Economic Highlight
New
Delhi, 1 January 2018
Wasteful Litigation
JPC ON POLICY CORRECTION?
By Shivaji Sarkar
Even as 2018 dawns, the shadow of a scam, which
a judge now says never was, will continue to be cast on the Indian
politico-economy. So also in the dock is the most credible institution, Comptroller
and Auditor General (CAG), which propounded the theory of “presumptive loss” of
staggering Rs 1.76 lakh crore, the bureaucracy, which could not give the proper
advice and many more. At the same time, another question now arises on the
cancellation of 122 telecom licenses by the Supreme Court.
The court has the powers to scrutinise,
approve or reject government policies. But as of now, the 2G spectrum case is
bound to travel back to the Supreme Court, and the curtain does not come down
on the 2G drama.
The scam had heaped a severe financial cost
not only on the government but many companies, the nation’s economy and
politics. Many individuals suffered, it took crucial time of the judiciary and
led to wastage of enormous public money on litigation. A critical question is:
would this “non-issue” once again be an election issue?
In this entire process, Law Minister Ravi
Shankar Prasad perhaps stands correct on his advice to the government
departments to avoid unnecessary litigation and wasteful expenditure. It
happens mostly either because of avoidance of decision or arbitrary functioning
at the bureaucratic level or an attitude to teach a lesson, mostly to junior
officers or employees, who may have disagreed with their superior.
This is happening almost in all government or
semi-government departments, armed and para-military, police forces, public
sector enterprises and even innocuous organisations such as institute of mass communication
or an organisation related to study of history, emanating often from the attitude
of a pig-headed person and no superior official trying to take the corrective
step. Thereafter, it flows into the portals of judiciary, which often tries to
correct the course and ensure justice, but at a tremendous cost to the
individuals and reputation of the organisations.
Possibly the stand taken by the trial court
judge OP Saini points out to this bureaucratic mess at the level of the Ministry
and prosecuting agencies -- the CBI and Enforcement Directorate, which could
not substantiate the “presumptive loss” theory or connect the supposed
beneficiary or establish their familiarity with company officials with former telecom
minister A Raja.
Saini’s comment is harsh but appropriate when
he says that there is no proof of scam and in a stunning verdict had acquitted
all accused, including the then minister, DMK leader Kanimozhi, former telecom
secretary Sidhartha Behura, Raja's
erstwhile private secretary RK Chandolia, Swan Telecom promoters Shahid Usman
Balwa and Vinod Goenka, Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and three top executives of
Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (RADAG) -- Gautam Doshi, Surendra Pipara
and Hari Nair,
in the case.
The same day, December 21, 2017, the equity
prices at the BSE of Unitech surged 19.91 per cent
before closing at Rs. 7.92, 11.86 per cent
higher, D B Realty closed higher by 19.89 per cent, Reliance Communications
rose by 4 per cent, Sun TV Network 5.98 per cent before closing at Rs. 982. It is a pointer how the market purviews an
action or correction.
It is also a fact that since
the 2G, government’s pricing of utility services, train fares, metro fares, electricity,
water, parking and bank charges have risen several fold as the basic principle
of keeping such prices low was replaced by a policy of auction or profit to the
government. Even NGT arbitrary decisions have thrown the nation out of gear. It
has added to inflation, and government’s costs -- fiscal deficit. It calls for
a relook for re-establishing the concept of a Welfare State.
Nobody can deny that the 2G
case happened because of one reason. The government policy or perception of
allotting the spectrum was not clear or possibly since this was a new area no
one had an inkling of how to do it. It is also true that nobody also tried to
set a policy. It also raises doubts, as many have done recently, on the
competence of the India’s iron frame, the top government officials. It does not
exonerate the political class either, who have succumbed to such officials or
swooned in the face of agitations by persons like Anna Hazare.
It is also true that since
it was the beginning of introduction of spectrum, none then had taken into
account that when 2G was introduced, the rest of the world was introducing 3G
and was toying with the idea of 4G. The 2G was virtually on its way out. Sadly
enough while deciding on spectrum price -- presumptive valuation -- even the
CAG did not take this into consideration. If it had done the seven-year ordeal
the nation witnessed and millions if not billions lost in litigation may
possibly had not been there.
The nation now must take
firm corrective steps for policy formulation. The Narendra Modi government should
have the courage and an innovative mind. It should consider constituting an all-party
Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) and include as advisors some victims of 2G
case, such as Behura and others, to suggest future decision-making process for
similar situations.
There can be wrong policy
decisions but it should not lead to adducing criminality or corruption to fix a
rival. This can bring governance to a standstill. The policies also must harp
on doing away with the colonial mindset. It has to specify that disagreement by
a junior functionary is not indiscipline. There should be provisions for
realising the cost plus 12 per cent interest from pig-headed officials, of
whatever level, for forcing wasteful avoidable of litigation.
It should not be forgotten
that such litigations, issuing of memo or threat of disciplinary actions
vitiate the atmosphere of organisations, reduce productivity and mount severe financial
and manpower cost on the government.
While accountability of the
people sitting in the chair has to be fixed, it should also lay down procedures
for not trusting in all kinds of lies, mischievous allegations and
arbitrariness that these persons stoop down to harass and humiliate persons
below their rank. These are easy tools for the corrupt heads of departments or organisations.
This would be a way to check corruption that the government is determined to
weed out.
The Saini judgment should be
taken as a beginning for correcting official procedures. It should also call
for reconsideration of revenue maximisation through auctions at high prices as
it rejects the possibility of growth through lower tariffs, greater capital
investment and focus on quality benefiting both the people, corporate and the
government. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|