Political Diary
New Delhi, 9 May, 2017
Two Rapes, Two
Verdicts
WHITHER EQUAL
JUSTICE?
By Poonam I Kaushish
You reap what you sow. This adage rang true as the Supreme
Court last week confirmed the death sentence for four convicts in the brutal
Nirbhaya case wherein a 23-year-old paramedical student was gang raped on a
moving bus on 16 December 2012 in Delhi.
Said the three-judge Bench: “It created a tsunami of shock…devastated social
trust, falling in the 'rarest of rare' category warranting the death penalty.”
Indeed, the wheel of justice had turned a full circle.
Paradoxically, justice did not fully prevail in the identical
Bilkis Bano case of 2002 whereby the pregnant 19-year old was gang raped during
the Godhra riots and 14 family members murdered including her three-year old
daughter. The Bombay High Court sentenced 11 to life imprisonment but refused
CBI’s appeal of death penalty for three.
Raising a moot point: Are we really angry about the amount
and impunity of sexual violence or do we applaud a judgment because of random
public attention? Should the outcome of a rape case depend on the vagaries of
public outcry? And should not all victims of sexual violence have equal claims
to justice?
Sadly, in a culture where the national narrative conditions
people to think that rape has no consequences; where violence has been
unleashed by an imbalanced sex ratio; and where women have little or no
cultural respect, 37,000 reported rapes per year is not shocking, or even
surprising. It is just par for the course.
Crimes against women have more than doubled over ten years
according to the National Crime Records Bureau’s latest data. Appallingly, four rapes occur every minute, 26
crimes every hour or one complaint every two minutes. There were over 470,556 molestation
cases, 315,074 kidnappings followed by rape 243,051, insult to modesty 104,151,
dowry death 80,833 and 66% women experienced sexual harassment between two and
five times during 2015.
How bad the situation is can be gauged from Capital Delhi which
accounts for over 17% of the total number of rape cases. An increase from 706
in 2012 to 2199 in 2016. Yet ironically the conviction rate has dropped
dramatically. In 2012, the police secured a 49.25% conviction, falling to
35.69% in 2013, 34.5% in 2014 and last year a mere 29.37%. All this, despite many
reforms post Nirbhaya and six fast-track courts to handle rape cases.
One explanation for this is the skewed sex ratio. Like China, India has a massive sex ratio
imbalance. According to the census, the sex ratio in the 0-6 age group has
risen from 102.4 males per 100 females in 1961 to 108.9 in 2011. In Modi’s Gujarat, the ratio is 112 boys to 100 girls.
Sociologists call this Bare Branches phenomenon wherein boys
are culturally preferred over girls consequently it gives rise to increasing
female feticide. Add to this, one gets nothing or little from the courts.
Disgustingly there are very few rapists who are convicted. Conveniently
forgetting that justice delayed (often indefinitely) is justice denied.
Perhaps it has something to do with our patriarchal lineage
and misogynistic culture. A culture that believes that the worst aspect of rape
is the defilement of the victim, who will no longer be able to find a man to
marry her — and that the only solution is to marry the rapist. Thereby,
rendering all measures ineffective.
Shockingly, instead of being apologetic and ensuring that
cities are safe for the fairer sex, ex-Delhi’s Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit
asserted, “Girls should not wear jeans and exposing clothes. They have no
business driving around at 2 am in the morning,” in reference to a woman
journalist’s rape.
Or Karnataka’s Home Minister blamed “western culture”
averring “these things do happen”. Really? Added another, “The more skin women
show it is like if there's gasoline, there will be fire. If there's spilt
sugar, ants will gravitate towards it.” Disgusting, to say the least. To
Samajwadi’s Mulayam, ‘boys will be boys”. Sic.
Alas, in an era when political image is branded like
detergents, trust our netas whose
only recourse to women safety is mouthing empty rhetoric, completely
disregarding the fact that they have collectively miserably failed time and
again in making our cities and environment safe for women. By strengthening
policing laws and tightening rules which would deter men to think thousand
times before they commit a rape or molest a woman.
Clearly, in a society heavily loaded in favour of men,
several women who face sexual abuse at work stay quite in order to avoid
further harassment and of getting unwanted attention. Or are hesitant to speak
out fearing they will be dubbed ‘loose charactered’ at best or ostracized at
worst. Either which way the damage is done.
Women continue to live in increasingly unsafe environs wherein
they are viewed as sex objects and mince-meat for male lust camouflaged as
human animals. Not a few complain that to rise professionally they need a
‘godfather’ who can make or break them. Comply or reconcile to battling it out
at every level.
Sadly, such
is the state of affairs we are immune to women being snatched off the streets
and gang raped in moving cars, unless it is a high profile one. In a survey
conducted by a London firm of 150 safe cities, New Delhi and Mumbai are
ranked 139 and 126 at the bottom of the heap.
True, subsequent to the Justice Verma Committee’s
recommendations post the Nirbhaya case, the new law has stringently defined
rape. But has it deterred men to think thousand times before they molest a
woman? Certainly not.
Specially
against the backdrop s that women are on their own vis-à-vis their safety. There is currently no special law against
sexual assault or harassment and only vaginal penetration counts as rape. Those
who molest a woman would be booked for “insulting or outraging the modesty of a
woman” or “intruding upon her privacy”. The maximum punishment is a year's
imprisonment, or a fine, or both.
What next? We need to ensure systematic education of
children to make certain they will respect women. Our learning process needs to
emphasize gender equality and eradicate the sick male mindset. A girl’s dress,
time and place should not determine her safety.
We need to change our approach to sexual harassment. Another option:
radical feminism to make a social impact.
Also, sexually harassed women must speak up as it will make
more people aware and come out in support thereby taking collective action. If
they continue to suffer in silence, they only encourage men to continue their
crime. Alongside, the right groundwork must be laid for women to work in a safe
and secure work environment and an orientation session for men and women on
what constitutes sexual harassment.
In an environ which has systematically obliterated morality
and where incidents of moral turpitude pervade country-wide, the judiciary has
delivered justice. The ball is now in our leaders’ court. Merely asserting a
course correction would no longer work. India needs a revolutionary change.
We need to seriously ponder for how long will women continue
to be playthings at the hands of the voyeuristic animals in the garb of men? Will
our judiciary continue to break new ground and unshackle women? A la Nirbhaya not Bilkis Bano. We need
to introspect: Balatkar aur apradhikaran
akhir kab tak? ----- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|