Open Forum
New Delhi, 21 February
2018
Environment &
Sustainability
REFORM SHARING OF
RESOURCES
By Dhurjati
Mukherjee
There is consistent discussion in the media as also
conferences in many parts of the country regarding environmental concerns and methods
of tackling these. But whether the innumerable studies and reports are being
actually implemented to counter the effects of climate change remain a big
question, not just in India but across the globe.
As regards India, the recently released Economic Survey warned that climate change was particularly alarming
since it suggested that farm incomes could drop by as much as a quarter if
global warming isn’t checked in time. In fact, the Survey pointed out that
climate change could reduce farm incomes by around 15 to 18 per cent in un-irrigated
areas in the medium term in the country. While the Survey stressed on
irrigation, it is also a fact that water availability per person or household
has been declining in recent years.
Another recent but significant study pointed out
that not a single country among 150 worldwide is able to deliver “good life to
all its citizens”, specially the poorer sections, with India among the bottom
20 in key indicators. Undertaken by researchers in UK and Germany and published
in the journal, Nature Sustainability (on February 5), the study suggests that though basic
needs have been achieved globally, the natural resource use pattern has been
far beyond sustainable levels.
As usual, India scores relatively low on every one
of the 11 social measures that the study examined compared with the US or the
UK but also has lower levels of environmental transgression than any other
country. In a populous country like ours, India
lost more people to the impacts of climate change than any other country and
suffered third highest financial losses from extreme weather events as per a
report on global climate vulnerability released on November 9, 2017. The Global Climate Risk Index 2018 referred to India’s intense heat waves, extreme
rainfall events and severe floods to label the country as the sixth most
vulnerable in 2016 after Haiti, Zimbabwe, Fiji, Sri Lanka and Vietnam.
The scientists suggested radical changes world-wide
if people are to live well within the limits of the planet’s resources. “These
changes include moving beyond the pursuit of economic growth in wealthy
countries, shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy and significantly
reducing inequality”, rightly observed Prof. Julia Steinberg of the University of
Leeds, the co-author of the study published in Nature
Sustainability. Obviously, this calls
for restructuring the distribution pattern of the planet’s resources in a
balanced and equitable manner and also to ensure that basic needs be met at a
much low level of resource use.
The fact that various environmental problems have
affected human population, specially the poorer sections, has indeed been
alarming. Though
India is expected to record an increase of a little over 2 per cent in carbon
emissions, the rise is much less as compared to 6 per cent average increase it
notched up over the previous decade as per the conclusions of the 2017 Global
Carbon Budget report (released
on November 13 last year) on
the sidelines of the UN Climate Conference (COP23).
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court in a judgment of the
bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta stated that 13 of 20 of the
world’s most polluted cities were in India and pollution had become the “most
critical problem”. It urged the need for a concerted effort from all
authorities concerned to effectively curb the menace as the problem was not
only affecting the present generation but would accentuate and future
generations would have to pay a much heavier price.
The order further rightly pointed out: “All our
healthcare programmes would go haywire if pollution (and contamination) is not
controlled. People will keep falling sick because of pollution”. Statistics, as
per the Global Burden of Disease 2017, reveal that early death related to PM 2.5 in India are
the second highest in the world and ozone related deaths the highest.
An epidemiological study by the Central Pollution
Control Board and the Kolkata-based Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute
showed every third child had reduced lung function. The report said their
sputum contained four times more iron-laden macrophages than those from cleaner
environs, indicating pulmonary haemorrhage. It
is now an established fact that toxicity has increased at a rather fast,
specially in metros and cities, leading to spurt in different forms of cancer,
which till date incurable in the country.
One may refer to Stephen Fry, a
celebrated TV personality and a vocal activist for science propagation who very
aptly stated: “If we bet on
human-caused climate change as a reality, then we will (have to) decrease
pollution, discover new, cheaper sustainable energy resources, save materials
and clean the planet. If we bet that we have nothing to do with climate change
then we will discourage investment in new power sources, run out of fossil
fuels and other finite resources and live in a dirties planet”.
It is well known that nature has given us enough to
satisfy our needs but not our greed. Prof. John Galbraith lamented: “we have
become slaves of machine we have created to serve us and the servitude is felt
comfortable as a result of mass suggestion to which consumers are subjected”.
The craving for unlimited pleasures accelerated industrialisation leading to
rapid depletion of non-renewable resources and the problems of pollution and
ecology.
It is pertinent here to refer to Mahatma Gandhi who
pleaded for a technology and economics within the framework of ecological
balance of a holistic paradigm. He tried to foster a life based on simple
living and high thinking. Thus the Gandhian model of development is based on
renewable resources like animal, water, oil, solar power and less on
non-renewable sources, which does not lead to environmental pollution or
disturbs the ecological balance. How should one go about the problem at this
juncture, at least in India?
The answer is to follow ecological economics for a
sustainable approach and counter the ecological threat, integrating key elements
of ethics, quality of life, environment and community. An inclusive and
sustainable approach has to be followed wherein there is
decentralisation of political and economic power and involvement of the people
in the development process.
This could be accomplished in the country through
transformation of the rural sector having two-third of the population, and
doubling resource from the present 20 per cent to make villages self-sufficient
engines of growth and this could lead to real development.
Finally, it needs to be reiterated that at present modern
civilization based on consumerism and materialism has to be outrightly rejected
and a new form of civilization has to be the order of the day which is
integrated with need based approach to life. A civilization that is
ecologically balanced has to be the strategy of all countries, including India.---INFA
(Copyright, India News &
Feature Alliance)
|