Events
& Issues
New Delhi, 11 October
2017
Economic Revival
DISCARD TOP-DOWN APPROACH
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
Suddenly there is a great
momentum for the need to revive the economy. After recent criticism by former
finance minister Yashwant Sinha, of the government’s failure on the economic
front, Prime Minister Modi has tried to highlight NDA’s achievements and trash the
analysis as totally unfounded. However, Modi’s defence hasn’t been convincing
as the RBI’s projection of 6.7 per cent GDP growth in the current fiscal may
not be a reality.
There are frequent
discussions by economists and political analysts on TV for its revival but most
of them, who are divorced from grass-root reality, fail to assess the
situation. Economic revival is a pet subject for debate over years and these
so-called experts, who mostly support the government in power, find ways and
means to paint a rosy picture in the coming years. The ADB forecast of 7 per
cent growth in this financial year may also not become a reality.
It is understood that
the government plans to spend Rs 50,000 crores ($7.7 billion) to halt the
economic slowdown. Though fiscal deficit may increase to 3.7 per of GDP, this
is indeed a judicious decision to increase demand creation. As private sector
spending is not up to the mark and may not be so in this fiscal, if the public
sector is aggressive in setting up projects, demand would steadily go up.
For example, a railway
project or a port generates orders for steel, cement and machinery which
creates a derived demand in a host of sectors and helps the private sector rev
up growth. Though there has been some increase in infrastructure spending in
the current fiscal, the present spending may give the much needed booster to
the languishing economy. But projects have to be well planned so that these are
completed, preferable within a year or so.
However, efforts
would also have to be made to revive private sector investment and improve the
capacity of the banking system to support growth, as stated by Finance Minister
Jaitley at the IBA’s AGM in Mumbai recently. “How do you maintain the balancing
act between continuing to spend in an economy, supporting our banks and maintaining
the standards of fiscal prudence, he pondered.
The government is
committed to recapitalise State-run banks by Rs 10,000 crores during this
fiscal through budgetary allocations. Officials said there is thinking that
another Rs 20,000-30,000 crores may be raised through off budget funds
subscribed by financial institutions, including foreign lenders. Though
capitalisation of PSU banks remains a concern, adequate funds would be made
available to them. It is understood that the proposed capitalisation of bonds
with government guarantee would be made after discussions with the RBI.
It may be pertinent
to mention here the Congress’ allegation that NPAs, which was Rs 2.5 lakh
crores during the UPA’s term is now Rs 8.8 lakh crores, thus blaming the
government for mismanaging the financial sector.
The second quarter
results may not be much better as floods in some areas and drought in around
220 districts has thrown the agricultural sector into a crisis. Reports
indicate that kharif production may decline by around 3 per cent compared to
last year due to floods and deficit rainfall. But more than productivity
increase, the cost of agricultural production has increased considerably,
specially in the past 2-3 years, thereby necessitating a revision of MSP. If
agricultural labourers migrate to cities in search of employment, as a major
section is presently doing, urban chaos would accentuate further.
One may refer to well-known
economist Prof. Michael Lipton, formerly of Sussex University, who in his
famous book ‘Why Poor People Stay Poor?’ observed
that subsidy is being given to the urban middle and upper class at the cost of
the rural poor. If petrol diesel and cooking gas prices increase, even when
international prices are down and there are protests by opposition parties, why
should rice or wheat prices be artificially not allowed to increase, directly
affecting the farming community?
A section of experts,
who are always against loan waivers, would see this as an eye-wash, as regards
UP is concerned. In all, 6000 farmers got a waiver between Re 1 and Rs 10; 5000
farmers between Rs 10 and Rs 100 and 4000 between Rs 100 and Rs 1000.
Hoodwinking the poor wouldn’t take the UP government or any other government
any far.
The most important
challenge before the government is lack of job creation and rising unemployment
and underemployment. It is estimated that around 25,000 to 30,000 enter the
work force each day but only 450-odd find employment. This growing job crisis
is the key to Modi’s promise of economic revival. Various factors including the
quest for automation, stagnancy in manufacturing and an overall critical
situation for micro and small enterprises has led to reduced jobs. Even the tag
‘jobless growth’ may not be applicable in the present situation as growth has
shown a downward trend.
Meanwhile, the
textile industry, which is a massive job generating sector, is suffering due to
distorted GST structure. So is the case with MSMEs, very small traders and
businesses. Pesticides, fertilisers, tractors and agricultural equipments, cold
storage and warehouse construction are being taxed under GST. These need to be
corrected immediately for the economy to revive.
A certain section of
experts are of the opinion that when GDP growth rises, there would be a certain
amount of job creation and vice versa. One can debate as to what would be the
exact impact of job creation but the number of around a million jobs per 1 per
cent of GDP growth looks reasonable given that 12-13 million people enter the
workforce every year. Thus, the challenge is to create jobs fast enough and
economic growth alone is obviously not enough. There is need to re-skill people
and ensure there is empathy and dignity of labour so that not everyone wants to
become an engineer or an MBA.
In this somewhat
critical situation, the rural infrastructure has to be revitalised and more
money spent on infrastructure, both physical and social. In the physical
sphere, apart from roads, construction of cold chains, which are presently much
less than demand, is imperative for to prevent wastage of food grains while
health and education should be the focus of attention where lot of jobs could
be created.
Moreover, rural
welfare schemes need to be boosted with adequate resources. For example,
MGNREGA should be provided additional money and the minimum wages, as
applicable in different States and as demanded, should be enforced. Besides, to
ensure that schemes and projects are properly implemented, strict monitoring is
required which is abysmal.
Importantly, there is
need to discard the top-down approach and accept the bottom-up strategy. This
means giving more power to the panchayats by allowing them to identify projects
and schemes that benefit the poor and the EWS without imposing them from above.
Job creation should primarily be aimed at the rural sector and rural
enterprises should be given a boost through technology transfer and re-skilling
employees.
In fact, the present
challenge has to be tackled in a manner conducive to Indian conditions -- and
not what Western influenced experts say -- with an emphasis on job creation,
infrastructure building and rural revitalisation. Whatever the urban planners or
specialists may say, the focus of attention has to be on the majority of the
population. -- INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|