Events & Issues
New Delhi, 17 January 2018
Labour Reforms
ENSURING BASIC WAGES,
INCOME
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
It is indeed heartening
that the Government plans to introduce a pan India minimum wage that would
cover all sectors of the economy. Labour reforms have been a long standing
issue and adequate attention needs to be given in this regard. More so because
labour productivity has increased during the past two decades and better
facilities would further gear this up.
The Labour Code on
Wages Bill, introduced in Lok Sabha last year and sent to a select Committee, is
likely to be pushed by the Government this Budget session. It seeks to empower
the Centre to fix a universal minimum wage for workers across the country and
is expected to benefit over 40 crore employees. The Code will cover employees
who draw more than Rs 18,000 a month who are currently outside the ambit of the
Minimum Wages Act. The Indian code would consolidate four different wage
related laws -- the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Payment of Wages Act, 1936,
Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976.
Whether Dearness
Allowance would be included is not known, but the Bill would revise the
national minimum wage every two years. This is indeed an important step as it would
go a long way in correcting disparities in income, though industry captions are
not quite happy as they feel that minimum wages in metropolis and cities cannot
be the same as in rural areas.
It is a well known
fact that certain States have not revised the minimum wage for several years
and it would be difficult for them to implement the code. There are people who
are not quite optimistic and feel the implementation of the universal minimum
wage may not be easy. At present, employers across different sectors have to
grapple with at least a dozen definitions of wage related terms strewn across
various Acts.
While many welcome the
government’s initiative on GST aimed at “one nation one tax”, they would
profess the necessity for a common minimum wage too. Though States may
initially have some difficulty in implementing this code due to financial and
other factors, this has to be done across the country in different sectors like
construction, BPO and IT, manufacturing, jewellery, plantation etc. Though the
labourers’ right to get equal wages in various sectors cannot be denied, there would
definitely be different wages for skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled workers
as is there presently.
While basic minimum
wage would cater to workers in the formal sector, those in the informal sector
would benefit if the present talk of bringing in Universal Basic Income (UBI)
is implemented. The idea of UBI is aimed at paying everybody a uniform amount
as part of welfare, which is getting some credence in political discourse
worldwide as a simple antidote to poverty. It may also be viewed as a means to
demolish complex welfare bureaucracies while meeting some social transfer
obligations without weakening work incentives significantly.
In India, anti-poverty
programmes are very important and need to be taken up judiciously. This
strategy can also be a substantial measure to improve autonomy (say, of adult
women, three-quarters of whom do not earn income) and dignity by giving workers
an escape ladder from socially despised occupations (scavenging,
waste-carrying, prostitution, etc).
A major section is
favourably disposed to the idea of UBI. However, some fiscal bureaucrats and
economists say the country cannot afford it due the additional burden since vested
interests are against replacing existing welfare programmes. Moreover, social
activists, come from the opposite end, think that UBI is a ploy to politically
undermine some of the existing welfare programmes which are working reasonably
well.
According to well
known economists, Prof. Pranab Bardhan and others, recent estimates (made at
the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy) suggest that (Central plus
State) subsidies that mainly go to better-off people (‘non-merit subsidies’)
amount to about 5 per cent of GDP. In addition the Central budget alone shows
‘revenues foregone’ (primarily tax concessions to companies) coming to a little
over 6 per cent of GDP.
Even if one-third of
these revenues foregone are made available for this purpose, added to the
non-merit subsidies, it comes to around 7 per cent of GDP potentially available
for UBI, which is a substantial sum, more than twice the total amount currently
spent on all anti-poverty programmes.
This could be easily
raised from more taxation or ensuring that taxes are paid properly by those who
are supposed to do so. The tax-GDP ratio in India is substantially lower than
in China, Brazil and some other developing countries. Moreover, real estate and
property tax assessments in the country are absurdly low compared to their
market value. Added to this is the current endeavour to ensure that the rich
and the high salaried class give up subsidies that are normally meant for the
lower middle, lower income groups and economically weaker sections. There is
also zero taxation of agricultural income, long-term capital gains in equity
markets, and of wealth and inheritance.
It is thus necessary
to divert some of the subsidies (and revenues foregone) from their current
better-off recipients and introduce significant fresh taxation of the rich to
make UBI a reality. Some resources may also be released by terminating some of
the particularly wasteful welfare programmes, but UBI should not replace
programmes like ICDS, mid-day meals and MGNREGA.
The Economic Survey
last year admitted that UBI, based on the principles of universality and
unconditionality, rightly pointed out is no mere anti-poverty measure, but
rather “gives concrete expression to the idea that we have a right to a minimum
income, merely by virtue of being citizens. It is the acknowledgment of the
economy as a common project.”
Obviously, there are
a number of implementation challenges. There was speculation about the Finance Minister
announcing a UBI-like scheme in some form in his budget after the Jammu and
Kashmir government became the first State to commit to UBI for all citizens
living below the poverty line. But the Finance Minister did not do so.
Along with uniform
minimum wages in all parts of the country, UBI should also be implemented as
early as possible, at least for the poorer sections. This should be a first
step towards labour reform and engaging youth in the right direction through
productive work in various sectors.
If we are to reduce
disparities in income and ensure equality in society, simultaneously with skill
development there is need to assure at least one member of every family some
sort of work and income. This would indeed be a pioneering initiative of our
government for which economists and planners should be asked to find the right
path of implementation. The earlier it is done, the better for the country. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|