Political Diary
New
Delhi, 12 June 2018
Gaon
Bandh
LIFE
BETWEEN STRIKES
By
Poonam I Kaushish
In this season of civic apathy and economic
disgruntlement, clearly strikes are the flavour of the season. Over the decades,
India has trudged the treacherous protest road bringing things to such a pass
that life is about living between strikes. Curse all you want, it’s for a
cause, remember. Wherein a person’s freedom ends at the tip of the others
nose!
Think. From June 1 to 10 farmers from 172
organisations across the country led by the Rashtriya Kisan Mahasangh and the
Kisan Ekta Manch held a 10-day ‘Gaon Bandh’ to draw attention to the ongoing
agrarian crisis. As part of the protest farmers decided not to sell their
produce to cities primarily as they wanted urban folks to understand their
misery and make the Government realise the kisans
importance.
Their major demands, complete loan waiver,
minimum support price that is 50% higher than all input costs and income
assurance. However, what makes their case strikingly apart from other bandhs is that it’s for the first time
that farmer organizations across the board have resorted to what is the
favourite tool of their blue-collared brethren.
And they seem to have struck gold with
Parties falling over each other to pander to farmers demands. Recently,
Karnataka has promised a waiver of all farm loans up to Rs 50,000. Ditto the
case in Rajasthan, Punjab, Maharashtra, UP etc. Paradoxically, the loan waivers have opened a
Pandora’s Box for other States with many like Raje prowling for a shortfall of
Rs 6500 crores.
Consider. The kisans are a large vote-bank as over 65% of the population lives
and works in agriculture or activities thereof. But, over the last 25 years the
share of farming in the economy has shrunk from over 33% to 15% resulting in crippling
high indebtedness with over 346,538 farmers committing suicide in 20 years, an
average of 16,500 deaths annually or 45 deaths every day, according to the
National Crime Records Bureau. But the actual number is treble aver agriculturists.
In Maharashtra suicides are the norm and in Punjab almost 6,926 farmers and farm
labourers in 11 districts committed suicide till two years back.
Not
only farmers but turn North- South, East-West, any mohalla, city or State on any given day, the story is the same.
Some disgruntled group is on strike to protest some grievance or failure impairing
life
and bringing the country to a grinding halt. Call it a bandh,
hartal, rasta roko, chakka jam what you may matters little, India
thrives on protests. The word strike instills
a sense of dread perfecting the saying “jiski
laathi uski bhains”!
A sure give away of free India out of
control. Raising a moot point: Are strikes actually expression of freedom or
are they means of suppressing fundamental rights in a democracy? What drives
unions to strike? Is it to keep its flock together or ignominy of becoming
irrelevant? Guided by workers interest,
commitment for a better wages and quality of life or political considerations?
Arguably, not a few simply shrug it off with
“sab chalta hai attitude, this is Mera Bharat Mahan at its rudest and
crassest best.” Many assert “ki pharak painda hai”. But the fact is
that these strikes have exposed how dangerous this game has become replete with
violence, mayhem, deaths etc.
Tragically, India has travelled a long way
from Tilak’s “swaraj is my birth
right” to “strikes is my birth right.” Today, every other section of society
plans strikes as a matter of routine.
The National Capital numero uno
road --- Parliament Street resembles a battle ground. Heavily barricaded with
baton-wielding policemen, fire engines and police vans, it stands vandalized
every other day by slogan-shouting masses protesting about something. The cause
is immaterial. It is all about registering ones protest, the louder the better.
Success is measured through the prism of causing maximum dislocation and
discomfiture to people bringing work to a standstill.
Scandalously, India lost 11.73 lakhs man days
to strikes in 2017 which cost the country Rs 1,4350 crores according to the Labour Bureau. Compared to
2016, the number of man days lost increased by 44% resulting in 57% more
production loss last year. Textile workers in Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, IT
employees in Karnataka, multiple workers’ agitations in Kerala, defence
employees cross country including outside Parliament and Government employees
in different States.
Tamil Nadu lost the highest number of strike
days 5.74 lakhs in 2017, followed by Kerala 1.37 lakhs and Gujarat 99,880.
Gujarat reported the highest production loss at Rs 286 crores, West Bengal
followed with Rs 181 crores, 4,683 man-days. While industry leaders assert
strikes are indications of changing policies, labour unions argue the situation
is worsening with India’s future threatened, notwithstanding the Centre’s and
States boast of the best ecosystem for investment and entrepreneurship.
Clearly, part of the current paradox is
explained by the changed notion of strikes aka hartal aka bandh as a
form of protest. The original concept was centred on the logic the only way for
a disempowered people group to shake the system was agitate, from a gherao for more wages to a voluntary hartal against policy decisions. But
slowly perversion set in. A strike could be effective only if stoppage of work
could not be overcome easily by the system. Therefore, strikers use their power
base, including violence, to stall anything that spells change from the
routine.
Look at the irony. On one hand we talk of
India as the next super power with a strong economy on par with countries like
Japan, Korea and China. On the other, we fail to realize that strikes are a
hindrance to achieving this goal. In no civilised nations do Parties or trade
unions dare to justify deaths and severe citizens distress as necessary to
voice protest. Any call for a bandh should
come from the suffering aam aadmi not
from netas or corporate fat cats.
Undoubtedly, people are fed-up of bandhs each time some neta gets a headache. According to a
recent survey, three out of four people want a legal ban, 8 out of 10 favour
severe punishment or hefty fines for leaders. Surprisingly, only 15% believe in
strikes, 10% in voluntary participation and 60% support Gandhi’s form of civil
disobedience, peaceful dharnas and
candle lighting in genuine cases of injustice.
In sum, in a
milieu wherein adoption of strong-arm tactics to extract one’s pound of flesh
has become second nature, it is time to cry a halt to strikes. Remember, paralysing the State,
black-mailing corporates to get attention and policy reversals only exasperates
the public, cuts off money flow, shoos investors and endangers jobs.
Time to stop giving into strong-arm tactics,
change a bandh’s dynamics replacing it
with a new social contract. A referendum should be held for people to decide
what is right or wrong. This gives
higher bargaining power to citizens against Parties or unions who strike, holding
the State hostage to achieve their selfish interests.
India needs good governance and economic
growth where the citizen’s right is paramount. Questionably, can we afford
strikes? No. At some point we have to stand up and bellow, "Bandh karo ye natak!"--- INFA
|