needs mention.
Political parties in
western democracies have declined as mass democratic parties in recent decades
especially in membership. On the contrary, parties in India continue to be
vibrant and their membership grows in millions. People’s interest in politics and political
leadership is growing due to several welfare schemes bringing the masses in
direct contact with political leaders at least in their locality. Parties occupy a central place in the
collective life of common people who
look upon them as the agents for transformation of their lives.
Party alliances are
very common in many countries like Brazil, Italy, and the Netherlands. Under the German Federal Electoral law,
members of a parliamentary group having the same basic political aims do not
compete with one another. In most
countries, parties fight under the banner of the larger party and campaign
together.
An alternative to
alliance is Electoral Fusion which is an arrangement where two or more parties
list the same candidate. Parties are separately listed, but candidate is
common. The system is also known as
cross endorsement, multi-party nomination, and plural nomination.
Such a system is
unworkable in India where parties remain separate not because of policy
differences, but for gaining political places.
Alliance is a strategy not for fusion but for sharing. ----INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|