Spotlight
New Delhi, 25 October 2018
Eradicating Poverty
MERE TALK, LACK OF ACTION
By Oishee Mukherjee
There is much talk of
development with ruling political leaders harping on what all is being done. But
the way politicians talk of development at the smallest opportunity, it is
necessary to analyse the reality over the years. People, who really matter, are
not much bothered as they take politicians’ claims with a pinch of salt and the
poor, impoverished, who obviously are supposed to be the major beneficiaries,
don’t get justice.
While the 2018 Global
Multidimensional Poverty Index, of the United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP) and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, may sound quite
encouraging that around 270 million Indians moved out of poverty, the fact is
that it took a full decade from 2005-06 to 2015-16. Thus, though poverty rate
nearly halved during the 10-year period, it is still quite high at 28 per cent.
Experts suggest the need for an assessment of the number of people who are near
the poverty line and this may be around 8 to 10 per cent.
Clearly, this reflects
the failure of the political system during the above period as the performance
of a country like India should have been far better. Poverty eradication plans has
been there since the 70s but in practical terms the rural poor continue to
languish in poverty and squalor. Obviously, there is need for understanding the
many ways in which people experience poverty while reminding us that
eliminating it is a challenging task and far from impossible, rightly pointed
out the UNDP Administrator Achim Steiner.
The fact that
mitigation of poverty has been moving at a snail’s pace is justified in another
report. A recent global assessment of human capital ranked India 158th among
195 countries in investments in education and healthcare as measures towards
commitment to welfare objectives. Researchers at the University of Washington,
who led the study, stated that health and education advocates should fight for
garnering more resources towards these two areas.
Under-investing in
people may be driven by lack of policy attention to the levels of human
capital, outlined Dr. Christopher Murray, Director, Institute of Health Metrics
and Evaluation at the Washington University. In India, there has been
nationwide concern regarding the need to focus on the health sector and
substantially increase public expenditure which has remained more or less
static at 2 per cent of GDP. This happens to be much less than similar rapidly
developing countries such as Brazil, China, South Africa, etc. Meanwhile, a
very recent study found that 4300 deaths occur in India every day due to
inadequate or ineffective diagnosis or treatment, as per a global study.
The question then
arises is that mere statements or expressions of interest cannot transform the
situation and improve the living conditions of the bottom 35 to 40 per cent of
the population. It is not just about people living in starvation, but encompasses
many areas such as gender discrimination, child marriage, violence, safe
delivery and reproductive rights, the possibility of child survival on birth,
breastfeeding and availability of nutritious food for children, maternity
rights, protection of natural resources and community rights etc.
The low position of
India in the index indicates also reflects the situation among the backward and
tribal sections of society, which amount to 11 million-odd people. They have
their own cultural, social identity and lifestyle and have consciously made use
of natural resources to overcome starvation. But global economic policies have
taken away their water, their forest and their culture based system!
According to UNICEF’s
‘Nutrition and Tribal People - A Report on Nutrition - Situation of India's
Tribal Children’, (2016-17), when there is sustained food insecurity in a family
and society, the growth of children is more prone to be stunted. With this,
children remain sick, the environment of school is not good due to adverse
conditions and later in life they cannot play the role of a good healthy
citizen. This situation is obviously created due to poverty, food insecurity,
not getting adequate nutrition for women, not getting adequate mother’s milk
and poor lifestyle.
In some selected States
-- Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh,
Maharashtra, Orissa, Rajasthan and Telangana, around 50 lakh tribal children’s
growth has been found to be stunted. Obviously, it is the constitutional responsibility
of the government to pull tribal society not just out of starvation but also
ensure it basic necessities of life. Recall, Parliament way back in 2006 had enacted
the Forest Rights Act so that tribals were freed from encroachment of forest
land.
According to this
law, tribal and other forest dwellers were given legal rights to land up to 10
acres of their occupation. Its collective rights were also included so that
they could get uninterrupted rights even on forest produce, dry wood,
medicines, water, fruits and vegetables. It was a mandatory step for their
dignity and freedom from hunger. What happened to its fate? As per the Tribal
Development Ministry report, till February 2017, a total of 41.65 lakh claims
were made for personal and community interests in India, of which 18.47 lakh
were rejected! In majority of cases, as per legal provisions, the claimants
were not given reasons for rejection of their application.
The whole approach of
successive governments hasn’t been pro-people or geared to uplift the
conditions of the poor and economically weaker sections. The lack of
opportunities of the impoverished has increased with every passing day and the
administration remains a silent spectator.
The lack of vision is
also manifest in rising inequality and concentration of wealth in the hands of
the rich in many countries, including India. According to Barclays Hurun India
Rich List, the number of rich with wealth of over Rs 1000 crores has shown a
quantum jump to 831 individuals in 2018 from 214 last year.
Thomas Picketty with
his colleague, Lucas Chancel, World Inequality Lab delved into the subject and
found that as far as India is concerned, the richest 10 per cent Indians
increased their incomes more than four-fold, the richest 1 per cent seven
times, 0.1 per cent 11 times, 0.01 per cent 17 times and 0.001 20 times. The
bottom 50 per cent got 11 per cent of the income, the next 40 per cent got 23
per cent, the top 1 per cent got 29 per cent and the top 0.001 per cent – that
is one out of one lakh – got 2.8 per cent. Besides, there were 7943 people in
the top most group, each got a million and an average of Rs 188 million.
Similarly, Forbes says since 2005 the share of the richest Indians has exceeded
10 per cent.
All this clearly
proves that developmental strategy has benefitted the rich and partly towards
the upper middle income sections. Over the years, the condition of the bottom
35-40 per cent hasn’t undergone any fundamental change. A note or warning has
been sounded by the recently released ‘Special Report of the IPCC’ which has pointed
that if global warning breaches the 1.50 C level and reaches 2 degrees C by
2030, of which there is every possibility, the increase may occur in poverty levels
in India and other Third World Countries. Whether the situation will change in
the next 4-5 years is difficult to predict, as it solely depends upon the genuine
desire and political will of the nation’s leadership.---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|