Open Forum
New
Delhi, 29 December 2017
India’s NGOs
IN DEEP TROUBLE
By Moin Qazi
India
is now all set to frame a law to curb the wild growth of NGOs. The voluntary sector in the country has
been under regulatory pressure for one reason or the other. The Supreme
Court has reiterated the need for a law to regulate the activities and funding
of non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
The CBI has informed the apex court
that there were 3.3 million registered NGOs and voluntary organisations, but
less than 10% of these, 307,000 lakh to be precise, filed their audited
accounts. It is certainly symptomatic of a deep malaise that calls for
cleansing.
The NGOs, including local arms of
global organisations and homegrown groups, work on a wide range of issues such
as livelihoods, gender rights, road safety, human rights, microfinance,
environmental protection, healthcare, agriculture and sustainable energy. They
are an integral part of development and serve as the crucial interface between
the government and the community.
Going by the figures provided by the
CBI, one finds that the number of NGOs is double the number of schools in the
country, and 250 times the number of government hospitals. There is one NGO for
every 400 people as against one policeman for every 709 people. Though there
are many NGOs doing commendable work, the impressive numbers do not always
translate as impressive work.
But these unhappy developments cannot undervalue
the contribution of the voluntary sector to developmental work in rural India.
The role of NGOs as agents of development and change is well-documented. These
have proved to be reliable and innovative solution providers, especially in
last-mile situations. The development history of rural
India, particularly tribal areas, is studded with a high degree of commitment
and sacrifice of countless grassroots workers. India’s rural transformation
would have been impossible without their selfless dedication to development.
The best and recent example is the
self-help group (SHG) movement that has empowered women in a remarkable way.
Closely associated with the programme right from its inception in 1992, I have
observed grassroots workers negotiate tough terrains -- physical, social and
administrative -- to equip individuals and the leaders of village-level
institutions with knowledge, skills, and confidence to become informed and
active self-advocates for the development of their communities.
The SHG movement, which is now in
its silver jubilee year, has grown massively with 85 lakh units operating
across the country. These are the biggest generators of social capital in rural
India. The vast majority of women leaders in Panchayat Raj Institutions and the
most successful sarpanchs (village council chiefs) have had their grooming in
the self-help collectives.
Moreover, SHGs have proved to be an
effective instrument in transforming oppressive gender-biased customs at home
and in the community. This is especially true for those arising from caste,
class and political power, which have made it difficult for the poor to find a
sustainable livelihood and a holistic growth.
According to the census of 2011,
about 69% of the country’s population resides in villages. With nearly
three-quarters of the population, rural India has high potential for
accelerating the nation’s overall socio-economic development.
The potential can be harnessed
through building value-based partnerships for livelihood promotion, human
resources development, and financial inclusion while optimising natural resources
through efficient water management and sustainable agricultural practices. As
always, NGOs will have an important role to play in the rural ecosystem.
NGOs are an important part of
India’s vibrant civil society, helping the community interact with the
government. These have made a pivotal contribution on a range of issues such as
water resource management, agriculture, income enhancement, sanitation,
education, governance, and capacity building of village-level institutions.
Unfortunately, not all NGOs are
started with noble intentions. In many cases, NGOs are promoted for the private
economic benefit of the founders. It is saddening that the grassroots workers
of the NGOs have always been very poorly paid, the bulk of the aid being
cornered by the founders and administrators.
While non-performing NGOs should be
weeded out, the process of scrutiny should be transparent so that the genuine
ones are not demoralised. However in a democracy, the government must be
cautious and should not, in the name of legal disciplining, crack down on
legitimate NGOs that do not toe the government line. An autonomous civil
society is highly critical to a nation’s development.
We need to be sensitive to the
hazards to which the grassroots workers are frequently exposed. Before I took
up a career in development banking, I worked as a journalist and wrote
extensively for both national and international press about the development
sector. Travelling in the hinterlands gave me firsthand idea of rural problems.
My identity as a journalist gave me access to administrators in the highest
offices and much-needed protection locally. But the grassroots workers do not
enjoy such privileges and protection.
Most of the attention is on
beneficiaries of social programmes – their livelihoods, saving habits, gender
relations, etc., as these are seen as the indicators of measuring the reach and
effectiveness of the aid. Rarely is the lens turned on the lives of development
workers: how they relate to aid beneficiaries, their local peers in the
development machinery, and the security and family issues that come with the
job. Personal courage and values count. The values held dear by the urbanites
are tested in the field. Peaceful coexistence with political agents remains an
ongoing challenge.
Though everyone welcomes rural
development there is no personal risk for an outsider. When there are conflicts
of interest where the weak are dominated and exploited, many of the rural poor
and those who work with and for them face abuse, discrimination and danger.
There is a lot of innovation and
sacrifice by the staff of voluntary organisations, known only to the
beneficiaries. Even in the organisations’ periodic reports, the contribution of
individuals towards the success of the project is not documented. We should
really applaud and honour ordinary men and women, who work doggedly to
implement the projects.
As with any institutional structure
the need for transparency and accountability are crucial. Complete adherence to
the laws and systems are a sign of veracity of any organisation. Civil society
should instill confidence in the people since it symbolises their aspirations.
It is all the more important for those working in rural areas since the people
in the hinterlands are not adequately empowered to safeguard their own
interests. It is necessary that NGOs look inward and set their houses in order
to regain the lost credibility that had been built through the sacrifices of
countless committed grassroots workers.
In
rural India, NGOs are one component in the broader development network but in
certain conditions, they happen to be the most powerful tool. It is important
how we leverage their potential. The need of the hour in the non-governmental
sector is for the government to keep a transparent check on non-performing NGOs
while recognising and appreciating NGOs and their teams that make a positive
contribution.
While governance and accountability
are necessary to ensure the NGOs stay on course, politicians should be careful
not to force their narrow ideologies on people, as they would negate the works
of the genuine NGOs.---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|