Open Forum
New Delhi, 8 February
2019
Karnataka
Pattern
A
LESSON IN COALITION
By Dr.S.
Saraswathi
(Former
Director, ICSSR, New Delhi)
“Is this the way to run a coalition government, where
every day you have to request your coalition partner not to give
unparliamentary remarks?” asked former Prime Minister and father of the present
Chief Minister of Karnataka, H.D.Deve Gowda, after his son and CM offered to
resign.
Karnataka Chief Minister HD Kumaraswamy has been reiterating
his readiness to step down from his post in reaction to constant criticism of
his style of functioning by some Congress members, and this time has even
mentioned 6th February as the date. It has raised a doubt whether he
will present the Budget this year. On this, JD(S) President Deve Gowda asked the
Congress leadership to rein the State leaders, who were not allowing the CM to
work. “Things have already reached a final stage. Before the situation goes out
of control, the Congress high command must intervene and impress upon their
State leaders. I am seething with anger from within and watching the developments
carefully”, he said.
Karnataka presents a typical model of coalition
government that goes through crisis everyday and survives day-by-day true to
the proverb in Tamil, “nithya gandam,
purna aayush” (meaning a fatal danger every day and a complete life term).
Karnataka has earned the distinction of forming a
government headed by a Chief Minister driven to shed “political tears” over his
fate to head a coalition government of electoral rivals. Even when governments have fallen due to
internal frictions or by sudden withdrawal of promised support, no Chief
Minister or Prime Minister has ever been driven to exhibit his emotions so publicly.
Clearly, uneasy that wears the crown! How long the situation will last and how
it will end depends on the future course of Karnataka pattern of coalition
government of rivals.
The Congress and the JD(S), ever since the formation of
the coalition government in Karnataka are always bickering, which has become
more intense in view of approaching General election and seat-sharing
arrangements. The CM confirmed that he said that he would resign if Congress
leaders continued to take potshots at him. “How many more days can I tolerate
such stuff?” he asked at the National JD(S) Convention. All the three major
parties -- the BJP, Congress, and the JD(S) – are once again on election mood
with the hope to increase their individual strength.
Remember, the present coalition government is a post-poll
alliance between two rivals, who bitterly fought against each other in Assembly
polls. The present CM belongs to a party that ranks third in membership strength
in the Assembly far below the first. Neither by number nor by political
affinity, the coalition partners are on even level. On the contrary, they are
even now competitors to power and positions.
Deve Gowda seems to believe that Congress Chief
Siddaramaiah is nursing a grudge against him as one who scuttled his chances of
becoming CM twice – once in 1996 and then in 2004. The focal point of Karnataka coalition is the
post of CM and nothing else seems to matter.
The unstable coalition is constantly experiencing severe
shaking from within. The CM, who belongs to JD(S), which can have no legitimate
ambition with just 30 members to form the government, is forced to put up with
all kinds of insults and criticism from the Congress MLAs. One of them is reported to have remarked that
he considers only Congress Chief Siddaramaiah as the leader and not the JD(S)
chief as CM.
Fresh trouble started recently with fears about poaching
of coalition MLAs by the BJP, which is the largest party in the Assembly and is
short of a very few seats to get majority. The charge was returned by the BJP
also with the result that both the Congress and the BJP resorted to “resort
politics” to keep their flock intact.
‘Operation Kamal’, as it is named, has not yielded any substantial
results for the BJP so far. Two independents have come over to the BJP. The party
hopes to get the support of sufficient members of the Congress so that it can
claim majority to form the government. These developments expose the
instability of coalitions formed by parties that are numerically far below the
majority mark.
Karnataka model is bound to discourage gathbandhan and mahagathbandhan of dozens of parties, which will fight against one
another and join together after elections if conditions permit to form a
coalition government, which may prove to be more a collusion between opponents
than a harmonious understanding for good governance. The weakness of this model
is that neither of the partners is anywhere
near majority to nurse ambitions to form the government and leadership has gone
to a party ranking third in the legislative Assembly.
Post-poll alliances have become common in India. But, it
needs one strong central party much above other constituents in number. Regional
parties will have a bright future in national politics if they are not confined
to local politics and ally thoughtfully with a national party on national
issues.
Governance of the country is not the sum total of
governance of States and Union Territories, but covers the nation as a whole as
one united entity. Symbolic holding of hands together may make a visual impact
for getting votes, but not adequate for governance of the nation.
While national parties are often blamed for ignoring the
federal structure and principles, the attitude of regional parties in ignoring
over-all national interests in their preoccupation with State/regional
interests is overlooked. Federal fronts
are inherently weak in this sense and have to develop a national perspective
safeguarding regional interests.
Though forming what is called a surplus majority
coalition by a few seats, the partners in Karnataka government have no common
agenda or policy or sub-regional and geographical compatibility. Absence of a
pre-electoral seat-sharing as well as grievances in post-electoral portfolio sharing
makes a weak coalition. The minor partner being gifted with the post of CM is itself a weak
arrangement and a blatantly political arrangement with the sole aim of keeping
away the largest party from power which needs only a few members to stake claim
to form government. Meanwhile, it is reported that the JD(S) is exploring
possibilities of expanding its presence in other States.
Alliances and coalitions in India are certainly not
unique to the country, but the way they occur are. Almost all European countries
have coalition governments in which parties retain their identity. In Britain,
the Labour Party and the Cooperative Party form pre-poll alliances since they
came to an agreement in 1927. A Socialist Coalition of RMT, Socialist Party,
Solidarity candidates known as Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition was
formed to contest 2010 general election. Possibility of sharing a common list
of candidates and a common programme existed in the Dutch system between 1973
and 2017 and was abolished.
Karnataka pattern is a typical model of sharing power and
not ensuring stability and progress between two rivals designed by the Congress
and the JD(S) that deserves to be discarded, but needs to be studied for the
lessons it contains for tackling current electoral scenario.---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature
Alliance)
|