Political Diary
New
Delhi, 21 November 2017
Cultural Vultures
LIFE IN ‘OFFICIAL’
SLIM STIP
By Poonam I Kaushish
Democracy is a
conflict of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. A succinct saying
which aptly nails the ongoing maelstrom over two films: Padmavati a story of a
Rajput Queen and a documentary which depicts Arvind Kejriwal as a hero and the
petitioner, who threw ink at him, a convict. Welcome to the latest season of
the Culture of Protests and the Ugly Intolerant Indian!
Unheard of Rajasthan’s
fringe groups Karni Sena, Rashtriya
Ekatha Manch and former Jaipur royals want a complete ban on the movie as it shows
the Queen in bad light. UP Chief
Minister Yogi has said the film’s release could pose a law and order problem. Added
a Haryana Minister, “glamourising Alauddin Khilji's character is akin to
praising those who carry out acid attacks on girls" and in Gujarat’s Surat
thousands took out a protest march.
Alas, the power of
rhetorical public abuse and remonstrations by random Hindutva outfits
underscores the discourse is not only becoming increasingly rabble rousing,
abusive and devoid of any substance but also tilted towards widening the
communal divide.
A classic case of
“ideological intolerance” by Hindutva brigands who enjoy patronage of the RSS
largesse as opposed to Nehruvian or Left ideology and beliefs of the present
ruling dispensation. Either way, the protests once again strips India of all
balance and open-mindedness wherein intolerance and violence is the rhetoric of
the times.
Raising a moot point:
What is about the film that it needs to be banned or else? How does exercising
one’s freedom of expression tantamount to distorting history? Is the NDA
crushing free speech, suppressing debate and dissent which are essential pre-requisites
of creative and thinking minds? Is it afraid of clash of ideas? Have we lost
the ability to accept criticism? Bordering on a narcissist phobia?
Questionably, are
threats, fear and coercion the new grammar of Naya Bharat’s political ecosystem? Is the polity afraid of the
clash of ideas? Is India in the midst of political intolerance with Hindutva
values thrust down our throats? Are we so paranoid or intolerant that any act
of laughter, joke, film or perceived bigotry is viewed as twisting facts? How
does merely criticizing a film tantamount to spreading “hatred”?
In this eddy of tu-tu-mein-mein kudos to the Supreme
Court which underlined that freedom of speech and expression are “sacrosanct”
and “should not be ordinarily interfered with. An artist has his own freedom to
express himself in a manner which is not prohibited in law and such prohibition
is not read by implication to crucify the rights of expressive mind.”
Hopefully, this should
end the outpourings of bigotry against a book, film or artwork which pokes fun
or is not in sync with a fringe group or community’s thinking. Recall, in 2007,
a Buddhist group filed a complaint against actress Rakhi Sawant because she
posed in a bathtub against a Lord Buddha statue. Or cases against famous painter MF Husain for painting
Bharat Mata as a naked woman, hurting religious sentiments.
Indeed, How does one
control the hate mongers and blunt them? Would it not only further divide the
people on creed lines but is also antithetical to hope of narrowing India’s
burgeoning religious divide, thereby unleashing a Frankenstein.
Sadly, this is not
the first time noises have been made by narrow sectarian groups. Many films,
books even cartoons have been banned, innumerable artists have faced taboo and
forced out in a country which prides itself for being the birthplace of apostles of peace and non-violence ----
Gandhi, Buddha and Mahavir.
Undeniably,
cut-throat communalism is at work. Whereby, these rabid outfits with the
backing of our netas have made the
Hindu-Muslim vote-bank the tour de force
of politics. With every leader propounding his self-serving recipe of
‘communal’ harmony: To keep gullible vote-banks emotionally charged so that
their ulterior motives are served. Never mind, the nation is getting sucked
into the vortex of centrifugal bickerings.
If one doesn’t like a
film collect a crowd and burn theaters. If you don’t like a novelist’s book get
the Government to ban it or issue a fatwa
against the author. Remember, an innocuous cartoonist was arrested for
sedition by Mamata in Kolkata and renowned cartoonist Shankar’s Ambedkar’s
caricatures in NCERT school books were posthumously removed. Tamil Nadu banned
noted actor-director Kamal Hasan’s 100 crores magna opus Viswaroopam which dealt
with terrorism on the fallacious ground it would hurt the sentiments of
‘unknown’ Muslim groups and create a law and order problem.
Tragically, our
leaders exploit the peoples emotions and only look at what will help popularize
them and increase votebanks. Even if it tantamounts to cultural terrorism. See
how the Shiv Sena forced cancellation of Pakistani Ghazal singer Ghulam Ali’s
concert in Mumbai and its cadres disrupted a BCCI meeting for reviving Indi-Pak
cricket ties.
Shah Rukh Khan was cornered
for saying what it is to be a Muslim in India, getting caught in the crosshairs
of an unseemly Indo-Pak spat leading him to say he was a proud Indian. The Rajasthan
Government registering an FIR against sociologist Ashis Nandy for his
controversial remarks on SC/ST corruption at the 2013 Jaipur Literature
Festival. Livid Dalit icons BSP’s Mayawati and LJP's Ram Vilas Paswan forced him
to get a stay from the Supreme Court.
Bluntly, even as we are
politically and economically free we remain hostage to society’s errant
elements which the political class exploits. Consequently, rabid outfits like
Ram Sene and Jamai'at-ul-Ulma-I-Hind proliferate and act with impunity because
authorities are reluctant to take action against them. Sadly, increasing
hooliganism exposes the continuing failure of law and order with the BJP
disinclined or unable to rein in its cohorts.
Clearly, India is in
the grip of self-styled chauvinism and cultural dogmas wherein writers,
intellectuals, historians or hoi polloi are soft targets with imprudent
reactions taking over debates and calibrated decisions. Life is lived in the slim strip called the
official and every joke, wit, satire or defiance treated as a monster. Big deal
if this makes public discourse impoverished and toothless.
At the present
reckoning, we might remain indefinitely trapped in divisive rhetoric.
Unfortunately, most Indians do not care. Absence of national character and
indiscipline has led to a creeping paralysis of ‘sab chalta hai’.
Where do we go from
here? Pander to rabid rabble rousers and vote banks politics? Is the Government
capable of defusing this treacherous powder keg? Notably, no licence should be
given to anyone from any background to spread ill-feeling or hatred towards any
historical person, leader or community who do not see themselves as
Ram-Rahim-Jesus children.
The Centre and State
Governments cannot pass the buck to each other for ongoing madness. Our leaders
should raise the bar on public discourse, not lower it any more than has been
done. Certainly, freedom of speech and expression enshrined in our Constitution
is sacrosanct and inviolable which needs to be cherished and protected.
The message has to go
out clearly that no person, group or organization can threaten violence, and if
they do, they lose their democratic right to be heard. India could do without those
who distort politics and in turn destroy democracy and laughter. It’s time to
control the hate mongers and blunt them.
In sum, we need to desist from acerbic
speeches and narrow-mindedness. Criticism is a sign of a thriving and robust
democracy. India could do without people who destroys democracy and laughter.
------ INFA.
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|