Political Diary
New Delhi, 24 October
2017
Political Funds
ALL HUSH-HUSH ABOUT
SLUSH
By Poonam I Kaushish
Money makes the
clogged, polluted and corrupt political mare go around, and how! In the
on-going Great Indian Political Circus with polls due in NaMo’s Gujarat and
Himachal Parties are busy ‘funding’ their vacuous promises. After all, what
better time to hit the jackpot!
Unsurprisingly, the
BJP is the richest Party with assets worth over Rs 893.88 crores in 2015-16,
according to last week’s Association for Democratic Reforms report which
analysed assets and liabilities of seven Parties on the basis of data submitted
to the Election Commission from 2004-05 to 2015-16.
But the Party that
hit gold is Mamata’s Trinimool’s whose wealth grew by 17,896% in these 11
years, followed by Mayawat’s BSP at
1,197% and Pawar’s NCP by 809%. The BJP came fourth with 627% growth. Only the
CPM’s growth has been consistent over the period.
More. Alongside,
Congress’s liabilities alarmingly went up by over 4,000%, Rs 8 crores in
2004-05 to Rs 329.43 crores by 2015-16. It is followed by the BJP whose burden
grew to Rs 24.99 crores in 2015-16.
How? A Party is not a
bank or a mutual fund which offers interest and good returns so why would
anyone put his money on it? Or is it according to a preference for Parties and
their ideologies? Are the donations altruistic? Certainly not, they are purely
a business proposition, a quid pro quo. Is it political insurance? Yes.
Any wonder the
donation cup overflows whenever a Party is in power at the Centre or States?
The modus operandi is simple. A person helps a Party with funds and, in return,
gets his job done. It is not for nothing that businessmen are known as
king-makers and the power behind the throne, specially, a handful of top
industrial houses which boast about their clout in the corridors of power.
A cursory glance of
affidavits filed with the EC prior to polls revealed the bizarre realities of
politics. It showcased significant contributions from several business houses
that have directly benefited from the Party in power. A metal and mineral baron
who had funded the BJP in 2000, became the proud owner of 51% of Bharat
Aluminum Co Ltd (BALCO). By paying $121 million sparking off protests that it
was undervaluated.
Perhaps taking a cue
another steel magnate paid Rs 50 crores and was rewarded with highway
construction contracts, ditto the case with a Delhi builder who funded the
BJP. Yet, one more industrialist paid Rs
50 lakhs to the Congress in 2003 and within months was inducted into the Party.
However, in the 2004 Lok Sabha poll he was one of the highest donors to the BJP
even though he contested on Congress ticket and won. Truly, playing both ends
against the middle.
More. Between 2004-5
and 2011, the BJP received Rs 952.5 crores from unknown sources and the then
ruling Party Sonia’s Grand Dame garnered Rs 1,951 crore in its electoral war
chest. Donations for 2003-04 showed how the fortunes of the ruling Party
differed from the one out of power. While the Congress ‘officially’ received
just Rs 2.81 crore, the BJP managed over Rs 11.69 crore. Money was paid through
little-known trusts, or in some cases, directly by the business groups.
Most scandalously,
presently Parties only report contributions above Rs 20,000 to the EC under
law. No one knows where almost Rs 3675 crores came from. Think, between 2004-05
and 2011-12 a whopping total of Rs 4899 crores was the income of six national
Parties. But less than a quarter of this money is accounted for.
This is not all.
Britain’s Vedanta Resources and its Indian subsidiaries donated over Rs. 10.29
crores to the Congress and Rs 19.5 crores to the BJP in 2003-12. Topped by
another Rs 28 crores in 2012-15. Investigating agencies while closely
monitoring inward remittance to Parties through sham foreign investments found
a sudden spike in West Bengal wherein foreign fund inflow has increased to
around $1,788 million during 2013 as against $1,499 in 2012.
Believe it or not,
only 11.89% of Congress’s total funding of Rs 774 crores and 22.76% of BJP
income of Rs 426 crores in 2009-10 and 2010-11 came from donations above Rs
20,000, according to reports submitted to the EC. The BSP which got donations
of Rs. 99 crores in 2009- 2011 said it received zero donations over Rs.20,000.
Even the CPI (M) which claims to be morally on a higher plank than other Parties
stated that just 1.29% of the money it got as donations in 2009-10 was in
excess of Rs 20,000!
Clearly, underscoring
the symbiotic and partly antagonistic relationship between industry and
politics. Notwithstanding, over the years the Government has tried to bring in
legislation to regulate Party funds, namely distribution and spending of Party
funds during non-elections and elections. Getting them to maintain regular
accounts and make audited accounts available for inspection. It even held out
threats of de-recognition if parties filed false and incorrect election
returns. But nothing worked. Even as poll costs continue to increase.
Sadly, there is
brazen hypocrisy and humbug in what transpires under the framed rules. Today, a
candidate spends over Rs.10 crore per election instead of Rs.25 lakhs allowed
by the Law. Hypothetically, the minimum amount needed by each party for the 545
Lok Sabha seats would be Rs.5450 crore. Multiplied by 10 candidates per
constituency, it adds up to a mind-boggling Rs.54,500 crore. Are we expected to
believe that this amount will now be collected by cheques, only cheques?
True, over the years
the Government has tried to bring in legislation to regulate Party funds, its
distribution and spending during non-elections and elections. Getting them to
maintain regular accounts and make audited accounts available for inspection.
It even held out threats of de-recognition if Parties filed false and incorrect
election returns. But nothing worked. Even as poll costs continue to increase.
What is the way out?
In a milieu where are netagan have
much to lose and the public everything to gain by a transparent funding system,
unless one determines the sources that should be legally tapped for Party
expenses there is little hope of minimizing the evil influence of vested
interests.
One, donations should
be evenly spread out, not necessarily equally, but perhaps in some proportion
to seats in Parliament. Two, State funding of elections and funds be
apportioned on votes basis secured by candidates. Three, amount be released to
candidates, not Parties. Four, 50% given as advance pre-election on past
performance basis.
Undeniably, Parties
will continue to stonewall all efforts to come clean on funding. Hence
irrespective of whether a Party is in power, donations must be made public as the
aam janata has the right to know
whether a Party’s stand on a policy is influenced by the source of its funding.
Towards that end, there must be compulsory social audit of political funding by
the EC or by a group of auditors shortlisted by the CAG.
In sum, given that
Parties function as private limited companies, each with its own secret war
chests we still have a long way to go before we can make elections honestly
free and fair. The time has come for Parties to be publicly transparent about
their financing and end ghooskhori. Else
Modi’s tall talk of eradicating corruption will remain empty blabber! ------
INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|