Political Diary
New
Delhi, 18 July 2017
‘Power’ of Corruption
WHAT HAS MORALITY GOT
TO DO WITH IT?
By Poonam I Kaushish
This is ludicrous. Look
at the inequity of the system. A 10th class fail is Bihar’s Dy Chief
Minister and a person who got 89 marks instead of 90 is rejected by the
Teachers Recruitment Board in Tamil Nadu. The former shrugs his shoulders
nonchalantly asserting, “I am elected by the people.” Sic. Indeed, Mera Desh Mahan!
If the ignominy of
being uneducated yet lording over the fate of citizens including the young
teacher aspirant is bad news, worse is the 10th class fail RJD Chief
Lalu’s son Tejashwi has been caught with
his hands in the corruption jar and is holding an entire State Government to
ransom by daring, sack me if you can.
This follows the ED
and CBI raiding 12 properties owned by Lalu, wife Rabri and Tejashwi across
the country and charge-sheeting them for illegally awarding hotel
maintenance and operation contracts to private firm Sujata Hotels for the
railways BNR Hotels in Ranchi and Puri when the RJD chief was Railway Minister
in 2006.
Simultaneously, the
company sold a prime three acre plot in Patna to Delight Marketing Company owned by Lalu
crony and ex-Corporate Minister PC Gupta’s wife Sarla for Rs 1.5 crores (less
than circle rate Rs1.93 crores) when the market rate was Rs 94 crores. She transferred
the land to Lara
(Lalu-Rabri) Projects LLP owned by Tejaswi. The ED is examining the circumstances in which
Tejashwi acquired control of AK Exports, via "prima facie illegal
transactions".
Undoubtedly, it is
matter of time before Tejashwi is compelled to quit or sacked. Specially post
Lalu’s assertion that his son owed no explanation as to how he acquired
disproportionate assets which he never declared and flexing his muscles I-am-your-mai-baap. Resulting in the
JD(U)-RJD cracks growing deeper with the
RJD Chief threatening Nitish that his ministerial brood would quit the Cabinet along-with
his ladla
and political heir.
I am not surprised,
like father like son. Remember Lalu too had initially refused to quit as Chief
Minister when charge-sheeted in the infamous chara scam in 1997. “Where does the Constitution say a person duly
elected in the people’s court has to resign merely on being charge-sheeted by
policemen? What has morality got to do with politics”, he quivered.
True, the courts will
judge the merits of the case, but it raises disturbing questions about our
democracy. That it does not strike any chord among our leaders who have reduced
graft to a farcical political pantomime. There is no sense of outrage or shame.
Can one compromise on corruption? Does politics force an indulgence on issues
of governance and probity? Is this part of political dharma? Whereby politics has everything to do with acceptability,
little with credibility and public life is all compromises, not principles
dripping morality sermons but not practicing it.
Either which way,
Lalu & Co has exposed the hypocrisy of our netas. As long as he is part of the Establishment, all wink at his
misdemeanors’ letting him misuse and abuse the legal lacuna to his advantage
till he runs out of legal lacunas. Witness, the statement by the ‘secular’
parties, “political vendetta ….framed by ‘communal’ BJP”, they yell.
The RJD Chief is not
the only one. Recall the scandals during Congress-led UPA II which earned it
the ignominy of Republic of Scams, 2G scam, Adarsh, CWG, Coalgate et al.
Bringing to the fore striking immoral aspects of governance. Whereby, an honest
person is perceived as one who does not get caught.
Indeed, it was a
matter of time when Nitish will croon enough, fed up of managing the inherent pulls
and pressures, several run-ins and extreme contradictions with Lalu since
coming to power two years ago. They in all probability will turn foes again given
Lalu’s disposition of always being numero
uno and believing he is truly the king maker, which in this case he is.
Ironically, both Nitish
and Lalu are identical in political upbringing but absolutely unlike in
demeanour and track record of governance: Nitish’s development, good governance
and clean image vs. Lalu’s Jungle raj. The Chief Minister is said
to be uncomfortable with the growing influence of Lalu’s family on the
coalition and the shadow the graft charges have cast on his brand of politics,
built on a promise of clean and corruption-free governance.
Today Nitish is
caught between a rock and hard place given his zero-tolerance against sleaze and
demanding tough action against
those holding benami properties
on the one hand and fear of the alliance breaking midway at the other. How he
manages his remaining term is a tough call given the divergence of style and
functioning. Reportedly, he has approached Congress Sonia and Rahul to persuade
Lalu not to delay Tejashwi’s resignation and put the alliance’s future in
doldrums.
However, given
Rahul’s Quixote ways, Nitish is nobody’s fool even as he has an unenviable task
of either convincing Lalu to get Tejaswi to resign yet not pull the plug from
the Government and manage the inherent contradictions, re-allay with old flame
BJP and save his Government or call for fresh poll. Already, his colleagues are
making the right noises ‘of always being comfortable’ with erstwhile Saffron ally.
The arithmetic too works, JD(U) 71+BJP’s 58 totals 129, a simple majority in
the Assembly.
That the BJP is not
averse, is apparent with senior Party leaders nostalgically recalling their 17
long years jugalbandi before parting
ways in 2014 by making plain it was willing to extend outside support. For Modi
he kills two birds with one stone, gets a foothold in Bihar and defuses
Nitish’s ambition as joint Opposition candidate for Bharat’s Gaddi in 2019.
Nitish is
savoir-faire knowing that to fulfill his development agenda he has to work with
the Centre and open its purse strings. More so, as in the last two years crime
has returned manifold, women are no longer safe and State contracts reek of
corruption. Alongside, he has to press on with policies that proffer
educational opportunities, jobs, provide fiscal substance for upward mobility
and social upliftment of his rainbow coalition of OBCs, EBCs, Mahadalits,
Musahars and Muslims who voted for him and continue focusing on bijli-sadak, Suraksha andNari Shakti.
Ironically, those who
have worked with Modi and Nitish swear that both share many common traits. Both
are meticulous, honest, hardworking and come from humble backgrounds. In their
respective settings, both are often accused of being “arrogant and
authoritative”. Their politics may diverge but it leaves the scope of the twain
meeting in the future.
Clearly, the chickens
have come home to roost for Lalu and family. But whether it is curtain down for
Bihar’s first family it is too early to say as the saying goes: “Jab tak rahega samose main aaloo, tab tak
rahega Bihar main Lalu!”
What next? The Bihar
spark might reignite the old chingari
showing there are never any full stops in politics. Consequently, power-sharing
will remain the name of the game, but it’s the political malfeasance and
assiduous cultivation of low morality for a place in high political society
that worries one. Importantly, our democracy needs urgent course correction and
corrective action. Wherein the Laloo narrative should make our netagan do a double-take, “Politics
might no longer be the last refuge of a scoundrel”. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|