Round
The World
New Delhi, 25 May 2018
Dropping
Iran N Deal
FALLOUT
FOR INDIA
By
Dr. D.K. Giri
Prof,
International Relations, JMI
Donald
Trump’s decision to pull out of the Nuclear Deal with Iran would have serious
implications for the entire world. Although many saw it coming, as Trump had
made a commitment during his election campaign, to withdraw from the nuclear
agreement. European signatories like French President Emmanuel Macron and
British Foreign Minister Boris Johnson dashed to the US to dissuade President Trump.
But he was adamant and has withdrawn, the European efforts ending in smoke.
Trump
was quite dismissive of the nuclear agreement with Iran. He had said, “This was
a horrible one-sided deal that should have never ever been made. It did not
bring calm, it did not bring peace and it never would.” He and his
administration were not sure that the deal was strong and tight enough to
prevent Iran from making a bomb. They had other apprehensions about Iran's
intent and seriousness on the deal.
The
US decision left many world leaders angry, despondent, alarmed, and frustrated.
It drew a chorus of opposition from the European traders who were party to the
agreement and had lobbied with US not to pull out of it. It may be recalled
that after over two years of grueling negotiations, the nuclear deal was struck
between Iran and seven others: The P5+ Germany and European Union in 2015.
Hectic efforts by EU to save the deal even with compromising on “Sunset
Clauses” did not save it.
Following
the announcement to withdraw, the US declared that it will re-impose newer and
stricter sanctions including against the Central Bank of Iran. Under the new
financial sanction regime, EU companies will have 90 to 180 days to wind up the
operations in Iran, or they run the risk of technical problems with American
Banking System. A French businessman was telling me that in the prevention
sanction system, the French company, BNP Paribas was obligated to pay the
American Bank $9 billion against their transactions in Iran.
The
second important fallout is sanction on oil which will force European and Asian
countries to reduce their imports from Iran, there are serious security
implications. A nuclear-armed Iran can be a potentially destabilising factor in
the Middle East. The reactionary rightist forces will be encouraged in Iran,
anti-American backlash will grow and spread beyond Iran. So far President
Mohammad Hossein Rahmani's reaction has been subdued. Iran's arch enemies in
the Middle East, Israel and Saudi Arabia seem to be cheered with US’s decision.
Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu praised the American move as a
historical move and sign of courageous leadership.
The
Europeans who were the other main stakeholders of the nuclear deal were
disapproving of America’s decision, vowed to carry out the agreement. They were
of the firm opinion that isolating Iran would have harsh repercussions on
Middle East situation and President Macron, German Chancellor Angela Merkal and
British Prime Minister Theresa May pointed out the UNSC resolution endorsing
the nuclear deal remained the International legal framework for the resolution
of disputes. Withdrawal of America would amount to violation of the Security
Council. European countries, long-term allies of USA are falling out on the
nuclear deal with considerable consequences for both.
What
is India’s reaction to US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of
Action (JCPOA), known as the Iran nuclear deal? What could be the consequence
for India? Iran and India have had sustainable bilateral transactions. New
Delhi was watching with trepidation, the negotiations between US and Iran, and
was dreading a war. The nuclear deal had precluded the possibility of war,
putting India at ease. But US going back on the deal has reviewed India's
security and economic concerns with Iran.
To
start with, New Delhi, in the line of its balancing stance, said that “All
parties should engage constructively to address and resolve issues that have
arisen with respect to JCPOA.” Since statements are almost vacuous as US has
already declared to withdraw. India could not have said otherwise, given its
relations with Iran. New Delhi and Tehran seem to have calculated the risks of
a US withdrawal and had decided to “immunise” their bilateralism from any
external factors.
There
are three major areas that are likely to be severely affected; one is 9-
million- strong Indian expatriate population. It will be stupendous task for
India to rehabilitate such a large number in case of a mass exodus. India has
had bitter experiences in the area whenever there has been a conflagration of
conflicts in the Middle East. The second is in the area of India’s
procurement. Iran is the third largest
oil supplier to it. Oil prices are already rising in India and when the
sanctions begin to bite, it could find it hard to offset the Iranian supply of
oil. Although Americans have assured that the oil supply from the Middle East
will not be disrupted, the oil- importing countries like India could not count
on such assurances.
The
third concern is about the Chabahar port. It was planned to make the port
operational in 2018, but the sanctions by the US may delay the time line and
overall operation of the project. New
Delhi could make a case for continuing with Chabahar port which gives
alternative access for India to Afghanistan, and Central Asia and Russia as
Pakistan denies land connectivity between India and Afghanistan.
New
Delhi has been nudged by US to engage in rebuilding of Afghanistan. Chabahar port
fits into the logistics of India’s several projects in Afghanistan. If New
Delhi fails to operationalise the port, China might step in, which will be a
double blow to India. Also the fallout of US withdrawal will test the
“Strategic Partnership” between US and India.
So
far, under Trump administration US-India relations have been largely
transactional. US, has been, decidedly tough on Pakistan while nudging India to
be pro-active in Indo-Pacific region, particularly South China Sea, to
obviously counter China. Through revival of “Quad” comprising
India-US-Japan-Australia, another security alliance brings US and India closer
to each other. Both countries’ relation with Russia has also been put in
perspective in their bilateralism. India-Israel’s new found partnership should
help build India and US relations. But all this would be tested hard in the
aftermath of Iran nuclear deal.
New
Delhi and Tehran would like to continue their friendly ties by insulating them
from the impending sanctions. How far would they succeed is a matter of their
diplomatic skills. Iran would need India as it gets gradually isolated and
likewise India would need Iran for its economic and strategic interest. New
Delhi has substantial interest in the Middle East, and having Iran, a rich and
militarily strong country on its side would be of immense help. Many observers
would suggest that New Delhi and Teheran could weigh the options like
Rupee-Rial trade, opening Iranian banks in India, and vice-versa to facilitate
movement of money and income. Such a move will insulate them from the dollar
market-regime.
All
in all, India will have to do a tight-rope walking to maintain the balance
between Iran and US, eventually it may have to pick a side. It will also have
to invest time and resources to talk to many other countries in Europe and
elsewhere to neutralize the fallout from the break-down of the Agreement. New
Delhi has quite a few burdens to carry. It better be prepared.---INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|