Economic
Highlight
New Delhi, 26
November 2018
Election Funding
MONEY MAKES INDIA GO
ROUND
By Shivaji Sarkar
Money decides political course! Indian
elections are rarely free of the role that money, gifts, liquor, and much more
play. Worse, this has not changed for decades.
1n 1967, a major political party campaign in
certain areas of Uttar Pradesh was not about caste or campaign, and was left to
the last few days to influence the voters of certain areas, inhabited by poor
or other workers. They valued liquor and their women cash. Both were distributed
after sun down as close to the polling day. The medicine usually worked. Even
in a dishonest campaign there was honesty!
A company manufacturing jeeps had given brand
new ones to the party in 1967 elections, when Lok Sabha and State Assembly
polls were held simultaneously. After extensive use in campaigning, most of
these went back to the company, which refurbished and sold these to gullible
customers. Many did not go back and in return the company reportedly got many
concessions as the party retained power.
Some years later, a correspondent saw
suitcases travelling and cash being paid for sundry works and a lot to the
voters in Delhi. Many were being paid for supposed work done. But there was
neither a receipt nor a bill. “It is trust with workers”, a party leader had
quipped.
In the present elections in five States -- Madhya
Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Telangana, and Mizoram -- all those old
methods are working but different leaders have found new ways to collect funds.
Some were called Mataji or Bhabhiji fund and some by other ubiquitous
names. It is a myth that mere hundreds of crores of funds collected by parties
are lubricating the election machinery. Goa, Manipur and Karnataka have also
shown the power of money.
It’s a wonder how much money is in
circulation. No guess works. The bigger surprise is how in a poor country,
where corporate are supposed to gasp, farmers commit suicide, workers are not
paid wages, how this large money flows in. The source of such bounty, though
not totally unknown, is also not easy to pinpoint.
The Association of Democratic Reforms had
given some data. And as per this the number of crorepati MPs has increased from
30 per cent in 2004 to 58 per cent in 2009 and 82 per cent in 2014. And thus
there are many self-financing candidates.
The political parties say that even if there
is little chance of winning many approach for tickets because that is licence
to collect or extort from businesses, corporate and other local funders. A part
may even flow into the parties and even bureaucrats contribute.
Unfortunately, there is no credible data on
the actual costs of the election expenses. The Election Commission on March 4,
2014 raised the limits to Rs 70 lakh for big States and Rs 54 lakhs for smaller
States. Earlier it was Rs 40 lakh and Rs 22 lakh respectively. Such figures no
doubt are there just to satisfy the Election Commission (EC). All voters,
spread in many districts with 10 to 30 lakh people in each constituency, cannot
even be reached with this money. (The Government’s poll expenses were Rs 11.60
lakh crore in 1971 and Rs 1,113.88 lakh crore in 2004).
One wonders why the EC has put such a Spartan
cap. Just going by its figures, say if there are on an average 10 candidates in
a constituency they together spend 7 crore and in 544 constituencies the
expenses officially would work out to Rs 3708 crore. It is a ridiculous sum.
Even if all this socialistic figures are taken into account, the expenses made
by parties are not added to the expenditure, though the EC is contemplating how
to do that.
This apart there are many indirect funding by
“friends” and “supporters”. The cost of using official carriers or defence
aircraft by ruling party and hiring aircraft by all political parties are
another grey area. Some of the official organs of the Government say they end up
having funded elections as the expenses incurred remain unpaid by parties. Then
there is a huge cost on media, including social media, advertising, surrogate ads,
‘paid news’ and host of other expenses which are rarely officially accounted
for.
The EC says reduction of campaign time has
reduced expenditure. But when elections in States like UP are held in four phases,
the candidates who contest the election in the last phase in actuality have to
spend much more than the others. The candidates say that since the EC
introduced a new system and imposed the code of conduct, unofficially the
average campaigning time has increased to a minimum of two months or more.
This means even on routine expenses on
workers, organizing meetings, funding many marriages of friends and
acquaintances increase. There would be few contestants who can pay such
expenses from their pockets. It is raised through “donations”. And there could
be a quid pro quo.
The belief that such finances come from
titans is also possibly not true. Much of the action is at “mezzanine” level as
former Chief Election Commissioner TN Seshan had said. That is the medium sized
firms, businesses, real estate and builders.
The politicians are stated to help them in
many regulatory processes and also in keeping off the taxmen and extortionists
at bay. A Ludhiana pakorawalla was
caught in an income tax raid and had to cough up Rs 60 crore recently. Such
people also help politicians.
But still politicians are trusted by people
because they save them from the wrath of bureaucrats, policemen, regulators and
lubricate the system. They many times act as the negotiator between an official
raider and the supposed offender. In many States, even an inflated electric
bill is settled with their intervention.
These may be termed illicit funds but most of
the fundings are a kind of insurance for protection. That is huge money and no
guess would be correct. Demonetisation or not the cash flow in the Indian
system has not come down. Prior to the present election to five states, the RBI
came out with figures of high cash flow. Withdrawals from banks had
tremendously gone up. There are also unconfirmed reports that many politicians
had to access cash at payment of a premium to the underground market. Note-ban thus has made the currency tradable.
Even political parties assess the monetary
power of candidates. Some parties are known to sell their tickets to the
highest bidder. Democracy, former Congress leader Late VN Gadgil used to say,
is an expensive proposition. Crony capitalism thrives through elections. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|